Author Topic: Interview: How college administrators murdered free speech  (Read 225 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 48,673
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Interview: How college administrators murdered free speech
« on: March 14, 2014, 06:28:01 AM »
‘Unlearning Liberty’ author inverview: How college administrators murdered free speech

Posted By Robby Soave On 2:31 AM 03/14/2014 In | No Comments

Perhaps nowhere are First Amendment values more imperiled than at the modern American college campus — the very place where free speech should be most dearly cherished and vigorously upheld.

So argues Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and author of “Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of American Debate,” which was released in paperback this week.

In an exclusive interview with The Daily Caller, Lukianoff spelled out precisely what’s wrong with universities, from the Ivy League to community college — they routinely punish students for even the most harmless and inoffensive speech.

“It’s becoming quite easy to get in trouble for just questioning the administration, depending upon who your university president or administrators are,” Lukianoff told The DC.

Many people have the wrong impression about the state of discourse in academia, falsely believing that Supreme Court decisions settled the matter decades ago. While it is true that courts have consistently upheld college students’ First Amendment rights, the rulings have not stopped enthusiastic censors at both private and public universities from criminalizing free speech, said Lukianoff.

Sadly, society isn’t paying enough attention. When Lukianoff tells people of the plight of the modern college campus, he often hears the opinion that the censorship is acceptable because it’s well-intentioned — an idea that “just scares me to death,” he said.

“A previous generation, if you told them you were going to get in trouble for your opinion on college campuses, the generation of the 60s and the 70s, it was completely outrageous to them,” he said. “You didn’t have to explain why it was a big deal. Now when I go to campuses I hear a lot more from students saying, ‘Well it’s well-intentioned… it’s not that big of a deal.’”

The assertion that censorship is usually well-intentioned is simply false, said Lukianoff. FIRE has covered numerous cases where vindictive administrators cracked down on students specifically because they were publicizing harsh truths or uncomfortable details about the university.

Administrative bloat is partly to blame. Though faculty salaries and employment levels have remained largely steady–or even fallen–the ranks of the bureaucratic class has grown exponentially at universities. A report by the American Institutes for Research found that “on most college campuses, the majority of workers are not teaching students.”

What are all these low and mid-level administrators doing instead? Many of them are censoring students.

“They simply don’t like being criticized; they simply don’t like being disagreed with,” said Lukianoff. “So the huge expansion of the administrative class at universities is one of the reasons things have gotten so bad for free speech on college campuses.”

An illustrative case is the one from Modesto Junior College, where an administrator and campus security officer barred a student from handing out copies of the Constitution on Constitution days — violating the explicit free speech precepts found in America’s governing document. (RELATED: Campus cop stops student from handing out Constitutions … ON CONSTITUTION DAY)

Unfortunately, students are learning from the administrators, and increasingly respond to differing opinions in a manner befitting the thought-police.

“Speech codes, all of these attempts to shut down opinions with which we disagree, all of these tactics that administrators us, are teaching students all the wrong lessons about what it means to live in a free society,” he said. “It teaches students to think like censors.”

What happened at Brown University last year is a good example. A mob of far-left students heckled New York Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, the controversial proponent of stop-and-frisk, until he gave up on his attempted guest lecture.

The leaders of the mob protest proudly proclaimed that they were merely exercising their free speech rights, even though their actions were anathema to the First Amendment. (RELATED: Liberal mob shouts down speaker at Brown U, calls it ‘free speech’ [VIDEO])

Unlearning Liberty provides countless other examples of students, administrators –and sometimes, even faculty members — violating the essential free speech principles that made American universities vital and relevant in the first place.

Perhaps the most shocking case uncovered by FIRE was a program of total indoctrination within the dormitories of the University of Delaware. Some 7,000 students lived in the residence halls, where they were continuously besieged by residence advisors whose explicit goals were to re-educate them about social and political matters. Students were forced to repent their views and adopt liberal positions on abortion, racism, gay marriage and other controversial issues. Otherwise, they were disciplined.

The program, deemed “Orwellian” by FIRE, was marketed as a “treatment for students’ incorrect attitudes and beliefs.”

“They thought it was the university’s business to figure what races and sexes students would date and quiz them and more or less make them more open to dating people of different races and different sexes,” said Lukianoff. “When one student actually answered ‘none of your damn business’ to this invasive questionnaire, which is an entirely appropriate response from a citizen in a free society, they actually wrote her up for being rude to an RA.”

The program at Delaware was shut down, thanks to FIRE’s intervention. Unfortunately, nearly 60 percent of American colleges maintain unconstitutional speech codes that censor students in one way or another. (RELATED: Annual report shows most colleges remain anti-free speech hellholes)

A society where college campuses are some of the least free places to speak will not remain a free society for long, warns Unlearning Liberty.

“I am shocked on a daily basis by the kind of violations of free speech you see on college campuses,” said Lukianoff.

Follow Robby on Twitter


Article printed from The Daily Caller:

URL to article:

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves. Abraham Lincoln

Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,648
  • Silence is Golden. Boredom is even better.
Re: Interview: How college administrators murdered free speech
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2014, 06:50:32 AM »
Been happening for at least 40 years. The worst offenders are not even the Administration. You get some leftist professor, who wrote the book required for his class, and if you dare question even mildly, you fail.
Then there are the empty vessels. At college doing some waste of space course because it is expected of them and they spend their time hassling people trying to study, burnishing their "compassionate" credentials at the expense of the people who wish to learn.

They are rather unwise taking on Engineering students though. The majority of those have a very low tolerance for PC BS.
Before you bitch about the youth of today ... think about who raised them.

Avatar thanks to Oceander.

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Online mountaineer

  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,947
Re: Interview: How college administrators murdered free speech
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2014, 08:55:22 AM »
Brings to mind this kerfluffle at Valdosta State University where a kid was kicked out for criticizing the administration's plan to build a parking garage.
“Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote that he is not making a present or a compliment to please an individual – or at least that he ought not so to do; but rather he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country.” Samuel Adams, April 16, 1781.

Offline Gazoo

  • Inactive Members
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,968
Re: Interview: How college administrators murdered free speech
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2014, 09:37:47 AM »
like a slow boiling frog in a pot.
"The Tea Party has a right to feel cheated.

When does the Republican Party, put in the majority by the Tea Party, plan to honor its commitment to halt the growth of the Federal monolith and bring the budget back into balance"?

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo