Author Topic: Obama NSA nominee defends mass tyranny and spying on Americans  (Read 125 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65,566
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
VIDEO Obama NSA Nominee Defends Mass Tyranny and Spying On Americans

Posted on March 12, 2014   by ror1774    

“I believe that we need to maintain an ability to make queries of phone records”
March 11, 2014 by Steve Watson

The president’s “reforms” of the NSA continue apace, as his pick to become the new head of the agency today defended mass spying on Americans, saying it is necessary to prevent terrorist attacks.

Responding to questions from Senators, Vice Admiral Michael Rogers stated that it is imperative that the NSA have access to vast amounts of metadata, in order that the government can keep Americans safe.

Rogers argued that section 215 of the Patriot Act should remain intact and the spooks should not be hindered from using it to justify mass surveillance.

“The telephone metadata program under Section 215 was designed to map the communications of terrorists so we can see who they may be in contact with as quickly as possible,” Rogers said.

Sen. Ted Cruz Q&A with Vice Admiral Michael S. Rogers on NSA Surveillance

While making insignificant noises about “welcoming a dialogue” on “transparency”, a now empty promise that Americans have heard ad infinitum from the administration, Rogers essentially defended the NSA’s programs and said the status quo should be maintained.

“I believe that we need to maintain an ability to make queries of phone records in a way that is agile and provides results in a timely fashion. Being able to quickly review phone connections associated with terrorists to assess whether a network exists is critical.” he stated.

Rogers added that the most difficult task he faces is to convince Americans the government has their best interests at heart.

“how do we engage the American people, and by extension, their representatives, in a dialogue in which they have a level of comfort as to what we are doing and why.” Rogers said.

He also claimed that it would be possible to effectively outsource the surveillance program to have telcoms maintain the database of communications data, as suggested by Obama as part of the “reform” process.

“I believe, sir, with the right construct, we can make that work,” Rogers said in response to a question from Senator Carl Levin, the chairman of the Senate panel.

Senators Mark Udall and Ted Cruz pressed Rogers during the hearing, pushing for an assurance that he would seek to end bulk phone records collection. Of course, it was not forthcoming:

Udall Presses NSA Nominee on Ending Bulk Phone Record Collection, Protecting Americans’ Privacy

Critics have jumped on Rogers’ nomination for NSA head, charging that he represents continuity for the NSA rather than any meaningful change.

“Right now, we don’t know a lot about Mike Rogers, but the little we do know suggests he is not a reform candidate at all, but more of the same,” said Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation.

“It’s a shame President Obama didn’t use this opportunity to appoint an NSA chief that can better calibrate Americans’ growing privacy concerns against the NSA’s current goal to ‘collect it all.’”

Back in January, Obama promised to rein in the NSA, while at the same time going out of his way to justify its actions by ludicrously comparing the agency to Paul Revere.

To virtually no one’s surprise, the president’s “reforms” are not designed to stop NSA’s mass spying, and this was immediately evident in the opening remarks of the January speech when he attempted to argue that in times of war, the US has always used surveillance to secure freedom.

The president has recruited a gaggle of his own insiders to probe the NSA, including John Podesta, head of the White House front group The Center for American Progress, and Cass Sunstein, the former White House information czar.

Meanwhile the House and Senate Intelligence committees, which are supposed to operate as oversight watchdogs of government spy agencies, have, in the words of Rep. James Sensenbrenner Jr., the man who authored the original PATRIOT Act of 2001, become “cheerleaders” for the NSA.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2014, 06:47:20 AM by rangerrebew »
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo