Author Topic: Blogger suggests WaPo, dem lawmakers coordinated on false story about Keystone and Koch brothers  (Read 133 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 69,626
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Keystone Coincidence

Blogger suggests WaPo, Dem lawmakers coordinated on false story about Keystone and Koch Brothers

BY:  Washington Free Beacon Staff
March 27, 2014 11:49 am

A pair of congressional Democrats are hyping debunked reporting on Koch Industries in an effort to tie them to the Keystone XL pipeline, leading a prominent conservative blogger to suggest coordination between the Washington Post and Democratic lawmakers.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D., R.I.) and Rep. Henry Waxman (D., Calif.) in a letter sent on Wednesday requested large amounts of information about Koch’s holdings in Canadian land above large crude oil deposits and its relationship with the Keystone XL pipeline.

Koch has no connection to the pipeline, has not taken a position on its construction, and would not benefit if the State Department decides to allow the project to move forward.

However, Waxman and Whitehouse’s letter cites “mounting evidence that Koch Industries has a financial interest in the Keystone XL pipeline.”

The bulk of that supposed evidence is attributed to a Post story that falsely claimed that Koch is “the biggest lease owner in Canada’s oil sands” and would benefit from the pipeline’s construction.

The Post, which sourced its reporting to a left-wing group that opposes the pipeline, was forced to walk back that claim when Powerline blogger John Hinderaker pointed out the many factual inaccuracies and distortions in its initial report.

The paper acknowledged that many of the claims made by the International Forum on Globalization, on which the Post story and the Waxman-Whitehouse letter are based, are factually suspect but defended its decision to broadcast those claims to its readers.

The Post writers admitted their story was designed to “stir and inflame public debate in this election year.” Hinderaker said that explanation demonstrates that their motives in writing it were “explicitly political.” As a result, Hinderaker asked whether or not the story was a “put-up job” from the beginning:

Coincidence? Maybe. But it seems likely that the Washington Post article was a put-up job, cobbled together and based on a ridiculous report written, apparently, by a couple of high school-age interns at the International Forum on Globalization, for the specific purpose of serving as the pretense for Whitehouse and Waxman to push the Democratic Party’s talking points. Is this what happened? I don’t know, but we would like to find out.

Opposition to the Kochs, who are generous donors to cancer research groups and institutions of the arts, is a key pillar of Democrats’ midterm election strategy.
« Last Edit: March 28, 2014, 05:46:26 AM by rangerrebew »
Constitutions are not designed for metaphysical or logical subtleties, for niceties of expression, for critical propriety, for elaborate shades of meaning, or for the exercise of philosophical acuteness or judicial research. They are instruments of a practical nature, founded on the common business of human life, adapted to common wants, designed for common use, and fitted for common understandings.

Joseph Story

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo