Author Topic: Attacking Jews is fine (at Brandeis), but attacking muslims is not, apparently  (Read 131 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,520
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Attacking Jews is fine, but attacking Muslims is not, apparently

 By Ashe Schow  | APRIL 9, 2014 AT 1:11 PM

Topics: Beltway Confidential Education Islamic Jihad Freedom of Speech Political Correctness

It appears that anyone who speaks up about the horrors perpetrated against women in the Middle East is an “Islamophobe,” according to the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

CAIR has succeeded in convincing Brandeis University to not give human rights advocate Ayaan Hirsi Ali an honorary degree because the Muslim-born woman speaks out about how women are treated in the Middle East.

CAIR wrote Tuesday to Brandeis President Frederick M. Lawrence, accusing Ali of “spew[ing] anti-Muslim hate” and “call[ing] for violence against the entire Muslim world.”

As evidence, CAIR noted an interview Ali gave to Reason Magazine, citing several quotes from Ali to paint her as an extremist and racist.
Forget the fact that Ali was raised in a religious family in North Africa, forget the fact that she suffered female genital mutilation as a child and forget the fact that she fled to escape an arranged marriage. And that she received death threats from Islamist extremists for her role in "Submission," a short film about abuse of women in the Muslim world. The film's producer, her friend Theo Van Gogh, was assassinated in 2004 by an Islamist extremist.

Of course, ignore the fact that Ali also said the reason that Islam must be defeated is “ecause right now, the political side of Islam, the power-hungry expansionist side of Islam, has become superior to the Sufis and the Ismailis and the peace-seeking Muslims.”

Ali said in that interview that the current state of Islam must be defeated so that it can “mutate into something peaceful.”

CAIR also asked if Brandeis would "remain silent if a similar honor was offered to an individual who said 'we are at war with Judaisms,' that all Jewish schools in America should be closed and that the Constitution should be changed to deny rights to members of the Jewish community?"

Funny thing about that is, Brandeis honored Tony Kushner and Desmond Tutu, both of whom espoused anti-Jewish sentiments.

Brandeis' official reason for caving to CAIR was that the university could not “overlook certain of her past statements that are inconsistent with Brandeis University's core values.”

So, it's okay to attack the Jewish community, but Muslims are off-limits? Such diversity, especially given the fact that Brandeis is named after the first Jewish Supreme Court justice, Louis Brandeis, a champion of free speech.
« Last Edit: April 09, 2014, 03:41:11 PM by rangerrebew »
There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics. There must be a positive passion for the public good, the public interest, honour, power and glory, established in the minds of the people, or there can be no republican government, nor any real liberty: and this public passion must be superior to all private passions. John Adams

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo