Author Topic: Nancy Pelosi to accept award in the name of the famous Eugenicist, Margaret Sanger  (Read 267 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65,291
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Nancy Pelosi to Accept Award in the Name of the Famed Eugenicist Racist Margaret Sanger


March 22, 2014
By Sara Noble


Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PP)  announced that House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, an alleged Roman Catholic, will be given “the Margaret Sanger Award, the organization’s highest honor, in recognition of her leadership, excellence, and outstanding contributions to the reproductive health and rights movement over the course of her career,” according to a Planned Parenthood website posting.

It’s their “highest recognition of leadership, excellence, and outstanding contributions to the reproductive health and rights movement.”

Margaret Sanger was a Eugenicist whose name came up late last year when President Obama awarded the Medal of Freedom to that fighter for far-left women – Gloria Steinem. Steinem believes in “reproductive freedom” which includes abortions to the moment of birth.

A woman’s right to decide whether or when to have a child is not a ‘social issue’, it is a ‘human right,’ Steinem said upon receiving her medal. She doesn’t see any limit to women’s rights and unborn babies have no rights.

She accepted her Medal of Freedom to honor “the work of Margaret Sanger.”

Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist and probably a racist.

Sanger’s appearances at KKK rallies have been kept from the public as much as possible. One writer on Daily Kos, who claims to be a professor, actually said the KKK in the south wasn’t what it is now and “it wasn’t that much of a negative.”

The KKK in the south in Sanger’s time was a murderous band of bigots, contrary to what this professor seems to think.

She was happy to go to KKK rallies:

“I accepted an invitation to talk to the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan…I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and illuminated crosses…I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak…In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered.” (Margaret Sanger: An Autobiography, P.366)

In E. Drogin, Margaret Sanger: Father of Modern Society, CUL Publishers, 1980, Section 1, p. 18-24;

“Negroes and Southern Europeans are mentally inferior to native born Americans”

Sanger wrote in an article entitled “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda,” which appeared in the October 1921 edition of Birth Control Review, the following:

“In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation to the mentally and physically fit though less fertile parents of the educated and well-to-do classes,” she wrote. “On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.

“Possibly drastic and Spartan methods may be forced upon society if it continues complacently to encourage the chance and chaotic breeding that has resulted from our stupidly cruel sentimentalism,” she said.

Sanger wanted a new and improved race: ‘[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.’

Then there was the April 1932 Birth Control Review, p. 108

Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.

Let’s go to The Pivot of Civilization, 1922. Chapter on “The Cruelty of Charity,” pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library edition

“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying … demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism … [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant … We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”

She had a view of population control that would have made the Communist Chinese quite proud:

The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.

In her “Plan for Peace” from Birth Control Review (April 1932, pp. 107-108) she said:

Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.
Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…
Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

In “America Needs a Code for Babies”, 27 Mar 1934:

“Give dysgenic groups [people with "bad genes"] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization.”

Delightful woman that Margaret Sanger and a fine representation of what Gloria Steinem, Barack Obama, and Nancy Pelosi represent.

The fact that far more minorities than whites are having their babies aborted should concern everyone. It’s of genocidal proportions.

What is it with people like Nancy Pelosi and the uncompromising support of abortion and eugenics?

The infamous, Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood, was and is much adored by Progressives for her stand on abortion and eugenics.

Congratulations Nancy upon receiving this dubious award in the name of a eugenicist racist, KKK lover, you have earned it.

 

Nancy Pelosi thinks the Catholic Church doesn’t know when life begins:

http://www.independentsentinel.com/nancy-pelosi-to-accept-award-in-the-name-of-famed-eugenicist-margaret-sanger/
« Last Edit: March 24, 2014, 06:18:37 AM by rangerrebew »
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 23,503
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Quote
It’s their “highest recognition of leadership, excellence, and outstanding contributions to the reproductive health and rights movement.”

Since someone has to do it: Ms. Pelosi totally deserves this award. Think of how many evening bouts of carnality her face has prevented.
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
Since someone has to do it: Ms. Pelosi totally deserves this award. Think of how many evening bouts of carnality her face has prevented.

Actually, think about how many abortions this woman has personally enabled over the years.  She and her Democratic allies in the Congress are responsible for what amounts to genocide in the black community, where abortions outnumbered live births last year, at least in New York.  We don't have reliable statistics for other large black populations around the country, at least not were one can easily lay their hands on it; but if the truth be known, abortion is the black community's holocaust, and people like Pelosi are directly responsible for that.  Someday blacks will wake up to that fact but it won't be any time soon.

So yes, she does deserve this award, only not in the way she thinks she deserves it.

 :smokin:



Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 23,503
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Oh, she'll get her reward, alright. Confident of that.

I only hope she doesn't get the luck of the Irish: "May you have an hour in heaven, afore the devil finds out you are dead."
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf