Author Topic: Ultimate American presidential throwdown: Reagan smashes Obama's first 5 years in office  (Read 171 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 69,670
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Ultimate American Presidential Throwdown: Reagan Smashes Obama's First 5 Years in Office 

Michael Hausam | On 07, Feb 2014
Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama each inherited unemployment rates in the mid 7% range.  Both presidents clearly stated their visions of how to address the country’s economic problems.

Comparing the results of their first five years in office, which vision actually worked?

Reagan’s Economic Growth Tripled Obama’s

◾Average GDP growth for Reagan’s first 5 years: 8.8%
◾Average GDP growth for Obama’s first 5 years: 2.7%

Median income under Obama went down

◾Median household income growth for Reagan’s first 5 years: 7.7%
◾Median household income growth for Obama’s first 5 years: -4.8%

National Debt Added After 5 Years

◾National debt added over Reagan’s first 5 years: $1.015 trillion
◾National debt added over Obama’s first 5 years: $6.66 trillion

Reagan’s Job Creation Dwarfs Obama’s

◾Total jobs created in Reagan’s first 5 years: 5,700,000
◾Total jobs created in Obama’s first 5 years: 1,287,000

From Reagan’s 1980 acceptance speech:

“Well my view of government places trust not in one person or one Party, but in those values that transcend persons and parties. The — The trust is where it belongs — in the people.”

From Obama’s 2008 acceptance speech:

“Our government should work for us, not against us. It should help us, not hurt us. It should ensure opportunity not just for those with the most money and influence, but for every American who’s willing to work.”

The conclusion is obvious – unless you’re a Democrat who isn’t very good at math.

Ronald Reagan’s Jokes Remind Us Of His Greatness
« Last Edit: February 09, 2014, 08:11:28 AM by rangerrebew »
Constitutions are not designed for metaphysical or logical subtleties, for niceties of expression, for critical propriety, for elaborate shades of meaning, or for the exercise of philosophical acuteness or judicial research. They are instruments of a practical nature, founded on the common business of human life, adapted to common wants, designed for common use, and fitted for common understandings.

Joseph Story

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo