Author Topic: My $54,000 helicopter ride  (Read 278 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 264,175
My $54,000 helicopter ride
« on: April 21, 2014, 05:42:36 PM »,0,716287.story#axzz2zYkK3lSH

Out Here
My $54,000 helicopter ride
A much-touted benefit of the Affordable Care Act, the out-of-pocket limit doesn't exactly live up to its name.

April 20, 2014

One of the benefits of the Affordable Care Act that President Obama often touts is the limit it places on medical bills: no more than $6,350 annually per insured individual or $12,700 per family. The insurance industry's idea of an "out-of-pocket maximum," however, doesn't deliver on the promise implicit in its name, as I learned when my insurer told me I might owe half of a $54,000 ambulance bill.

My coverage from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois is exempt from the new limits because it predates the ACA, but it still has annual spending caps. The limits are $10,000 for services by providers in the plan's network and $20,000 for out-of-network services. As a Blue Cross Blue Shield representative patiently explained to me, however, the out-of-network limit isn't really a limit. When a customer reaches that amount, the insurer will still pay only the standard out-of-network share. That's why my plan covered only 50% of the $54,755 charged by Tristate Care Flight to ferry me (by helicopter) from a car wreck in Quartzsite, Ariz., to a hospital in Phoenix. If Tristate wanted to bill me for the other half, the representative explained, it was free to do so.

The healthcare law's out-of-pocket limit suffers from the same shortcoming. Once you reach it, your insurer will cover 100% of the cost only of the essential health benefits covered by the plan, and out-of-network services are exempt (except for emergency treatments).

That's a troubling thought, considering how many insurers are reducing the number of doctors and hospitals in their plans. These "narrow networks" increase the chances that a doctor, therapist or clinic you'd like to use won't be subject to the annual cap.

More ominously, being treated at an in-network hospital is no guarantee that the specialists who see you there will be in your plan's network as well. If there's no emergency involved, you could be stuck paying the difference between the contracted amount and the specialist's charges, even if you've hit the out-of-pocket limit. And the difference can be staggering: In one extreme example cited by the insurance industry, an out-of-network California pathologist charged $8,100 for a tissue exam for which Medicare reimburses $128.

My own story had a happy ending. After pointing out to Blue Cross Blue Shield that I couldn't have shopped around for an in-network helicopter ride, given that I was strapped to a back board with a broken neck, my insurer recognized that the bill was for emergency care. I'd already hit my out-of-pocket limit, so Blue Cross Blue Shield paid the entire cost of my flight.

Nevertheless, the episode taught me a sobering lesson about a much-touted benefit of the healthcare law. It's a great shield against financial ruin, but only if you know how to stay behind it.
--Jon Healey

Support the USO

Offline Chieftain

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
Re: My $54,000 helicopter ride
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2014, 05:49:27 PM »
yep...a Life Flight helicopter is damned expensive to operate, per hour.  Considering most run with a crew of at least three, counting maintenance costs and fuel, a couple of hours can get pretty expensive. 

Sounds like the writer's involvement with his own personal health care is what saved the day.  That personal involvement is a very good thing and something we all need to get back to, and quickly.

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo