Author Topic: California's egg law challenged in midwest lawsuit  (Read 325 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65,230
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
California's egg law challenged in midwest lawsuit
« on: February 05, 2014, 02:10:17 PM »

California's egg law challenged in Midwest lawsuit



Mercury News wire services

Posted:   02/05/2014 08:44:17 AM PST | Updated:   about 5 hours ago






JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) -- Missouri's attorney general has asked a federal court to strike down a California law regulating the living conditions of chickens, setting up a cross-country battle that pits new animal protections against the economic interests of Midwestern farmers.

The lawsuit by Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster takes aim at a California law set to take effect in 2015 that prohibits eggs from being sold there if they come from hens raised in cages that don't comply with California's new size and space requirements.

Koster said Tuesday that the California law infringes on the interstate commerce protections of the U.S. Constitution by effectively imposing new requirements on out-of-state farmers.

"If California legislators are permitted to mandate the size of chicken coops on Missouri farms, they may just as easily demand that Missouri soybeans be harvested by hand or that Missouri corn be transported by solar-powered trucks," Koster said.

Missouri's lawsuit was filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Fresno, Calif.

California Attorney General Kamala Harris declined to comment on the suit Tuesday.

But the Humane Society of the United States, which campaigned for the ballot initiative, said in a statement that states have the right to pass laws that protect the health and safety of their residents. Jennifer Fearing, the group's senior state director for California, said eggs produced from hens in "battery cages" have a higher risk of salmonella contamination.

"Attorney General Koster's lawsuit targeting California's laws, filed just to curry favor with big agribusiness, threatens state laws across the country dealing with agriculture and food safety," she said.

California voters approved a ballot initiative in 2008 that required egg-laying hens, pigs and calves to be raised with enough space to allow the animals to lie down, stand up, turn around and fully extend their limbs. The measure gave farmers until 2015 to comply with the provisions.

After voters approved the initiative, concerns were raised that the measure would put California egg farmers at a competitive disadvantage with counterparts in other states.

In 2010, California legislators expanded the law to ban in that state the sale of eggs from any hens that were not raised in compliance with California's animal care standards. The California law cites concerns about protecting people from salmonella and other illnesses.

But the Missouri lawsuit said the real intent was to protect California farmers from being put at a disadvantage with their counterparts in other states.

U.S. Rep. Jared Huffman, a California Democrat who wrote the legislation when he was in the state Legislature, also declined to comment Tuesday.

Missouri farmers produce about 1.7 billion eggs annually and sell about one-third of those -- about 540 million eggs -- in California, according to Koster's lawsuit. He said that makes Missouri the second-largest egg exporter to California, behind only Iowa.

Many of Missouri's hens are raised in tight cages that won't meet California's new standards. Koster said Missouri farmers would have to spend about $120 million to remodel their cages or forgo sales to one of their most important markets, which could force some Missouri egg producers out of business.

Farm Sanctuary, an animal rescue and protection group based in Watkins Glen, N.Y., was among the organizations that helped fund the campaign for the California ballot initiative.

"It's a real embarrassment for the state of Missouri that Mr. Koster would defend a practice that is horribly abusive of animals with a legal theory that is tilting at windmills," said Bruce Friedrich, a senior policy director at Farm Sanctuary.

Missouri Farm Bureau President Blake Hurst praised the lawsuit as an important legal challenge. He said the California law, if upheld, could set a precedent in which the biggest states can effectively set agricultural policies for all the states.

"A pretty good tradition in this country that's worked pretty well is that we have free trade among the states, and we would not want to see that changed," Hurst said.

------

-- David Lieb, Associated Press

Associated Press writers Chris Blank in Jefferson City, Mo., and Juliet Williams in Sacramento, Calif. contributed to this report.

http://www.mercurynews.com/rss/ci_25067860?source=rss#
« Last Edit: February 05, 2014, 02:11:00 PM by rangerrebew »
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
Re: California's egg law challenged in midwest lawsuit
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2014, 03:09:29 PM »
This is a self-correcting problem.  Simply stop selling eggs to Kallyforneans and let them raise all of their own eggs themselves.


Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,939
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
    • The place where argument addicts can go
Re: California's egg law challenged in midwest lawsuit
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2014, 03:30:00 PM »
If one truly believes in government at the most local level, supports "states' rights" they would respect the rights of Californians to set rules for products.

For example the citizens of your state could have stipulated that new cars sold in the state, come equipped with seatbelts.

Or the citizens of your county could stipulate that alcohol not be sold on Sundays.

Finally, the Iowa and Missouri chicken ranchers could simply comply, to keep access to the valuable California markets.



Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
Re: California's egg law challenged in midwest lawsuit
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2014, 03:57:23 PM »
Quote
California voters approved a ballot initiative in 2008 that required egg-laying hens, pigs and calves to be raised with enough space to allow the animals to lie down, stand up, turn around and fully extend their limbs. The measure gave farmers until 2015 to comply with the provisions.

I actually agree with California on this.
“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline LambChop

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 245
Re: California's egg law challenged in midwest lawsuit
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2014, 04:04:19 PM »
If one truly believes in government at the most local level, supports "states' rights" they would respect the rights of Californians to set rules for products.

For example the citizens of your state could have stipulated that new cars sold in the state, come equipped with seatbelts.

Or the citizens of your county could stipulate that alcohol not be sold on Sundays.

Finally, the Iowa and Missouri chicken ranchers could simply comply, to keep access to the valuable California markets.

 :beer:

As long as the laws apply for all and not just out of state, there shouldn't be a problem.  It's their state, they have a right to say what they require to do business.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf