Author Topic: So long, net neutrality? FCC to propose new pay-for-preferential treatment rules  (Read 160 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,786

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 23,836
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
The FCC is glaring at the EPA in indignation and angling for a bigger slice of the budget pie. The "case by case" line is the tip off.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,253
    • Auktion Online
Who says the OPapaDoc administration is not for sale?

I don't oppose getting rid of net neutrality, necessarily, but this is a reminder that the Internet is one big government-created oligopoly, and like all regulated industries it means the big players (in this case Comcast, AT&T, Verizon and the other ISP's) can buy influence.  Getting rid of net neutrality should be a reminder to everyone that government regulation does not exist to "protect" the public, but to empower the establishment.

Once the micro-economy of an industry is controlled, that's when they hose the consumer.  Look at education.  And if you like the price of tuition, wait a few years until the real cost of government health care becomes apparent.
« Last Edit: April 25, 2014, 11:24:04 AM by massadvj »
"She only coughs when she lies."

Offline Dexter

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,282
In 2007 Obama promised net neutrality.  :silly:
"I know one thing, that I know nothing."

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo