Author Topic: Howard Dean: Dems would win back House if not for health-care Web site woes  (Read 401 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 246,366
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/04/15/howard-dean-dems-would-win-back-house-if-not-for-health-care-web-site-woes//?print=1

Howard Dean: Dems would win back House if not for health-care Web site woes

Former Vermont governor Howard Dean (D) says Democrats would be in strong position to win back the U.S. House majority this year if not for the troubled rollout of the federal health-care Web site last fall.

"I think we would have won the House had the Web site not collapsed," Dean, a former Democratic National Committee chairman, said in a brief interview with Post Politics Tuesday evening. He called the battle for the House a "struggle" for Democrats but predicted the party would retain control of the Senate.

The flawed rollout of the health-care Web site "was a problem because we had [Republicans] on the run after the government shutdown," Dean said.

Dean was in Arlington to stump for former Virginia lieutenant governor Don Beyer (D), who is running for the seat being vacated by retiring Rep. James P. Moran (D-Va.). Beyer was Dean's 2004 presidential campaign treasurer.

As for 2016, Dean reiterated that he supports the idea of former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton (D) running for president.

Support the USO

Offline Millee

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,427
Because the economy is so robust???   :whistle:

Online jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,500
  • ^^ Actual picture of me.
    • Fullervision
And if a horse had stripes, it'd be a zebra.

The fact is that mandating everybody rush to one Web site at the same time will invariably cause some sort of bandwidth trouble. That site was doomed to fail, because the very nature of the law provoked the high traffic that brings sites like that down.
STILL a proud supporter of the Free Conservative Resistance

"Just because people in positions of authority are stupid, it doesn’t mean you have to go along with it." —Arlo Guthrie

Online truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 15,595
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
And if a horse had stripes, it'd be a zebra.

The fact is that mandating everybody rush to one Web site at the same time will invariably cause some sort of bandwidth trouble. That site was doomed to fail, because the very nature of the law provoked the high traffic that brings sites like that down.
Facebook, Amazon, etc. handle large volumes. Why couldn't a government site do likewise?
#NeverHillary

Online jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,500
  • ^^ Actual picture of me.
    • Fullervision
Facebook, Amazon, etc. handle large volumes. Why couldn't a government site do likewise?
The business models are different.

For one, sites like Amazon and Facebook slowly grew into the leviathans they are today; they weren't just sites that sprang up and then one day directed all of their customers to shop there at once, as the publicizing of the first and last days to enroll effectively did. Besides, Amazon has an absolutely huge amount of excess bandwidth (to handle holiday loads), something that probably isn't practical at the government level.
STILL a proud supporter of the Free Conservative Resistance

"Just because people in positions of authority are stupid, it doesn’t mean you have to go along with it." —Arlo Guthrie

Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,797
  • Conspiracy engineer. Low rates.
The business models are different.

For one, sites like Amazon and Facebook slowly grew into the leviathans they are today; they weren't just sites that sprang up and then one day directed all of their customers to shop there at once, as the publicizing of the first and last days to enroll effectively did. Besides, Amazon has an absolutely huge amount of excess bandwidth (to handle holiday loads), something that probably isn't practical at the government level.

We normally agree. But in this case, no. They had 4 damned years, near enough.
The fastest way to a man's heart? Inch to the right of the breastbone, between the fourth and fifth rib.

Every time I start to feel boring, I remember there is a monthly magazine devoted to elevators.

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Online jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,500
  • ^^ Actual picture of me.
    • Fullervision
We normally agree. But in this case, no. They had 4 damned years, near enough.
In theory yes. Yet because they took no customers in those four years they had no idea how much of a load their servers could handle... and as a result the code was bloated and dragged down the whole site.

Now, could they have hired some professional hackers to stress-test the site with DDoS attacks? I suppose.
STILL a proud supporter of the Free Conservative Resistance

"Just because people in positions of authority are stupid, it doesn’t mean you have to go along with it." —Arlo Guthrie

Offline olde north church

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,136
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDwODbl3muE" target="_blank" class="aeva_link bbc_link new_win">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDwODbl3muE</a>



Why?  Well, because I'm a bastard, that's why.

Offline PzLdr

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,421
Howie!

PzLdr: Germans would've taken Moscow if it hadn't snowed.  :smokin:
Hillary's Self-announced Qualifications: She Stood Up To Putin...She Sits to Pee


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf