Author Topic: Dems' 2014 foil: Koch brothers  (Read 285 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
Dems' 2014 foil: Koch brothers
« on: March 14, 2014, 09:12:19 PM »

Dems' 2014 foil: Koch brothers

By BURGESS EVERETT | 3/14/14 6:22 PM EDT

Democrats want to make the billionaire Koch brothers their 2014 version of Mitt Romney.

Harry Reid and vulnerable Senate Democrats turned up the heat this week on the Kochs and their affiliated Americans for Prosperity, which has unleashed a flood of TV ads bashing vulnerable Democrats for supporting Obamacare. Democrats’ message: Charles and David Koch are trying buy the election for shady special interests and big business.

Democrats feel that simply defending Obamacare may not be enough to keep the Senate in Democratic hands come November. Instead, they need something to run against – and they’ve picked the Kochs as an easy foil.

The Senate majority leader went to the floor on Thursday — following a Democrat’s loss in a Florida special election in which Obamacare was a major issue — to call out the Koch’s “radical” agenda, using that word 17 times. Reid has put a permanent target on the Kochs’ backs on the Senate floor, just as he did with Romney in 2012.

Barely a day passes that the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee doesn’t mention the Kochs’ influence in its fundraising solicitations. And outside groups like Senate Majority PAC and Americans United For Change are questioning both the veracity of the ads and who is paying for them.

“The American people don’t want to have their elections bought by just a few people. I think it’s very important that people know who’s paying for these ads,” said DSCC Chairman Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.).

Bennet’s predecessor and current member of Democratic leadership, Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), said the anti-Koch message “is motivating not just to our base, but the country.”

But not everybody’s on board with the increasingly blunt Democratic messaging, particularly that of Reid, who has unapologetically described the Kochs as “un-American,” “radical,” and “shadowy billionaires.”

“That’s not my style, it’s not. They’re operating within the limits of the law,” said Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), who agreed that the Kochs’ influence was “obscene” but disagrees with some of his party’s hardball tactics. “I don’t think that we’re going to prove anything with the name-calling. I don’t think we get many results from that anyway. It hasn’t worked before.”

Blaming the messenger is a tried-and-true campaign strategy and success with voters is far from guaranteed.

“The Democrats have realized that they can’t win on their ideas. Instead, they’ve resorted to personal attacks on the Kochs. This is not a new tactic,” said Rob Tappan, a spokesman for Koch Industries. “It’s escalated because Senator Reid is running scared and worried about losing the Senate and his job as majority leader.”

So far, Democrats are focused on the “fix it, don’t repeal it” Affordable Care Act message pushed by party elders. But now they also want to convince voters that GOP candidates will repeal Obamacare’s popular provisions, curtail safety net programs and roll back environmental regulations, all by winning the Senate with the support of AFP’s millions.

A Republican-led Senate would actually be a “Koch Brothers Congress” that would reflect their “richest-take-all policy agenda,” Reid said Thursday. This week the Reid-affiliated Senate Majority PAC launched an advertisement in Louisiana alleging that Senate candidate and Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) would be “bought and paid for” by the billionaires if he beats Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.). Up for reelection this year, Sen. Mark Begich (D) unveiled a TV spot in his home state of Alaska devoted to telling the “Koch brothers go home.”

Begich sounds much like Reid when talking about the Kochs, accusing them in an interview of trying to “buy elections” and calling them “irresponsible” for the shutdown of an Alaska refinery under Koch Industries’ umbrella.

“What’s motivating that? They’re closing a plant and laying off 80 Alaskans and leaving dirty water that Alaskans have to deal with,” Begich said of his ad. “What’s motivating it? They’re irresponsible people.”

The Koch-bashing is a tactic that Democrats believe garners them rafts of free media exposure in an uphill battle against $30 million in AFP TV ads to date that Democrats say distort their record on health care and climate change.

Asked about the ads AFP is running in Alaska, Begich said: “What they’re saying is absolutely false. But they still run ‘em because that’s what they do. They don’t tell the truth, they just throw whatever’s out there and hope it sticks.”

It’s gotten so personal that Koch Industries produced on Thursday a two-minute rebuttal to Begich’s advertisement to counteract the senator’s “misleading and false statements.”

As the party steps up its assault on the Kochs and the flood of outside money floods into red and purple states, Senate Democrats remain wedded to the same Obamacare messaging used by defeated House candidate Alex Sink in Florida this week.

Incumbent Democrats want to keep the law but also press publicly to iron out its kinks, an approach they believe is supported by the public. But Senate Democrats also don’t have much room to maneuver given the law’s party-line passage, leaving Democrats stuck with a nuanced defense of Obamacare, whether they like it or not.

“They voted for Obamacare, they are proud of that vote, and I think that’s a very dangerous position to be in,” said National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), who warned little is “accomplished by trying to tinker with Obamacare.”

Democratic senators pressing for health-care fixes have gotten some support from the Obama administration’s myriad alterations to the law’s implementation, but little cover from Senate leaders that still have no plans for even a symbolic vote on changing Obamacare. That’s a sharp contrast to vulnerable House Democrats that have broken away from the party line to support GOP bills altering the law, a tactic those moderates hope can insulate them from health care attacks this fall.

Lacking health-care legislative fixes to point to, incumbent Democrats are staying the course: Keep it, fix it and don’t repeal it.

“It will remain the same as it always has been, that no law is perfect and every law needs to be improved,” Landrieu said of her message going forward.

“Let’s work on the parts that aren’t perfect. Let’s try to make them better, but let’s keep the things that are working. That position won’t change, ”said Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.).

Democrats say they learned their lesson in 2010, when a revolt against Democrats put them in the House minority, which is unlikely to change this fall. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) has organized a spirited defense of the health care law on the Senate floor and in press conferences.

He hasn’t been joined by the Democrats’ 2014 class, but he hears the same message from them, and it’s one he believes will neutralize GOP attacks by November.

“You can’t run away from the health care law,” Murphy said. “If you listen to the way in which our 2014 members talk about the health care bill, it’s demonstrably different than what it was in 2010.”

But Democrats also believe that Obamacare is not going to be the singular winning message for them — or Republicans for that matter, who Democrats surmise are overplaying their hand in insistently pounding Obamacare. Hence a string of coordinated attacks on the money that’s poured into Louisiana, Arkansas, North Carolina and Alaska and the conservative benefactors behind that cash spigot.

Indeed, Republicans believe that Democrats are falling for the same failed strategy used by the GOP in 2006.

“Republican operatives were making the same case that Democrats are now: ‘We know how to win,’” said NRSC spokesman Brad Dayspring. “Attacking liberal money sources like [George] Soros and was a common refrain for losing Republican candidates and politically speaking, Democrats’ inability to properly address or talk about ObamaCare is reminiscent of Republicans talking about Iraq.”

It’s also not clear that all Democrats in tough races this year will get behind demonizing the Kochs. Despite having $700,000 in ads dropped on him by AFP on Thursday, Pryor said he had no immediate plans to bash the wealthy brothers in his ads or rhetoric.

“I don’t know what I’m going to do on that,” Pryor said in an interview. “This race is going to be about Arkansas, not all this outside money. The outside groups total have now spent in excess of $5 million and the great news is my opponent’s numbers haven’t moved and we feel like we’re in great shape to win this thing.”

“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
Re: Dems' 2014 foil: Koch brothers
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2014, 09:30:53 PM »


Posted on March 14, 2014 by PatriotsBillboard   


Ed Morrissey 3-14-14  Harry Reid’s unhinged rants on the Senate floor about David and Charles Koch reflect not just one man’s paranoia but an empty strategy of demagoguery by a major political party. A new ad from the party’s Senate Majority PAC attempting to protect Mary Landrieu from the consequences of her support for Barack Obama’s agenda tried to shift attention in Louisiana to “out-of-state billionaires,” by which they did not mean George Soros or Tom Steyer. The ad claims that the Kochs support “tax cuts for companies that ship our jobs overseas,” but as the Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler deduces, practically nothing in that argument is true … including the that and the for:

Matsdorf cites the fact that ATR has a taxpayer pledge for candidates to “oppose any and all tax increases” and that ATR once ran a fact check blog post on an Obama speech that said that “companies don’t get tax breaks for moving anything overseas.” (One can argue over semantics, but Obama has a tendency to suggest this is a special loophole. Instead, it’s a standard moving expense deduction that is part of the tax code, whether you are moving jobs to Vienna, Va., or Vienna, Austria.)

But we could find no evidence that ATR ever took a position on this bill, which after all is supposedly the reason why Senate Majority PAC says that saving this “tax cut” is a central part of the Koch agenda. Indeed, Ryan Ellis, ATR’s policy director, told The Fact Checker: “I’ve never heard of that bill, so I can tell you with some confidence that we don’t have a position on it.”

Americans for Tax Reform did get a contribution from the Kochs’ organization, but it amounted to 1% of their contributions for the year — so this isn’t a Koch operation anyway. The Post’s own analysis of the reach of the Koch brothers called it an “outside ally,” not part of their operation, but SMP used it as the basis of their attack ad.

Needless to say, Kessler was unimpressed, giving Senate Majority PAC four pinocchios:

Upon examination, this claim crumbles into dust. The ad not only mischaracterizes an ordinary tax deduction as a special “tax cut” but then it falsely asserts that “protecting” this tax break is part of the Koch agenda. It turns out this claim is based on a tenuous link to an organization that never even took a position on the legislation in question.

Equally unimpressed is National Journal’s Alex Roarty, who wonders what Democrats think they’re accomplishing by stoking their own Koch habit:

A Quinnipiac University poll in January ranked, in order, the three issues voters cared about the most: the economy, the federal budget deficit, and health care. Not included on the list? Charles and David Koch.

And therein lies the dilemma for Democrats, who of late have turned the full fury and might of their political operation against the billionaire brothers from Kansas. …

Voters don’t like the outside interference, but their distaste doesn’t necessarily have the resonance to push voters away from the GOP. And even for all of the influence wielded by Americans for Prosperity and other Koch-affiliated enterprises, they’re still just outside groups in an election in which voters are still just choosing between Republicans and Democrats.

“There’s a trap in campaigns that’s called the Other People’s Money trap,” said Brad Todd, a Republican strategist. “Voters care about their money, not other people’s money. Anytime my candidate is talking about the voters’ money and my opponent is talking about other people’s money, I feel pretty good about our chances.”

It gets trickier for Democrats in individual races. Along with Begich, Sens. Mark Pryor in Arkansas and Mary Landrieu in Louisiana each accepted money from the Koch Industries PAC in recent years. Blasting them now—all three are battleground races this year—risks making the incumbent look like a hypocrite.

That’s especially true when they’re hijacking the Senate on behalf of Thomas Steyer for an issue that is among the lowest priorities for Americans in this election cycle — or missing from the priority list altogether. When asked to rank their top priority, unemployment and jobs topped yesterday’s Gallup poll list, while environmental issues and global warming didn’t even make the list. Income inequality, by the way, polled 2% at the bottom.

They’re flailing, and the reek of desperation is only getting more obvious.

Addendum: Not everyone at the Post has the time to check facts:   

“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo