Author Topic: The EPA is charging $75,000/day over a private citizen's pond, but don't you worry about their revisions to the Clean Water Act.  (Read 480 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,465
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
The EPA is charging $75,000/day over a private citizen’s pond, but don’t you worry about their revisions to the Clean Water Act


posted at 5:31 pm on March 15, 2014 by Erika Johnsen

 
Earlier this week, I mentioned an NYT article detailing the concerns of a large group of farmers, ranchers, manufacturers, builders, and etcetera over the Environmental Protection Agency’s recent undertaking to personally revise the parameters of the Clean Water Act. The Act was originally meant to give the EPA the authority to regulate waters connecting to the “navigable waterways” of the United States, but as the EPA has steadily and aggressively tried to expand their jurisdiction over the years, they have had to deal with far too many bothersome lawsuits challenging their authority. Ergo, they decided to rewrite the rules to more clearly define exactly what bodies of water are within their regulatory power — and a bunch of lawmakers, lobbies, businesses, and private citizens are worried that the end result is going to be yet another massive EPA power grab that will make big government an even more pervasive and retarding for in commercial activity and on private property.

The EPA, of course, is scornfully dismissing these concerns and would really like for everyone to just calm down. After all, these bureaucrats are just trying to do their munificent “green” jobs, and as one lawyer in the aforementioned NYT article impatiently noted of the draft regulations leaked late last year, “The draft guidance is clear that irrigation ditches, drainage ponds and even groundwater are not considered waters of the U.S. Nor are gullies, rills, swales and other erosional features. This has been explained over and over again.”

Yes, I simply can’t imagine why any of these concerned groups think they have a reason to worry. Via Fox News:


All Andy Johnson wanted to do was build a stock pond on his sprawling eight-acre Wyoming farm. He and his wife Katie spent hours constructing it, filling it with crystal-clear water, and bringing in brook and brown trout, ducks and geese. It was a place where his horses could drink and graze, and a private playground for his three children.

But instead of enjoying the fruits of his labor, the Wyoming welder says he was harangued by the federal government, stuck in what he calls a petty power play by the Environmental Protection Agency. He claims the agency is now threatening him with civil and criminal penalties – including the threat of a $75,000-a-day fine. …

The government says he violated the Clean Water Act by building a dam on a creek without a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers. Further, the EPA claims that material from his pond is being discharged into other waterways. Johnson says he built a stock pond — a man-made pond meant to attract wildlife — which is exempt from Clean Water Act regulations.

The property owner says he followed the state rules for a stock pond when he built it in 2012 and has an April 4-dated letter from the Wyoming State Engineer’s Office to prove it. …

But the EPA isn’t backing down and argues they have final say over the issue. They also say Johnson needs to restore the land or face the fines.

But those Clean Water Act revisions they say they have no intention of abusing? You should definitely just take their word for it.

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/03/15/the-epa-is-charging-75000day-over-a-private-citizens-pond-but-dont-you-worry-about-their-revisions-to-the-clean-water-act/
« Last Edit: March 16, 2014, 07:03:10 AM by rangerrebew »
There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics. There must be a positive passion for the public good, the public interest, honour, power and glory, established in the minds of the people, or there can be no republican government, nor any real liberty: and this public passion must be superior to all private passions. John Adams

Offline kevindavis

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,688
"Die-hard conservatives thought that if I couldn't get everything I asked for, I should jump off the cliff with the flag flying-go down in flames. No, if I can get 70 or 80 percent of what it is I'm trying to get ... I'll take that and then continue to try to get the rest in the future."

Ronald Reagan

"We must continue to go into space for humanity.” - Dr. Stephen Hawking

The US Constitution is a result of compromise and ideals... and I think it's pretty darn great.

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 19,856
  • Itchy yet?
Elections has consequences...

Yep. That Nixon guy should never have been voted in.
Anyone who tells you you can't buy happiness has never been in a book store or an animal shelter.

You are the result of 3 billion years of evolutionary success. Act like it.

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline kevindavis

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,688
Yep. That Nixon guy should never have been voted in.


I kinda do see the need for the EPA, however, under the Obama administration, they have gone overboard..
"Die-hard conservatives thought that if I couldn't get everything I asked for, I should jump off the cliff with the flag flying-go down in flames. No, if I can get 70 or 80 percent of what it is I'm trying to get ... I'll take that and then continue to try to get the rest in the future."

Ronald Reagan

"We must continue to go into space for humanity.” - Dr. Stephen Hawking

The US Constitution is a result of compromise and ideals... and I think it's pretty darn great.

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 19,856
  • Itchy yet?

I kinda do see the need for the EPA, however, under the Obama administration, they have gone overboard..

Totally the same. There is a need for them, but no one has ever bothered keeping them on a short leash.
Anyone who tells you you can't buy happiness has never been in a book store or an animal shelter.

You are the result of 3 billion years of evolutionary success. Act like it.

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,465
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Particularly under Obama where they have been emboldened. :chairbang:
There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics. There must be a positive passion for the public good, the public interest, honour, power and glory, established in the minds of the people, or there can be no republican government, nor any real liberty: and this public passion must be superior to all private passions. John Adams

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 43,485
  • #NeverTrumpForever
Yep. That Nixon guy should never have been voted in.

in retrospect, it probably wasn't the best choice.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,570
[[ But the EPA isn’t backing down and argues they have final say over the issue. ]]

How long before the EPA decides they are going to regulate UNDERground water, as well?

How long before they begin prosecuting rural homeowners and homebuilders for drilling "unauthorized" wells on their properties?

Go ahead, laugh now.

But I sense with many more cases such as the one above, the laughter will start dying down...

Offline katzenjammer

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,513
[[ But the EPA isn’t backing down and argues they have final say over the issue. ]]

How long before the EPA decides they are going to regulate UNDERground water, as well?

How long before they begin prosecuting rural homeowners and homebuilders for drilling "unauthorized" wells on their properties?

Go ahead, laugh now.

But I sense with many more cases such as the one above, the laughter will start dying down...

Ain't no laughing matter at all.  These monsters are going full tilt until they are stopped.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf