Author Topic: WSJ Columnist: Nominate Rand Paul Because GOP Needs 'Another Humbling Landslide Defeat'  (Read 518 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 382,604
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/rand-paul-for-president-bret-stephens-gop-landslide-defeat

TOM KLUDT – APRIL 15, 2014, 11:25 AM EDT

Wall Street Journal columnist Bret Stephens revisited one of his favorite themes on Monday, arguing once again that what Republicans really need is another defeat in a national election.

According to Stephens, a Rand Paul presidential nomination in 2016 ought to do the trick. The columnist offered an endorsement of the Kentucky Senator that oozed with sarcasm.

Quote
No, what we need as the Republican nominee in 2016 is a man of more glaring disqualifications. Someone so nakedly unacceptable to the overwhelming majority of sane Americans that only the GOP could think of nominating him.
This man is Rand Paul, the junior senator from a state with eight electoral votes. The man who, as of this writing, has three years worth of experience in elected office. Barack Obama had more political experience when he ran for president. That's worked out well.

Stephens took aim at Paul's former staffer Jack Hunter, whose troubling past includes a defense of Abraham Lincoln assassin John Wilkes Booth. The Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist also mocked Paul's suggestion in 2009 that Dick Cheney wanted a war in Iraq to deliver profits to Halliburton.

Quote
If Mr. Paul wants to accuse the former vice president of engineering a war in Iraq so he could shovel some profits over to his past employer, he should come out and say so explicitly. Ideally at the next Heritage Action powwow. Let's not mince words. This man wants to be the Republican nominee for president.

And so he should be. Because maybe what the GOP needs is another humbling landslide defeat. When moderation on a subject like immigration is ideologically disqualifying, but bark-at-the-moon lunacy about Halliburton is not, then the party has worse problems than merely its choice of nominee.

This isn't new territory for Stephens. Anticipating President Obama's eventual re-election, Stephens wrote in early-2012 that "Republicans deserve to lose."

A week after the GOP's disappointing showing in the election that year, Stephens urged the party to "get a grip." He wrote that the GOP base should "demand an IQ exam as well as a test of basic knowledge from our congressional and presidential candidates." He also called on Republicans to stop "demonizing Latin American immigrants" and "tone down the abortion extremism."

"Our republican experiment in self-government didn't die last week," Stephens wrote following the election. "But a useful message has been sent to a party that spent too much of the past four years listening intently to echoes of itself. Change the channel for a little while."
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline alicewonders

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,021
  • Gender: Female
  • Live life-it's too short to butt heads w buttheads
Here's an idea - why don't we let the people nominate the candidate they want - and stop letting the media, manipulated polls, liberals and elites tell us who can and cannot win?
Don't tread on me.   8888madkitty

We told you Trump would win - bigly!

Offline musiclady

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,682
Here's an idea - why don't we let the people nominate the candidate they want - and stop letting the media, manipulated polls, liberals and elites tell us who can and cannot win?

 :amen:
Character still matters.  It always matters.

I wear a mask as an exercise in liberty and love for others.  To see it as an infringement of liberty is to entirely miss the point.  Be kind.

"Sometimes I think the Church would be better off if we would call a moratorium on activity for about six weeks and just wait on God to see what He is waiting to do for us. That's what they did before Pentecost."   - A. W. Tozer

Use the time God is giving us to seek His will and feel His presence.

Oceander

  • Guest
Other than an obvious personal hatred for Rand, what is the basis for this guy's conclusions?  And whom is he pimping for, Jeb Bush?

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
IMHO, Rand as Rand is fine, but his biggest problem is his father and the political baggage that comes with that, including shared staff and grassroots leaders (Jack Hunter is a good example). He will need to distance himself from the likes of Hunter, Rockwell, and the like. He has done a good job charting his own course but he needs to remain his own man and not an extension of his father.

Offline Slide Rule

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,529
  • Gender: Male
Hard to hear that Rand is not the one? A rino is not the one either.

Of course this is a very old conversation.

Al
« Last Edit: April 15, 2014, 11:30:11 pm by Slide Rule »
White, American, MAGA, 3% Neanderthal, and 97% Extreme Right Wing Conservative.

Recommended

J Boswell, The Life of Samuel Johnson
E Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France
N Davies, Europe: A History
R Feynman, The Feynman Lectures on Physics
R Penrose, The Road To Reality & The Emperor's New Mind
K Popper, An Open Society and Its Enemies & The Logic of Scientific Discovery
A Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago, & Everything he wrote

Offline jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,355
  • Gender: Male
  • Realistic nihilist
    • Fullervision
Other than an obvious personal hatred for Rand, what is the basis for this guy's conclusions?  And whom is he pimping for, Jeb Bush?
Sounds like he's looking for another Jon Huntsman type candidate.
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2024