Author Topic: UN Ambassador Power says Russia intervention 'must stop,' Moscow defiant  (Read 229 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 246,389
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/03/03/obama-threatens-to-isolate-russia-on-ukraine-though-few-back-military-option/

UN Ambassador Power says Russia intervention 'must stop,' Moscow defiant
Published March 03, 2014FoxNews.com

America's U.N. ambassador blasted Russia on Monday for its "dangerous military intervention" in Ukraine, calling it a violation of international law and saying: "It must stop."

"There is nothing that justifies Russian conduct," Ambassador Samantha Power said, speaking at a U.N. Security Council meeting just minutes after her Russian counterpart delivered defiant remarks.

Russian Ambassador to the U.N. Vitaly Churkin defended the use of Russia's military in Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula, claiming the "legitimately elected authorities" in that region asked Russia to intervene and saying this was "completely legitimate under Russian law."

He also claimed Ukraine's ousted president wrote a letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin asking for him to use the military in Ukraine.

Power retorted that Russian officials' statements are "without basis in reality" and "self-serving."

The sharp exchange came as western leaders, at the U.N. and elsewhere, scramble to convince Vladimir Putin to stand down.

Shortly beforehand, President Obama also said Russia is "on the wrong side of history" and warned that the U.S. and its allies are examining steps to "isolate" the country. Obama, before a meeting in Washington with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, said the world largely is in agreement that Russia is "in violation of international law."

He said Moscow's actions are deeply troubling, and said this would be a "costly proposition" for Russia if it continues down this path.

"We are examining a whole series of steps -- economic, diplomatic -- that will isolate Russia," Obama said.

What specific steps the U.S. and Europe would take to dissuade Putin, though, is an open question, as the cold warrior toys with whether to advance Russian troops beyond the Crimean Peninsula. Despite western countries discussing a range of punishments for Moscow, hardly anybody is pushing military action.

The closest any top-ranking official got was Secretary of State John Kerry saying Sunday that "all options are on the table." In a separate interview the same morning, though, Kerry stressed that a military response is "the last thing anybody wants."

It's a far cry from the 2011 Libya uprising against Muammar Qaddafi, when Washington and western European capitals were gripped by robust debate over whether to use force to prop up the rebels.

This time, even the hawkish lawmakers on the Hill are saying it's best to stand down.

"There is not a lot of options on the table. And candidly -- and I'm a fairly hawkish guy -- sending more naval forces to operate in the Black Sea is not a good idea," House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Mich., told "Fox News Sunday."

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called over the weekend for a range of options "without the use of military force."

And on NBC's "Meet the Press," Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said: "If you're asking me whether the U.S. should be taking military strikes against Russian troops in Ukraine or in Crimea, I would argue to you that I don't think anyone is advocating for that."

So what options are there?

To hear Obama administration officials tell it, they're banking on the assumption that diplomatic and economic pressure can convince Putin to ease off.

On Monday, a diplomat reportedly said the European Union has agreed to consider "targeted measures" against Russia if Moscow does not dial back tensions, though it's unclear what those measures might be.

On the U.S. side, Washington could expand asset freezes and visa bans and other sanctions on powerful Russians. There's also the possibility of imposing trade and investment penalties.

Kerry, who is leaving later Monday for Ukraine, said he has consulted other world leaders and all are committed to doing what is necessary to isolate Russia diplomatically. President Obama spoke Sunday with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, British Prime Minister David Cameron and Polish President Bronislaw Komorowski.

In Brussels, NATO's secretary-general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, said Russia's actions have violated a U.N. charter. He said the alliance was re-evaluating its relationship with Russia.

But the most immediate penalties appear to revolve around Russia's membership in the G-8. All seven other members of that elite group have announced they are suspending preparation work for an upcoming summit in Russia. Kerry and Capitol Hill lawmakers say Russia also risks being kicked out of the group altogether.

Separately, the White House said Monday that the U.S. has decided not to send a presidential delegation to the Paralympic Games in Sochi, Russia. Britain has also decided not to send ministers to the Paralympic Games, which start Friday.

Several U.S. senators also called for bolstered missile defense systems based in Poland and the Czech Republic. Rubio and fellow GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said the Obama administration should return to plans it abandoned in 2009 to place long-range missile interceptors and radar in Poland and the Czech Republic.

But a few lone voices say economic pressure may not be enough. Notably, retired Adm. James Stavridis, NATO's former Supreme Allied Commander of Europe, said in a Foreign Policy column on Saturday that military options -- and others -- should be discussed.

He urged NATO to develop contingency plans to react to a "full-scale invasion of Ukraine," noting that NATO planners moved quickly in Libya.
He suggested bringing NATO's 25,000-member Response Force to a "higher state of alert" and sailing maritime forces into the Black Sea.

Obama administration officials have pushed back on the possibility of a military confrontation.

"I don't think we're focused right now on the notion of some U.S. military intervention," one official said.

But some fret that the United States is rapidly losing influence on the world stage, absent any severe consequences.

"Everybody says 'no' to the U.S. these days without cost or consequence," Aaron David Miller, former adviser to six secretaries of State and scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, told Fox News.

He said the last "truly effective" foreign policy was under former President George H.W. Bush. "There was a cost for saying 'no' to the United States," he reminisced. "Right now, there is no cost."

Support the USO

Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,559
This is interesting isn't it? Usually everything Obama does is wrong  BUT now he is upset with this?  What is up? I can only guess that the administration is taking a hit for him being weak and he has to be on the side of Ukraine.What do others here on the forum think? He could just be doing all of this for LIV's consumption, make him look strong on the nighttime news broadcast?


Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
Quote
But the most immediate penalties appear to revolve around Russia's membership in the G-8. All seven other members of that elite group have announced they are suspending preparation work for an upcoming summit in Russia. Kerry and Capitol Hill lawmakers say Russia also risks being kicked out of the group altogether.

But Cruz is bad to suggest this very thing.........

Quote
Several U.S. senators also called for bolstered missile defense systems based in Poland and the Czech Republic. Rubio and fellow GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said the Obama administration should return to plans it abandoned in 2009 to place long-range missile interceptors and radar in Poland and the Czech Republic.


But it is suggested CRUZ would drag us into this very thing and another war -- okay if Rubio suggests both things above, however....... /s
“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 16,540
I've been a little out of the loop .... where does the EU stand on this?  What are they suggesting/willing to do?

This, after all, really is there front yard.
"January 20th 2017 will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again."  --  President Donald J. Trump

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
I've been a little out of the loop .... where does the EU stand on this?  What are they suggesting/willing to do?

This, after all, really is there front yard.

They are joining the USA in not going to the G-8 in Russia which was coming up.

The problem Europe is in ... they are dependent on energy from Russia.. oil and gas.......   also because of their greenies.
“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
Did she stamp her widdle footie and make mean faces too??

This means nothing, and the cumulative Obama record of the past five years is why Putin is making his move with no regard to what the Americans think. 

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 16,540
They are joining the USA in not going to the G-8 in Russia which was coming up.

The problem Europe is in ... they are dependent on energy from Russia.. oil and gas.......   also because of their greenies.

True.  But Russia is also dependent upon their money.
"January 20th 2017 will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again."  --  President Donald J. Trump

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 16,540
Did she stamp her widdle footie and make mean faces too??

It pains me to admit this but she was poised and articulate. 
"January 20th 2017 will be remembered as the day the people became the rulers of this nation again."  --  President Donald J. Trump


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf