March 24, 2014
Pew Polling Reports That Even Among Obamacare Opponents, Most Want Their Congressmen to "Make Obamacare Work." Here's How They Got The Answer They Wanted.
It's a useful bit of propaganda for Obamacare supporters to say "Even those opposed to Obamacare still want their Congressmen to work to improve the system, to make it work."
Pew's supplied the Democrats with that very bandwagon-effect-promoting propaganda.
But did they get the answer they wanted fairly?
Well, imagine how you, personally, would inquire into the preferred course of action of Obamacare supporters. You might give them the options of "Work to improve it anyway," or "Stay out of the way of it/Let it collapse under its own weight," and so forth.
Here are the options -- two of them -- that Pew gave respondents to choose from:
What do you think elected officials who oppose the health care law should do now that the law has started to take effect? Should they [X] or should they [Y]?
Do what they can to make the law work as well as possible
Do what they can to make the law fail
Pew gave them a binary choice between "doing what they can to make the law work" and actively working to subvert and sabotage the law, and they present it as a meaningful bit of data that 30% supported the former choice, and only 19% the latter.
Now, there are those who do actually favor just that -- working to make the law fail. But very few people are at that level of decisiveness (decisive enough on this issue to decide the long-term harms of Obamacare justifies short-term "let it burn" pain).
Most people would still choose a less aggressive, underhanded-sounding response, like "Let it collapse under its own weight."
But Pew refuses respondents that choice, insisting that people either declare their desire to "make Obamacare work the best we can, by Golly!" or declare themselves hostage-taking terrorists of the sort often decried by one Harry Reid.
Why, you'd almost think that major institutions of the media are entirely captured by the political left or something.
Posted by Ace at 04:28 PM Comments http://ace.mu.nu/