Author Topic: Check Out the Fundamental Transformation of the USA Through the UDHR  (Read 127 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline happyg

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,822
By Sara Noble

The U.N.’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is being taught in New York schools and it is being held up as the standard.

The assignment included below is from Engage NY and was given out in a Long Island district this week The parent of the student who received this assignment can’t remember her child learning about the U.S. Bill of Rights.

New York is steeped in Common Core, which can easily become a vehicle to indoctrinate every school child in the United States in what is the global ethical religion of human rights. The UDHR is the long-sought ideal of liberal progressives.

The U.N. is a socialist body and they are not our friends. They want our wealth and our resources and the best way to do it is to bring us into their global village.

Jim Kelly of the Solidarity Center for Law and Justice said: “Since the 1948 adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations has developed a common core of international human rights principles, policies, and practices that constitutes a global ethical religion. Through the Common Core State Standards Initiative (“CCSSI”), with the co-operation of state governors, President Barack Obama and the U.S. Department of Education, the UN human rights common core is being used to indoctrinate impressionable k-12 students and fundamentally transform America.”

The UDHR cannot co-exist with our Bill of Rights. Our Bill of Rights protects individual rights while the UDHR mandates all rights as collectively held with individual rights ceding to the common good.

The end result of the numerous rights in the UDHR must be redistribution of all property and goods with government in control because there is no other way to meet the goals.

Examples from the Freeman:
Article 22 declares that “Everyone . . . has the right to social security.” The only way that “everyone” can have such a right is for government to force workers to pay for non-workers’ welfare and retirement funds. So the declared “right” of “everyone” to social security requires that national governments institute schemes of plunder or redistribution.

The Universal Declaration always defaults to government power.

More of article at link:

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 41,217
  • SMOD 2016
Re: Check Out the Fundamental Transformation of the USA Through the UDHR
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2014, 12:40:17 PM »
I wish people would be a little more careful when they start throwing accusations around.  The original article contains a photo of the assignment:

Some things to point out:

1) this is an 8th grade assignment; 13 year olds are certainly still impressionable, but they aren't exactly clueless, either;

2) without any further context there is no way to support the conclusion that the UDHR is being upheld as a standard (which still begs the question, of course; "a standard for what");

3) NY is not "steeped" in the Common Core; NY schools and students are having a really hard time right now precisely because the Common Core has never been taught in NY before and the state, for many stupid reasons, has decided to fully implement Common Core standards in one fell swoop, without any time for teachers or students to become accustomed to the new standards;

4) any set of educational standards brings with it the risks of being used as a tool for indoctrination; but just like gun control, what matters is the intent of the person using the standards - the tools - not the mere existence of the tool itself;

5) the assignment has nothing to do with, and makes no reference to, Article 22, which gets the author's undies in such a bunch; in fact, whether Malala Yousafzai has been denied social security by Pakistan has utterly no bearing on whether her shooting by the Taliban was unjust under the UDHR, so I rather highly doubt if any but the most dunderheaded of students will refer to Art. 22 in completing the assignment; and

6) the assignment was made within the context of learning about the Holocaust, as to which the assignment states "a dark time in history in which many Jews were systematically killed," and is intended to "look a bit further into modern examples of injustice in society;" several subpoints:

(a) the context has to do with learning about the Holocaust, and about other foreign (i.e., non-US) injustices, to which the US Bill of Rights is not particularly germane,

(b) the assignment, and the underlying reading, appears to be truthful about what happened in the Holocaust,

(c) the assignment in fact focuses the students on the injustice committed by the Taliban - radical muslim extremists - when they attempted to assassinate a young girl - someone with whom the students could more easily identify than, say, Anne Frank - because of her outspokenness; I should think that some would applaud this focus inasmuch as it echoes the constant criticisms from conservatives about the systematic abuses committed by muslim extremists, and

(d) as I mentioned above, the students are much more likely to empathize with Malala and, therefore, to take a much harder view of the Taliban and their acts, than they might otherwise have taken, so I should think this assignment would be at least partially applauded, not lambasted the way it's being treated.

I won't vote for Clinton, but I cannot vote for Trump.  How could I explain to my daughter why I supported a man who sees her as nothing more than a piece of meat, a piece of a$$ for him to grope for his own private pleasure.

"Trump supporter" - the very definition of an SFI

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo