Author Topic: White House back to 'saving jobs'  (Read 211 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 69,335
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
White House back to 'saving jobs'
« on: February 20, 2014, 09:05:17 AM »

WH back to ‘saving’ jobs
By Howard Portnoy on February 18, 2014 at 10:26 am 

Remember that meaningless stat from the early days of the Obama presidency? It meant nothing back then — there’s no way of quantifying the number of Americans who weren’t fired — and it means nothing now.

That hasn’t prevented Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers Jason Furman from boasting yesterday on the White House blog:

The [American] Recovery [and Reinvestment] Act [of 2009] by itself, saved or created about 6 million job-years, where a job-year is defined as one full-time job for one year. This translates to an average of 1.6 million jobs a year for four years through the end of 2012. This estimate is within the range of estimates provided by the Congressional Budget Office and other outside organizations. [Emphasis added]

Yesterday marked the fifth anniversary of the signing of that law, better known as Obama’s economic “stimulus.” And what better way to celebrate the return of a term bereft of meaning than to coin a new one: “job-year.”

Orwellianisms aside, Furman’s account conveniently omits some inconvenient truths concerning the stimulus, among them that unemployment has remained stubbornly high. If we’re going to stroll down Memory Lane, perhaps Furman could try to explain Obama’s upside-down threat that the unemployment rate would rise above 8% unless the nearly trillion-dollar stimulus were passed into law. In fact, upon the signing of the law, the rate promptly rose above that cap and remained above it by as much as full percentage point through September 2011.

Constitutions are not designed for metaphysical or logical subtleties, for niceties of expression, for critical propriety, for elaborate shades of meaning, or for the exercise of philosophical acuteness or judicial research. They are instruments of a practical nature, founded on the common business of human life, adapted to common wants, designed for common use, and fitted for common understandings.

Joseph Story

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo