Author Topic: U.S. assessment of Crimea: This isn’t an invasion, it’s an … “uncontested arrival”  (Read 276 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 248,442
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/02/28/u-s-assessment-of-crimea-this-isnt-an-invasion-its-an-uncontested-arrival/

U.S. assessment of Crimea: This isn’t an invasion, it’s an … “uncontested arrival”
posted at 5:58 pm on February 28, 2014 by Allahpundit

My mistake. I thought the White House might try to make all of this go away by accepting Putin’s phony pretense that it’s a domestic uprising among ethnic Russians in Crimea, not an invasion by Russia. In fact, says the White House, there is a foreign element to the new troop presence — but it’s all good so far because Crimea isn’t resisting.

In other words, to save face over the fact that there’s nothing much we can do to stop this, the official U.S. line is that this can’t be an invasion if the Russians are being … greeted as liberators.

Quote
    CNN JUST IN — U.S. assessment is the arrival of Russian military forces was uncontested by population of Crimea -@BarbaraStarrCNN

    — Vaughn Sterling (@vplus) February 28, 2014



    Admin officials tell CNN's Barbara Starr this is an "uncontested arrival" not necessarily "an invasion" and that this distinction is "key."

    — Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) February 28, 2014


Popehat’s right: “Uncontested arrival” is the best Orwellian euphemism for war since “kinetic military action.” Laying aside the fact that we’re now lending rhetorical support to aggressive irredentism (the Tatars in Crimea are going to “contest” this “arrival,” I’m pretty sure), explain to me why he went out there an hour ago and blathered about his “deep concern” for violations of Ukraine’s sovereignty if we’re adopting the position that maybe Ukraine’s not the rightful sovereign in Crimea after all. I took his statement to be a condemnation of Russian action today, but maybe I have it wrong. Maybe all he meant was that a broader invasion of Ukraine would threaten the country’s sovereignty — although your guess is as good as mine as to how broad it’d have to be to trigger U.S. disapproval. A Russian incursion into the rest of eastern Ukraine might also go uncontested. At this point, if you’re Putin, hearing this reaction from the White House (and crickets from the EU, do note), why not give it a go?

By the way, while Moscow’s digesting the green light it just got from the U.S. to consolidate its gains, Obama’s at DNC headquarters kicking off happy hour for Democrats. I’m not kidding.


Support the USO

Offline Lipstick on a Hillary

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,027
The Rethuglicans have blocked the funding needed to discover which Youtube video set the Russians off.

Offline PzLdr

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,421
I don't know whether to laugh or cry. Still, you can't expect a bozo who wouldn't go to the defense of his Ambassador to Libya and three other Americans to contemplate going to the rescue of a non-Muslim country.  :shrug:
Hillary's Self-announced Qualifications: She Stood Up To Putin...She Sits to Pee

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
The Rethuglicans have blocked the funding needed to discover which Youtube video set the Russians off.

 :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly:
“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf