Author Topic: The United States of SWAT? By John Fund  (Read 268 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 250,476
The United States of SWAT? By John Fund
« on: April 18, 2014, 08:30:41 AM »
http://www.nationalreview.com/node/376053/print

 NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE         
April 18, 2014 4:00 AM
The United States of SWAT?
Military-style units from government agencies are wreaking havoc on non-violent citizens.
By John Fund

Regardless of how people feel about Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s standoff with the federal Bureau of Land Management over his cattle’s grazing rights, a lot of Americans were surprised to see TV images of an armed-to-the-teeth paramilitary wing of the BLM deployed around Bundy’s ranch.

They shouldn’t have been. Dozens of federal agencies now have Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams to further an expanding definition of their missions. It’s not controversial that the Secret Service and the Bureau of Prisons have them. But what about the Department of Agriculture, the Railroad Retirement Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Office of Personnel Management, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? All of these have their own SWAT units and are part of a worrying trend towards the militarization of federal agencies — not to mention local police forces.

“Law-enforcement agencies across the U.S., at every level of government, have been blurring the line between police officer and soldier,” journalist Radley Balko writes in his 2013 book Rise of the Warrior Cop. “The war on drugs and, more recently, post-9/11 antiterrorism efforts have created a new figure on the U.S. scene: the warrior cop — armed to the teeth, ready to deal harshly with targeted wrongdoers, and a growing threat to familiar American liberties.”

The proliferation of paramilitary federal SWAT teams inevitably brings abuses that have nothing to do with either drugs or terrorism. Many of the raids they conduct are against harmless, often innocent, Americans who typically are accused of non-violent civil or administrative violations.

Take the case of Kenneth Wright of Stockton, Calif., who was “visited” by a SWAT team from the U.S. Department of Education in June 2011. Agents battered down the door of his home at 6 a.m., dragged him outside in his boxer shorts, and handcuffed him as they put his three children (ages 3, 7, and 11) in a police car for two hours while they searched his home. The raid was allegedly intended to uncover information on Wright’s estranged wife, Michelle, who hadn’t been living with him and was suspected of college financial-aid fraud.

The year before the raid on Wright, a SWAT team from the Food and Drug Administration raided the farm of Dan Allgyer of Lancaster, Pa. His crime was shipping unpasteurized milk across state lines to a cooperative of young women with children in Washington, D.C., called Grass Fed on the Hill. Raw milk can be sold in Pennsylvania, but it is illegal to transport it across state lines. The raid forced Allgyer to close down his business.

Brian Walsh, a senior legal analyst with the Heritage Foundation, says it is inexplicable why so many federal agencies need to be battle-ready: “If these agencies occasionally have a legitimate need for force to execute a warrant, they should be required to call a real law-enforcement agency, one that has a better sense of perspective. The FBI, for example, can draw upon its vast experience to determine whether there is an actual need for a dozen SWAT agents.”

Since 9/11, the feds have issued a plethora of homeland-security grants that encourage local police departments to buy surplus military hardware and form their own SWAT units. By 2005, at least 80 percent of towns with a population between 25,000 and 50,000 people had their own SWAT team. The number of raids conducted by local police SWAT teams has gone from 3,000 a year in the 1980s to over 50,000 a year today.

Once SWAT teams are created, they will be used. Nationwide, they are used for standoffs, often serious ones, with bad guys. But at other times they’ve been used for crimes that hardly warrant military-style raids. Examples include angry dogs, domestic disputes, and misdemeanor marijuana possession. In 2010, a Phoenix, Ariz., sheriff’s SWAT team that included a tank and several armored vehicles raided the home of Jesus Llovera. The tank, driven by the newly deputized action-film star Steven Seagal, plowed right into Llovera’s house. The incident was filmed and, together with footage of Seagal-accompanied immigration raids, was later used for Seagal’s A&E TV law-enforcement reality show.

The crime committed by Jesus Llovera was staging cockfights. During the sheriff’s raid, his dog was killed, and later all of his chickens were put to sleep.

Many veteran law-enforcement figures have severe qualms about the turn police work is taking. One retired veteran of a large metropolitan police force told me: “I was recently down at police headquarters for a meeting. Coincidently, there was a promotion ceremony going on and the SWAT guys looked just like members of the Army, except for the police shoulder patches. Not an image I would cultivate. It leads to a bad mindset.”

Indeed, the U.S. Constitution’s Third Amendment, against the quartering of troops in private homes, was part of an overall reaction against the excesses of Britain’s colonial law enforcement. “It wasn’t the stationing of British troops in the colonies that irked patriots in Boston and Virginia,” Balko writes. “It was England’s decision to use the troops for everyday law enforcement.”

There are things that can be done to curb the abuses without taking on the politically impossible job of disbanding SWAT units. The feds should stop shipping military vehicles to local police forces. Federal SWAT teams shouldn’t be used to enforce regulations, but should focus instead on potentially violent criminals. Cameras mounted on the dashboards of police cars have both brought police abuses to light and exonerated officers who were falsely accused of abuse. SWAT-team members could be similarly equipped with helmet cameras.

After all, if taxpayers are being asked to foot the bill and cede ground on their Fourth Amendment rights, they have the right to a transparent, accountable record of just what is being done in their name.

Support the USO

Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 21,882
  • French entertainment is a waste of mime.
Re: The United States of SWAT? By John Fund
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2014, 08:45:53 AM »
Quote
“If these agencies occasionally have a legitimate need for force to execute a warrant, they should be required to call a real law-enforcement agency, one that has a better sense of perspective. The FBI, for example, can draw upon its vast experience to determine whether there is an actual need for a dozen SWAT agents.”

I say this constantly. Policing and soldiering are two completely different skill sets. Poles apart. It's why front line troops that retire make really shitty cops. Different aims, different training.
Anyone who tells you you can't buy happiness has never been in a book store or an animal shelter.

You are the result of 3 billion years of evolutionary success. Act like it.

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,083
    • Auktion Online
Re: The United States of SWAT? By John Fund
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2014, 08:59:44 AM »
Personally, I prefer they go in as jack booted thugs because the optics are much more suited to what is going on.  Thousands of land owners have given up their land to nice guys wearing suits, carrying concealed weapons and using warrants.  When tanks are in play, then people understand what is really going on.
"She only coughs when she lies."

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,168
Re: The United States of SWAT? By John Fund
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2014, 10:49:58 PM »
massadvj wrote above:
[[ Thousands of land owners have given up their land to nice guys wearing suits, carrying concealed weapons and using warrants.  When tanks are in play, then people understand what is really going on. ]]

Excellent observation.

Calls to mind a verse from "Pretty Boyd Floyd":
  As through this life I ramble
  I seen lots of funny men
  Some will rob you with six gun,
  And some with a fountain pen...
 
  But as through this life I ramble
  As through this life I roam
  I never seen militias
  That drive families from their homes

(apologies to Woody Guthrie for alterations on the second stanza!)
« Last Edit: April 18, 2014, 10:51:46 PM by Fishrrman »

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
Re: The United States of SWAT? By John Fund
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2014, 11:44:13 PM »
Personally, I prefer they go in as jack booted thugs because the optics are much more suited to what is going on.  Thousands of land owners have given up their land to nice guys wearing suits, carrying concealed weapons and using warrants.  When tanks are in play, then people understand what is really going on.

Good points, but I do have mixed feelings on this.  I think back to the hunt for the Boston marathon bombers, and the incredible number of very heavily armed police/paramilitary going house to house and finally cornering the bomber in someone's back yard. 

On one hand I am incredibly grateful there were plenty of rough men ready to do harm to those two assholes on behalf of everyone killed and injured in the bombings.  On the gripping hand, it frightens me how quickly the high tech hardware and military grade arms and ammo come out when the bad boys want to play. 

Locally, we have had some pretty rough boys decide to take on the cops, and we just had an officer shot and wounded in the line of duty and his police dog shot to death this week, by one miscreant who has been leading a gang of burglars that decided to run and shoot at the cops.  They were caught breaking in to a police supply store, and there is no telling what they had planned once they got their hands on whatever they were seeking.  As it was, there was one suspect who E&E'd through sleeping neighborhoods sporting an AR-15 he had just shot a cop and killed a police dog with.  They finally caught him alive, but he was little different than some jihadi with an AK in Afghanistan....and many of our local cops have spent lots of time in the sandbox.....

Again....mixed feelings on all of this.  At what point do we become the Ukraine??

« Last Edit: April 18, 2014, 11:45:56 PM by Chieftain »

Offline SouthTexas

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,667
The United States of SWAT?
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2014, 12:46:54 PM »
The United States of SWAT?

National Review Online
 By John Fund

Regardless of how people feel about Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s standoff with the federal Bureau of Land Management over his cattle’s grazing rights, a lot of Americans were surprised to see TV images of an armed-to-the-teeth paramilitary wing of the BLM deployed around Bundy’s ranch.

They shouldn’t have been. Dozens of federal agencies now have Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams to further an expanding definition of their missions. It’s not controversial that the Secret Service and the Bureau of Prisons have them. But what about the Department of Agriculture, the Railroad Retirement Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Office of Personnel Management, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? All of these have their own SWAT units and are part of a worrying trend towards the militarization of federal agencies — not to mention local police forces.

“Law-enforcement agencies across the U.S., at every level of government, have been blurring the line between police officer and soldier,” journalist Radley Balko writes in his 2013 book Rise of the Warrior Cop. “The war on drugs and, more recently, post-9/11 antiterrorism efforts have created a new figure on the U.S. scene: the warrior cop — armed to the teeth, ready to deal harshly with targeted wrongdoers, and a growing threat to familiar American liberties.”

The proliferation of paramilitary federal SWAT teams inevitably brings abuses that have nothing to do with either drugs or terrorism. Many of the raids they conduct are against harmless, often innocent, Americans who typically are accused of non-violent civil or administrative violations.

Take the case of Kenneth Wright of Stockton, Calif., who was “visited” by a SWAT team from the U.S. Department of Education in June 2011. Agents battered down the door of his home at 6 a.m., dragged him outside in his boxer shorts, and handcuffed him as they put his three children (ages 3, 7, and 11) in a police car for two hours while they searched his home. The raid was allegedly intended to uncover information on Wright’s estranged wife, Michelle, who hadn’t been living with him and was suspected of college financial-aid fraud.

The year before the raid on Wright, a SWAT team from the Food and Drug Administration raided the farm of Dan Allgyer of Lancaster, Pa. His crime was shipping unpasteurized milk across state lines to a cooperative of young women with children in Washington, D.C., called Grass Fed on the Hill. Raw milk can be sold in Pennsylvania, but it is illegal to transport it across state lines. The raid forced Allgyer to close down his business.....

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/376053/united-states-swat-john-fund


Online 240B

  • Lord of all things Orange!
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,435
Re: The United States of SWAT?
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2014, 01:11:22 PM »
Is there any rational person on the face of the Earth who can explain why the Post Office needs guns, tanks, and ammunition? What the hell is going on!?
 
 U.S. Postal Service Announces Giant Ammo Purchase   
 
http://www.infowars.com/u-s-postal-service-announces-giant-ammo-purchase/
You cannot "COEXIST" with people who want to kill you.

Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 21,882
  • French entertainment is a waste of mime.
Re: The United States of SWAT?
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2014, 03:47:59 PM »
Is there any rational person on the face of the Earth who can explain why the Post Office needs guns, tanks, and ammunition? What the hell is going on!?
 
 U.S. Postal Service Announces Giant Ammo Purchase   
 
http://www.infowars.com/u-s-postal-service-announces-giant-ammo-purchase/


They added zombies to the "Neither snow nor rain" line?

Or they expect their employees to now go postal, and it's a perk?
Anyone who tells you you can't buy happiness has never been in a book store or an animal shelter.

You are the result of 3 billion years of evolutionary success. Act like it.

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline SouthTexas

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,667
Re: The United States of SWAT? By John Fund
« Reply #8 on: April 20, 2014, 07:00:10 PM »
Sorry Myst, I did search and got nothing.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf