Author Topic: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging  (Read 1081 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 257,485
Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« on: February 26, 2014, 08:58:14 AM »

Support the USO

Offline Relic

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,967
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2014, 09:03:32 AM »
It's incredibly stupid, but it works. What is wrong with women?

Offline Gazoo

  • Inactive Members
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,968
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2014, 09:07:49 AM »
And only the so called radical tea party candidates call it what it is. Dems are more at war with women and Obama's own WH pays women less.
"The Tea Party has a right to feel cheated.

When does the Republican Party, put in the majority by the Tea Party, plan to honor its commitment to halt the growth of the Federal monolith and bring the budget back into balance"?

Offline MBB1984

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 853
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2014, 01:54:43 PM »
It's incredibly stupid, but it works. What is wrong with women?

There are millions of stupid women out there.  Millions of stupid men, too.

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 19,428
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
    • The place where argument addicts can go
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2014, 02:04:49 PM »
Got "legitimate rape?"
"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln

Offline Millee

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,671
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2014, 02:12:53 PM »
There are millions of stupid women out there.  Millions of stupid men, too.

I'm ashamed of my gender every election cycle. 

Offline Lipstick on a Hillary

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,027
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2014, 02:22:12 PM »
Me too.  "Embarrassed by" is probably more like it in my case.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,376
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2014, 11:09:33 PM »
Relic wrote:
[[ It's incredibly stupid, but it works. What is wrong with women? ]]

Too many of them seem to be incredibly stupid.

(running for cover...)

Offline Once-Ler

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,684
  • How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Trump
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2014, 02:04:33 AM »
And only the so called radical tea party candidates call it what it is. Dems are more at war with women and Obama's own WH pays women less.
Do you believe the GOPe hasn't called the rats on their phoney war on woman?  It is my opinion that some people associated with the Tea Party have given credence to the rats fake war.  Rush calling a woman a slut, while logically correct has hurt the GOP and "legitimate rape" are two words we should never say again in front of a microphone.
"Racism is evil. And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans."  -  President Donald J Trump

Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!.....
...They have been in our country for many years through no fault of their own - brought in by parents at young age. Plus BIG border security
       Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump 5:35 AM - Sep 14, 2017

Offline Lipstick on a Hillary

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,027
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2014, 09:03:04 AM »
Me too.  "Embarrassed by" is probably more like it in my case.

For example..

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd8hJVj2g_0&amp;feature=player_embedded" target="_blank" class="aeva_link bbc_link new_win">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd8hJVj2g_0&amp;feature=player_embedded</a>

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 47,422
  • Chief Dork
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2014, 09:05:16 AM »
For example..

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd8hJVj2g_0&amp;feature=player_embedded" target="_blank" class="aeva_link bbc_link new_win">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd8hJVj2g_0&amp;feature=player_embedded</a>


How embarrassing.  I couldn't even finish watching that.

Online aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 19,713
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2014, 09:16:38 AM »
If it wasn't for the "ism" card, democrats would have no cards at all.
NeverTrump wants to deny you YOUR voice, YOUR presidential choice.

Online jmyrlefuller

  • Krampus
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,302
  • Angry goat-like creature
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2014, 09:22:33 AM »
Do you believe the GOPe hasn't called the rats on their phoney war on woman?  It is my opinion that some people associated with the Tea Party have given credence to the rats fake war.  Rush calling a woman a slut, while logically correct has hurt the GOP and "legitimate rape" are two words we should never say again in front of a microphone.
Which is why the GOP has to be very careful as to who they are choosing in the primaries. Note that all of these attacks came AFTER the primary elections, when it was too late to change it. Todd Akin, for instance, no more than a week after the primary he barely won, uttered his "body has ways of shutting that down" (the far more offensive and blatantly wrong, but less quote-friendly, of that comment) remarks and stubbornly stayed in the race despite no one wanting him to (except Newt and good ol' Huckabee). Of course, those hundreds of thousands of Democrat donations that funneled into Akin's account had NOTHING to do with it whatsoever... and of course, without Akin's mouth, Mourdock would have won Indiana, too. That's two seats lost. For Harry Reid and company, that's money well spent.

My suggestion? Let's get it out now. Let's pose these questions in our own primaries to weed out the people who would cause major problems in a general.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2014, 09:23:12 AM by jmyrlefuller »

Online aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 19,713
Re: Democrats resurrect War on Women messaging
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2014, 09:30:21 AM »

My suggestion? Let's get it out now. Let's pose these questions in our own primaries to weed out the people who would cause major problems in a general.


Good thought, I like it. Now, how do we keep it from turning into a witch hunt where the media gleefully airs our dirty laundry for us? We are dealing with politics. After all, politics is a high-stakes game of chess. Every move we make, the media/democrats counter.
NeverTrump wants to deny you YOUR voice, YOUR presidential choice.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf