Author Topic: Obama administration: technically killing a human embryo is not abortion  (Read 241 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65,671
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Obama Administration: Technically, Killing a Human Embryo is Not an Abortion

Posted By Philip Hodges on Mar 25, 2014 | 43 Comments
gavel 2    

This is their most recent response to Hobby Lobby in Hobby Lobby’s lawsuit against the Department of Justice for mandating that their insurance cover abortifacients.

All along, the Obama administration had conceded to Hobby Lobby that drugs such as Plan B and Ella work by preventing a newly formed zygote from implanting in the mother’s uterus. If life begins at conception, that means that Hobby Lobby would be forced by Obamacare regulations to offer insurance that covers drugs which kill human lives. For that reason, Hobby Lobby is suing.

Even conventional medical literature define life as beginning at conception. Terence P. Jeffrey with CNS News highlighted the following:

According to a collection of citations posted on a Princeton University website, medical dictionaries, embryology texts, and a federal commission, have all defined fertilization as the beginning of a new human life with the formation of an embryo.

An “embryo,” says the Harper Collins Illustrated Medical Dictionary, is “[a]n organism in the earliest stage of development; in a man, from the time of conception to the end of the second month in the uterus.”

“The development of a human begins with fertilization, a process by which the spermatozoon from the male and the oocyte from the female unite to give rise to a new organism, the zygote,” says the text of Langman’s Medical Embryology.

An “embryo,” said the U.S. government’s 1997 National Bioethics Advisory Commission on Cloning Human Beings, is “the developing organism from the time of fertilization until significant differentiation has occurred, when the organism becomes known as a fetus.”

In spite of this common knowledge, the Obama administration is now saying that federal law establishes that since pregnancy begins at implantation, any termination of life that happens prior to implantation is not an abortion, per se. Sure, it’s still killing the same human life, but since it’s not legally an abortion, Hobby Lobby doesn’t have standing and shouldn’t be objecting to anything.

That’s like saying that drone-striking random people in Yemen or Pakistan isn’t murder per se, because we’re legally in a “war on terror.” Or a cop killing some homeless guy in the mountains isn’t theoretically murder, because they felt their “lives were threatened.” (Uh-huh.)

Abortion is murder whether it happens before or after implantation. Who cares how some stupid federal bureaucrat defined it?

« Last Edit: March 26, 2014, 03:20:31 PM by rangerrebew »
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Offline happyg

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,822
Then, why are so many killing something that isn't alive?

Offline mountaineer

  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 35,131
We all know "it" isn't human until it's born. Until then, it's only a potential human - which means, I suppose, it potentially is something else. A duck? A platypus? A Chevy Camaro?  :shrug:
The only difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Democrats allow the poor to be corrupt, too.
--- Oscar Levant

Online Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 45,490
  • #ToldYouSo
Then, why are so many killing something that isn't alive?

to play devil's advocate:  just because something isn't alive doesn't mean you don't remove it; after all, if one gets a splinter in one's thumb, one removes it even though the splinter isn't alive.

Offline rustynail

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 413
Obama administration: technically killing an infirmed aged is not extermination.

Offline happyg

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,822
We all know "it" isn't human until it's born. Until then, it's only a potential human - which means, I suppose, it potentially is something else. A duck? A platypus? A Chevy Camaro?  :shrug:

Yes, but we call removing a splinter just that, but even liberals call 'removing' a fetus as killing a fetus or embryo. We don't say we are killing a splinter.

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo