Author Topic: Lawmakers won't have to disclose crop insurance subsidies they receive  (Read 208 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,331
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them


On The Money feed 

January 29, 2014, 02:06 pm
Lawmakers won’t have to disclose the farm subsidies they receive
   
 


By Erik Wasson


A provision requiring members of Congress and the administration to disclose what crop insurance subsidies they receive was quietly dropped from the farm bill that the House passed on Wednesday.

 

Section 11001 of the House-passed farm bill had a provision that “requires disclosure (by name) of the amount of crop insurance assistance received by Members of Congress, Cabinet Secretaries, and members of their immediate families.”

 

That provision was taken out in closed-door conference negotiations before the bill was released on Monday. The bill cleared the House in less than 72 hours, before many lawmakers had a chance to review it, and now heads to the Senate.

 

Taxpayers for Common Sense spotted the change in the bill.

 

“Considering a bunch of lawmakers receive those subsidies (including those on the Conference Committee) it’s a wonder how it got in there in the first place,” said Taxpayers for Common Sense staffer Steve Ellis.

 

In 2012, 15 members of Congress received direct farm commodity payments according to an analysis by the Environmental Working Group. Direct crop payments are already public, while crop insurance premium assistance has not been subject to disclosure in the past.

 

With the new farm bill, that secrecy will continue.
.

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/agriculture/196856-lawmakers-wont-have-to-disclose-crop-insurance-subsidies-under#ixzz2rt0BAyAl
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
« Last Edit: January 30, 2014, 07:58:45 AM by rangerrebew »
There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics. There must be a positive passion for the public good, the public interest, honour, power and glory, established in the minds of the people, or there can be no republican government, nor any real liberty: and this public passion must be superior to all private passions. John Adams


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf