Author Topic: Al Sharpton was eager to deal drugs says pal  (Read 200 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65,502
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Al Sharpton was eager to deal drugs says pal
« on: April 13, 2014, 07:05:29 AM »

Al Sharpton Was Eager To Deal Drugs Says Pal
by Whoopie • 12 April, 2014 • Celeb, Crime, Culture, Music, Politics • 0 Comments

Couldn’t wait to be the dope dealing king pin of the ghetto…

DURHAM, NC — A drug trafficker who worked for Al Sharpton’s nonprofit in the 1980s said that despite the preacher’s denials, he was eager to get a slice of the lucrative drug deal captured on FBI surveillance video.

“It was greed. He just wanted money,” Robert Curington, 72, told The Post during a two-day interview at his North Carolina home, detailing for the first time how Sharpton stepped into the FBI’s trap — and was then forced to become a federal informant.

Read much more:

Entrapped my a$$. Al “Fat Rat” Sharpton couldn’t wait to make a drug deal with an FBI informant whom he thought had mafia connections.

He planned to use his tax exempt ‘non-profit’ network of black hoodlum youths (the National Youth Network) to spread the poison around the ‘hood’. A share of that dirty money would go into the coffers of the Democrat Party in exchange for protection.

That youth network was the precursor to his ‘National Action Network’ an organization that must have funneled a ton of “campaign contributions” to the DNC considering how many Democrat celebs (most recently the two top black gangsters, Obama and his under boss Eric Holder) have lined up to speak and lend “credibility” to the phony baloney Reverend Al.

james Brown funeral
“Fat Rat” gangster “Reverend” Al Sharpton posing with the corpse of James “The Godfather” Brown

By the way, if clowns like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are genuine Reverends, than I’m a Southern Colonel y’all.

But we’re getting a glimpse of how the Democrat Party raises it’s dirty money and why they feel it’s so important to keep conservatives from horning in on their racket. I wonder if Lois Lerner appreciates her role in all of this?

Ya know, when you consider the financial advantage the Democrats have thanks to their money laundering racket on top of their willingness to employ vote fraud, you have to wonder what a genuinely fair election would look like in America.

I suspect outside of the major urban areas with concentrations of ethnic minorities, Democrat candidates would routinely be defeated in a landslide.

So why do the authorities tolerate this blatant criminality by a major political Party? Because you can’t pretend to be a democracy with only one Party (the GOP) perpetually in control. You need at least two viable political Parties to create the illusion of democracy and give the citizens a choice come election day.

On the other hand, the prevailing powers don’t want a mish-mash of tiny Parties like they have in other countries either. They don’t want to have to share control with hastily cobbled together ‘ruling coalitions’. Although I suspect that the Democrat’s ruling coalition would always consist of the Communists, Greens, Socialists, Unionists and organized crime factions.

Yet many Americans would willing vote Democrat, if only because they think that being ruled over by rich criminal racketeers is somehow better than being ruled over by rich corporate CEOs.

Well the joke is on them. You see, crooks and gangsters only know how to take. They don’t know how to create. That’s why this country has been in a virtual recession (a jobless recovery in the parlance of the Democrat controlled media) since Obama has been in power and why our country keeps sinking deeper in debt.

When voters finally get tired of the ‘takers’ being charge, maybe they’ll put the ‘makers’ back in charge so we can rebuild the nation before the fickle masses decide once again to hand the reins of power back over to the hoodlum class.

Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo