This data shows the disparities starting in the youngest of children.

That is liberal code-speak for "disparate impact" which, boiled down to its essence, means that if you can show that there is a difference between the percentage of blacks in a given population and the percentage of people who are black and have suffered some negative effect, then that effect is presumed to be the result of racism, and it is then up to the presumed racist to do his/her/its damnedest to try and prove otherwise - that is, to prove a negative.

"Disparate impact" is, essentially, strict liability for racial discrimination.

It's really sad how so many people, including the Supreme Court (which helped construct the disparate impact nonsense), cannot fathom the basic fact that correlation does not imply causation.