0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,901
  • There's no one out there quite like me.
    • Fullervision
(Capitalization part of the original article)

Released April 9, 2014

American voters dislike a politician who abuses official power more than an elected official caught in an extra-marital affair, according to a Quinnipiac University National Poll released today.
The independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University presented voters with a theoretical congressman – James Miller – whose “main concern in office is developing policies to help middle-class, working families.” Miller was described as 53, married, with two children.
While he is not identified as Republican or Democrat, 83 percent of voters have a “very favorable” or “somewhat favorable” opinion of him, and 65 percent say they “definitely” or “probably” would vote for his reelection.
Some voters were told that Miller was “unfaithful to his wife with another woman.” Among those voters, only 36 percent have a “very favorable” or “somewhat favorable” opinion, with 58 percent “somewhat unfavorable” or “very unfavorable.” A total of 39 percent say they definitely or probably would vote for him, while 49 percent say they definitely or probably would not vote for him.
Another group of voters were told “Miller created a new, well-paid position on his staff in order to hire an unqualified family member as a favor.” In that group, 22 percent have a very or somewhat favorable view, with 75 percent somewhat or very unfavorable. Only 24 percent definitely or probably would vote for him, with 67 percent who definitely or probably would not.
“Voters clearly see a difference between personal and official scandals. Committing adultery is far less damaging to a politician than abusing their office,” said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
“Whether it was adultery or abuse of power, our scandal-ridden politician was unable to secure a majority for reelection, reflecting an underlying reluctance on the part of American voters to support transgressors,” Malloy added.
Voters have less tolerance for Miller when hypocrisy is added as a factor in the sex scandal. In a scenario where a Miller priority is “promoting moral values,” and then the extramarital affair is mentioned, overall favorability drops to 25 percent, with 68 percent unfavorable. Only 28 percent say they are likely to vote for him, down from 39 percent in the neutral or non-hypocritical scenario.
In a scenario where a Miller priority is “cleaning up government,” followed by the fact that he hired a family member, favorability is at 24 percent, compared to 22 percent in the neutral scenario. Only 21 percent say they definitely or probably would vote for him, compared to 24 percent in the neutral scenario.
An official scandal also affects voter judgment of the politician’s ability to do the job: 43 percent of voters describe the Miller who hired a family member as unlikely to do a good job in office, but only 31 percent describe the adulterer version that way.
When it comes to personal integrity, however, the script flips: 57 percent say the unfaithful Miller lacks personal integrity, compared to 49 percent who say so about the power-abusing version.
From March 26 – 31, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,578 registered voters nationwide with a margin of error of +/- 2.5 percentage points. Live interviewers call land lines and cell phones.
The Quinnipiac University Poll, directed by Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D., conducts public opinion surveys in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Ohio, Virginia, Iowa, Colorado and the nation as a public service and for research.

Crosstabs at the link.
"Just because people in positions of authority are stupid, it doesn’t mean you have to go along with it." —Arlo Guthrie

"In the excitement of great popular elections, deciding the policy of the country, and its vast patronage, frauds will be committed, if a chance is given for them." —Richard Henry Dana, Jr.

Online massadvj

  • Editorial Advisor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,139
    • Auktion Online
I have known this for a long time.

I remember when Governor Edwin Edwards of Louisiana held a press conference to announce that he had personally "won" a million dollars in Las Vegas, and oh by the way gambling will soon be legal in New Orleans.  The people of the state smiled proudly at the audacity of it, proud of their corrupt political heritage.  Bill Clinton operates in much the same vein.

OPapaDoc, on the other hand, pretends to be a "messiah" who is going to deliver us from all of the ills of the world, even as he practices Chicago politics.  That makes him even more evil than Edwards or Clinton, in my book.

"She only coughs when she lies."

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo