Author Topic: White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel  (Read 443 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 246,270
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/205216-white-house-may-not-cooperate-with-benghazi-probe

White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel

By Justin Sink - 05/05/14 02:40 PM EDT
The White House suggested Monday it may not cooperate with a new House select committee investigating the terror attack in Benghazi.

Press secretary Jay Carney said that the White House has "always cooperated with legitimate oversight," but called the new probe a “highly partisan effort to politicize” the deadly attack.

"If you look at even what some Republicans have said, it certainly casts doubt on the legitimacy of an effort that is so partisan in nature," Carney said.

"I don't think there are many people, including some Republicans… who believe that this is necessary after seven congressional committees and multiple investigations," he added.

Carney refused to answer questions directly about whether the White House would cooperate, but he noted that there had been 13 congressional hearings, 50 member-and staff briefings, and over 25,000 pages of documents produced over the September 11, 2012 terror attack, in which four Americans were killed.

"One thing this Congress is not short on is investigations into what happened before, during, and after Benghazi," he said.

"And all of these investigations… have found that the facts as we describe them, in terms of how we approach this, remain exactly as we described them then, the facts of yesterday or the facts today," Carney continued. "And they will be the facts no matter how often or for how long Republicans engage in highly partisan efforts to politicize what was a tragedy."

Earlier Monday, Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) announced that Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) will head the new select committee.

Boehner decided to call for the committee last week, after the revelation of an email from White House deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes, who recommended then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice should “underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”

The White House has maintained that Rhodes was merely prepping Rice to discuss protests across the Middle East, and not the Benghazi incident specifically. Republicans, though, said the document is evidence the White House was pushing the narrative that the violence in Benghazi grew from anger over an anti-Islam YouTube to protect the president's bid for reelection.

“Trey Gowdy is as dogged, focused, and serious-minded as they come,” Boehner said in a statement announcing the appointment on Monday. “His background as a federal prosecutor and his zeal for the truth make him the ideal person to lead this panel.

“I know he shares my commitment to get to the bottom of this tragedy and will not tolerate any stonewalling from the Obama administration,” Boehner continued.

But Carney repeatedly dismissed the effort as conspiratorial and politically motivated.

"At some point you just have to assume Republicans will continue this because it feeds a political objective of some point," Carney said.

"The facts begin not to matter to those who fervently want to believe something else," he added.

Carney also chided Republicans for not focusing on issues "Americans really care about," like the economy.

"The effort to politicize this has continued unabated," Carney said.

House Democrats have not yet said whether they would participate in the select committee. Carney said the White House would leave it up to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on whether to participate.




Support the USO

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 246,270
Re: White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2014, 03:31:12 PM »
Get yourself a good lawyer Carney..you are up to your eyeballs in this cover-up

Support the USO

Offline Luis Gonzalez

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,439
    • Boiling Frogs
Re: White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2014, 03:42:56 PM »
Quote
Carney refused to answer questions directly about whether the White House would cooperate, but he noted that there had been 13 congressional hearings, 50 member-and staff briefings, and over 25,000 pages of documents produced over the September 11, 2012 terror attack, in which four Americans were killed.

And zero people in the administration held accountable for anything.
“[Euthanasia] is what any State medical service has sooner or later got to face. If you are going to be kept alive in institutions run by and paid for by the State, you must accept the State’s right to economize when necessary …” The Ministry of Fear by Graham Green (New York: Penguin Books [1943] 2005, p. 165).

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 16,476
Re: White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2014, 07:08:45 PM »
A positively Nixonian response.   :smokin:

Offline kevindavis

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,036
Re: White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2014, 08:00:05 PM »
Why the cover up?
"Die-hard conservatives thought that if I couldn't get everything I asked for, I should jump off the cliff with the flag flying-go down in flames. No, if I can get 70 or 80 percent of what it is I'm trying to get ... I'll take that and then continue to try to get the rest in the future."

Ronald Reagan

"We must continue to go into space for humanity.” - Dr. Stephen Hawking

Offline Luis Gonzalez

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,439
    • Boiling Frogs
Re: White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2014, 10:39:52 PM »
Why the cover up?

Republicans have managed to paint the administration into a corner.

If they don't own up to the cover up, they're exposed as abysmally incompetent to the degree of causing the death of four Americans.

I think that the GOP will probably start banging the incompetence drum as soon as Hillary hits the campaign trail.
“[Euthanasia] is what any State medical service has sooner or later got to face. If you are going to be kept alive in institutions run by and paid for by the State, you must accept the State’s right to economize when necessary …” The Ministry of Fear by Graham Green (New York: Penguin Books [1943] 2005, p. 165).

Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,744
  • Conspiracy engineer. Low rates.
Re: White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2014, 12:01:11 AM »
All the have to do is acknowledge responsibility. The adult thing to do. Not that the WH is occupied by adults, by the looks of things. Back during the Falklands, Reagan said up front and publicly that he wouldn't help the UK or Argentina. Wasn't pleasant - but he took responsibility for it. A hell of a lot of the badly wounded from the Sir Galahad mysteriously wound up at the Walter Reed Medical Center, though.

There are some details on Benghazi that simply will never come out - or at least not until we are all long gone. That is as it should be and needs to be from time to time, to cover assets in place and let them keep working without a double tap when they ain't expecting it.
The fastest way to a man's heart? Inch to the right of the breastbone, between the fourth and fifth rib.

Every time I start to feel boring, I remember there is a monthly magazine devoted to elevators.

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline evadR²

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,197
Re: White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2014, 12:32:28 AM »
White House may not cooperate....

...well, they haven't yet.
What has changed that would make one think they would?
November 6, 2012, a day in infamy...the death of a republic as we know it.

Offline Luis Gonzalez

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,439
    • Boiling Frogs
Re: White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2014, 01:09:18 AM »
All the have to do is acknowledge responsibility. The adult thing to do. Not that the WH is occupied by adults, by the looks of things. Back during the Falklands, Reagan said up front and publicly that he wouldn't help the UK or Argentina. Wasn't pleasant - but he took responsibility for it. A hell of a lot of the badly wounded from the Sir Galahad mysteriously wound up at the Walter Reed Medical Center, though.

There are some details on Benghazi that simply will never come out - or at least not until we are all long gone. That is as it should be and needs to be from time to time, to cover assets in place and let them keep working without a double tap when they ain't expecting it.

Acknowledging responsibility equals acknowledging incompetence.

The only chance they have is to continue to deny and obfuscate, and trying to make the whole thing appear to be a witch hunt.
“[Euthanasia] is what any State medical service has sooner or later got to face. If you are going to be kept alive in institutions run by and paid for by the State, you must accept the State’s right to economize when necessary …” The Ministry of Fear by Graham Green (New York: Penguin Books [1943] 2005, p. 165).


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf