Author Topic: Some People Are Going to Be Upset About It’: House Committee Concludes No ‘Stand Down’ Order Given in Benghazi  (Read 336 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719

Some People Are Going to Be Upset About It’: House Committee Concludes No ‘Stand Down’ Order Given in Benghazi
Feb. 10, 2014 11:30pm Madeleine Morgenstern   

A House committee formally concluded for the first time that there was no military “stand down” order given on the night of the deadly terror attacks in Benghazi, Libya.

It’s a finding that one committee aide acknowledged to TheBlaze, “some people are going to be upset about.” The allegation that the military was told to stand down on aiding the Americans in Benghazi has long been used to accuse the Obama administration of not doing enough to save the lives of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and others during the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks.

The Republican-led House Armed Services Committee, however, concluded in its new report that no such order was given; rather, Army Lt. Col. S.E. Gibson, then-head of the site security team at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, was ordered by higher commanders to remain in Tripoli, lest another attack take place there as part of a larger coordinated assault.

“The term ‘stand down’ means different things to different people. To someone in uniform, it means you are to do nothing … that is not the direction that Lt. Col. Gibson was given,” the committee aide told TheBlaze.

The finding is part of the committee’s Benghazi report set to be released Tuesday. Stevens, information technology specialist Sean Smith, and CIA security contractors and former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed.

“They didn’t know where the next attack was coming from,” the aide said. “They were given alternate orders to stay in Tripoli.”

Testifying before the House Oversight Committee in May, Gregory Hicks, Stevens’ former deputy chief of mission in Libya, did not object to Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz’s use of the words “stand down” in describing orders during the assault.

“I will quote Lt. Col. Gibson, he said, ‘this is the first time in my career that a diplomat has more balls than somebody in the military,’” Hicks testified in May.

But Gibson himself told members of the House Armed Services Committee in a briefing the following month that his four-person team was given no order to stand down, an assertion also made in congressional testimony by Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

“I was not ordered to stand down. I was ordered to remain in place. ‘Stand down’ implies that we cease all operations, cease all activities. We continued to support the team that was in Tripoli. We continued to maintain visibility of the events as they unfolded. … If we would have went into Benghazi, it could have been catastrophic,” Gibson said in June.

One member of Gibson’s team, a medic, is credited with providing critical care to Benghazi survivors who arrived in Tripoli.

“The Special Forces medic was instrumental in providing the support to the wounded that returned. We would not have been in Tripoli in order to provide that support if we would have got on the plane [to Benghazi]. The decision by my higher headquarters to not get on that plane was the correct decision, in hindsight,” Gibson said.

Obama administration critics have repeatedly used the “stand down” order in suggesting that the White House and State Department have engaged in a cover-up over Benghazi.

“I think some people are going to be upset about it,” the committee aide said of the report’s finding. “There is plenty to criticize the administration for … [but] the criticism that there is a ‘stand down’ order, we just couldn’t find support for. Not in the sense that others had interpreted it. He was certainly told, ‘do not go to Benghazi,’ but as we say, there was a reason why.”
“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Gazoo

  • Inactive Members
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,968
It is hard to keep up with all the lies. But I do recall a scathing article out essentially blaming Patrick Kennedy at the state dept. No one questions where he had the authority to call this. Of course the buck should stop with SOS Clinton and then Obama but they love to blame others and act like the others were acting in a rogue manner and then not firing them.
"The Tea Party has a right to feel cheated.

When does the Republican Party, put in the majority by the Tea Party, plan to honor its commitment to halt the growth of the Federal monolith and bring the budget back into balance"?

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo