Author Topic: Democrats don’t spike ball after ObamaCare enrollment win  (Read 204 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 246,156
Democrats don’t spike ball after ObamaCare enrollment win
« on: April 03, 2014, 10:02:38 AM »
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/202523-dems-dont-spike-ball-on-obamacare

Democrats don’t spike ball after ObamaCare enrollment win

By Mike Lillis - 04/03/14 06:00 AM EDT

Democrats on Capitol Hill are treading carefully in the wake of this week’s surprise enrollment success for President Obama’s healthcare reform law.

While lawmakers are hailing the news that 7.1 million people have gained insurance through ObamaCare exchanges ahead of the first enrollment deadline — a number exceeding the initial goal set by the administration — many are also eager to direct the focus away from the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and concentrate instead on bread-and-butter economic issues ahead of November’s midterms.

“Elections are always about jobs,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Tuesday. “So I think that, while … we’re proud of the Affordable Care Act, we now pivot to job creation.”

House Democratic leaders emerged Wednesday from their weekly caucus meeting to trumpet an economic agenda that focuses on raising the minimum wage, extending jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed and overhauling the nation’s immigration system. And while a handful of Senate Democrats staged a Tuesday press briefing to cheer Obama-Care enrollment, there were, notably, no vulnerable Democrats in attendance.

Their desire to shift the emphasis, even after a week of good press is, at least in part, a concession that the healthcare law remains a liability for Democrats, particularly in swing areas they’re hoping to pick up in the House and keep in the Senate.

And it’s a political liability some members readily acknowledge, even as they’re defending the law’s underlying policies and touting its benefits.

“When you consider that the ACA has been trashed for four years, and people have been led to believe there are really death panels, and you’re going to end up with rationed healthcare, a substantial portion of the American public still believes that stuff,” Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) said Wednesday. “Our goal is to win the election.”

Cleaver said he’ll soon head to Arizona to campaign for an unnamed Democrat in a close race — and he’ll be avoiding the topic of ObamaCare.

“I’m not going out there talking about the Affordable Care Act,” he said. “I’m not … going to go to a district that’s just on the line — a possibility for us — and start damaging people. That’s crazy.”

Obama on Tuesday was quick to trumpet the new enrollment figures, which came at the end of an open enrollment period that was severely crippled by the botched rollout of the administration’s online marketplace. The president went after the critics for cheering for the law to fail.

“I don’t get it,” Obama said from the Rose Garden. “Why are folks working so hard for people not to have health insurance? Why are they so mad about folks having health insurance?”

But even as the president was highlighting the success of his signature domestic achievement, Democratic leaders were shifting their message toward the economy.

“That’s the debate that the election will be about, jobs and the budget,” Pelosi said.

“We’re not running on healthcare, but we’re not running away from it,” she added.

Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Steve Israel is also downplaying the significance of the enrollment success on November’s midterms, telling reporters Wednesday, “it’s too early to say whether the tide has turned” in favor of the law.

The New York Democrat argued that, while Republicans’ ACA repeal efforts would alienate independent voters, the Democrats’ central campaign message would revolve around the contrast between his party’s economic priorities and those outlined this week in Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) budget proposal.

“This,” Israel told reporters at the National Press Club, “will be the defining issue in the midterm elections.”

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) said reaching the enrollment goal will help the Democrats defensively, while the Democrats’ economic priorities will provide the offense.

“That [reaching 7 million enrollees] was a redemptive moment for many [Democrats],” he said Wednesday. “And I think, as a consequence … many of us won’t have to run defending the healthcare law over and over again, and we can concentrate on other things.”

But at least one Democrat is hoping the Obama administration will minimize the public prominence of the ACA ahead of the elections, even when good news like the 7 million enrollments comes along.

“Frankly,” Cleaver said, “I hope the people in the White House don’t push that too far.”

Support the USO

Offline Dexter

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,221
Re: Democrats don’t spike ball after ObamaCare enrollment win
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2014, 10:45:46 AM »
Why are people surprised that mandated healthcare is getting enrollment? That's like forcing somebody to do something at gunpoint and then celebrating your success when they comply.
"I know one thing, that I know nothing."
-Socrates

Online Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42,735
  • #NeverTrumpForever
Re: Democrats don’t spike ball after ObamaCare enrollment win
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2014, 02:34:56 PM »
Why are people surprised that mandated healthcare is getting enrollment? That's like forcing somebody to do something at gunpoint and then celebrating your success when they comply.

or even worse, under threat of an IRS audit.

Online truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 15,544
  • Common sense results oriented conservatism
Re: Democrats don’t spike ball after ObamaCare enrollment win
« Reply #3 on: April 03, 2014, 02:57:15 PM »
I know two women that signed up. I talked with them, and we agreed it was in their interest to do so, even though as a matter of political principle they opposed it.

One single, self-supporting in her mid-50s. Her insurance will cost her much less than whatever she could have gotten, with her pre-existing conditions.

The other aged 63 has been self-insured for decades. Paid out of pocket for care, which meant only essentials. Now until Medicare she has a means to guard against financial ruin, in the event of a catastrophic situation.

IOW the government mandate urges them to take measures that are in their "informed best interest."

The underlying cost of health services to these individuals will likely be born out of governments' general funds, since apparently young-healthy 20-something males haven't been signing up out of the benevolence of their socialist little hearts.
#NeverHillary

Online Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42,735
  • #NeverTrumpForever
Re: Democrats don’t spike ball after ObamaCare enrollment win
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2014, 11:31:14 PM »
I know two women that signed up. I talked with them, and we agreed it was in their interest to do so, even though as a matter of political principle they opposed it.

One single, self-supporting in her mid-50s. Her insurance will cost her much less than whatever she could have gotten, with her pre-existing conditions.

The other aged 63 has been self-insured for decades. Paid out of pocket for care, which meant only essentials. Now until Medicare she has a means to guard against financial ruin, in the event of a catastrophic situation.

IOW the government mandate urges them to take measures that are in their "informed best interest."

The underlying cost of health services to these individuals will likely be born out of governments' general funds, since apparently young-healthy 20-something males haven't been signing up out of the benevolence of their socialist little hearts.

That's the thing:  there are two entirely different fields of operation:  the forest - the political landscape and the need to get rid of Obamacare before it destroys too much else - and the individual tree - the individual who needs insurance now for very legitimate reasons unconnected with the proto-fascism of the democrat party.

It's important to keep working in the two areas, but to make sure to keep them distinct from each other.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf