Author Topic: Grassley to DOJ: How about some transparency on Obama's Executive Orders?  (Read 237 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,163
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them

It isn't going to happen and Grassley knows it.  This is just political smoke and mirrors.



Grassley to DOJ: How About Some Transparency on Obama's Executive Orders?

Katie Pavlich

2/3/2014 2:30:00 PM - Katie Pavlich


 

Late last week President Obama released 12 new executive orders without the consent of Congress. The orders came on the same day of Obama's 2014 State of the Union address, when he threatened to go around Congress and the American people whenever necessary to "get things done."

Now, Republican Senator Chuck Grassley is asking for transparency on the orders and has sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder expressing concerns about Obama's lack of law enforcement for policies of which he disagrees.

"I am gravely concerned that the system of checks and balances enshrined in the Constitution is threatened by the President’s determination to take unilateral action if he cannot persuade Congress and the American people of the merits of his ideas. In short, while the President recently remarked that he has a pen and a phone, we have a Constitution that places limits on his use of them to issue Executive Orders," Grassley wrote. "My concern about the President’s proposed use of these orders is heightened by the Administration’s record of failing to discharge its constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” either by declining to enforce laws with which it does not agree or delaying or waiving portions of other laws to suit its convenience."

Grassley has requested Holder direct the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel to publicly disclose opinions, analyses and conclusions regarding the legality of all the Executive Orders to be issued by President Obama.

During President Obama's tenure, the Department of Justice has refused to enforce certain laws the administration disagrees with, rather than legally change them. For example, in 2011 Holder announced the Department would no longer enforce the Defense of Marriage Act. In addition, we've seen President Obama change parts of the Affordable Care Act without Congressional approval.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/02/03/grassley-to-doj-how-about-some-transparency-on-obamas-executive-orders-n1788941?utm_source=TopBreakingNewsCarousel&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=BreakingNewsCarousel
« Last Edit: February 04, 2014, 06:34:51 AM by rangerrebew »
"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim tribute to patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness -- these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. . . . reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principles."
George Washington

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
Benjamin Franklin


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf