Author Topic: Another ex-official may be subpoenaed by N.J. state legislature  (Read 499 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
Re: Another ex-official may be subpoenaed by N.J. state legislature
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2014, 05:53:53 PM »

Rebecca Berg ?@rebeccagberg
Not fired by Christie yet: His press sec Michael Drewniak. But these new emails show Drewniak was very much enmeshed in the bridge scheme...  From the new emails released today, it becomes clear Bill Stepien, Bridget Kelly, Michael Drewniak were all working closely with Wildstein.  Drewniak writes to Wildstein about trying to circumvent some of Christie's more senior communications staff, such as Maria Comella.  Example of Wildstein and Drewniak trying to work around Maria Comella and Charles McKenna, Christie's counsel


 
« Last Edit: January 10, 2014, 05:55:41 PM by Rapunzel »

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
Re: Another ex-official may be subpoenaed by N.J. state legislature
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2014, 06:04:05 PM »

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 48,223
  • TBR Illuminati
Re: Another ex-official may be subpoenaed by N.J. state legislature
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2014, 06:06:40 PM »
Rebecca Berg ?@rebeccagberg
Not fired by Christie yet: His press sec Michael Drewniak. But these new emails show Drewniak was very much enmeshed in the bridge scheme...  From the new emails released today, it becomes clear Bill Stepien, Bridget Kelly, Michael Drewniak were all working closely with Wildstein.  Drewniak writes to Wildstein about trying to circumvent some of Christie's more senior communications staff, such as Maria Comella.  Example of Wildstein and Drewniak trying to work around Maria Comella and Charles McKenna, Christie's counsel


 

I have to say that this is circumstantial evidence that Christie wasn't involved in the original affair; why would they be trying to circumvent other top Christie aides if they were all playing on the same side?

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
Re: Another ex-official may be subpoenaed by N.J. state legislature
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2014, 06:11:22 PM »
I have to say that this is circumstantial evidence that Christie wasn't involved in the original affair; why would they be trying to circumvent other top Christie aides if they were all playing on the same side?

Don't know.  But why has he not fired everyone involved?  This is an example of how big government is out of control regardless the political party...... machine politics is machine politics be it Chicago, Detroit or New Jersey. 

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 48,223
  • TBR Illuminati
Re: Another ex-official may be subpoenaed by N.J. state legislature
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2014, 06:15:39 PM »
Don't know.  But why has he not fired everyone involved?  This is an example of how big government is out of control regardless the political party...... machine politics is machine politics be it Chicago, Detroit or New Jersey. 

Put it another way:  if he really was involved, wouldn't he have fired everyone immediately to make it look like he was being tough on them?  Their silence would be easily bought by working out comfy severance packages after the public's focus moves on to something else (in a few days or so).  So not firing everyone immediately is also circumstantial evidence that he wasn't in on it.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
Re: Another ex-official may be subpoenaed by N.J. state legislature
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2014, 06:19:51 PM »
Put it another way:  if he really was involved, wouldn't he have fired everyone immediately to make it look like he was being tough on them?  Their silence would be easily bought by working out comfy severance packages after the public's focus moves on to something else (in a few days or so).  So not firing everyone immediately is also circumstantial evidence that he wasn't in on it.

No.  I would have fired everyone involved in the email exchanges.  Period.  Then people would have known he was serious about cleaning house.

and... read the December 2013 expose about Christie.  He has a reputation of punishing anyone who says anything about him.  In other words - just like Obama he is VERY thin-skinned.  The NYT article was written before the GW Bridge story became headline news nationally and when you read it there becomes a nagging suspicion since the man has a habit of punishing his enemies at the very least he set a standard that it was okay to do things like this.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2014, 06:23:11 PM by Rapunzel »


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf