Author Topic: NYT: John Kerry getting pretty excited about orchestrating what he’s sure, this time, will be a successful global climate treaty  (Read 244 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/01/06/nyt-john-kerry-getting-pretty-excited-about-orchestrating-what-hes-sure-this-time-will-be-a-successful-global-climate-treaty/

NYT: John Kerry getting pretty excited about orchestrating what he’s sure, this time, will be a successful global climate treaty
posted at 8:41 pm on January 6, 2014 by Erika Johnsen

I’m not sure how many examples of the futility of the grandiose worldwide-climate-treaty scheme we need before globalist-minded, big-government bureaucrats will finally wise up to the reality that political interests pitted against economic ones is always unsustainable in the long run, but evidently… at least one more. Via the NYT:

   
Quote
But while the public’s attention has been on his diplomacy in the Middle East, behind the scenes at the State Department Mr. Kerry has initiated a systematic, top-down push to create an agencywide focus on global warming.

    His goal is to become the lead broker of a global climate treaty in 2015 that will commit the United States and other nations to historic reductions in fossil fuel pollution.

    Whether the secretary of state can have that kind of influence remains an open question, and Mr. Kerry, despite two decades of attention to climate policy, has few concrete accomplishments on the issue. The climate bills he sponsored as a senator failed. At the United Nations climate summit meeting in Copenhagen in 2009, Mr. Kerry, then a senator from Massachusetts, labored behind the scenes to help President Obama broker a treaty that yielded pledges from countries to cut their emissions but failed to produce legally binding commitments. …

    Shortly after Mr. Kerry was sworn in last February, he issued a directive that all meetings between senior American diplomats and top foreign officials include a discussion of climate change. He put top climate policy specialists on his State Department personal staff. And he is pursuing smaller climate deals in forums like the Group of 20, the countries that make up the world’s largest economies. …

    Not only must he handle difficult negotiations with China — the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases — for the 2015 treaty, but the pact must be ratified by a Senate that has a long record of rejecting climate change legislation. “In all candor, I don’t care where he is, nothing is going to happen in the Senate for a long time,” Mr. McCain said.

No kidding. It’s never been a secret that John Kerry holds the ambition of donning the green mantle of environmentalist knighthood so close to his heart, but it’s still a mystery to me why so many Democrats and their ultra-progressive ilk the world over insist upon wasting everybody’s time and resources pushing for a top-down, one-size-fits-all regulatory agenda that treats environmental quality and economic prosperity as if they are mutually exclusive. The United Nation, et al’s ideas for these magnanimous treaties (the latest fizzled iteration of which just went down last November, although they’re hoping to revive things in time for the big Paris meeting in 2015) only seem to result in a recipe for mutual impoverishment, rather than gunning for the free-market, free-trade growth that is the real driver of efficiencies, innovations, and alternative technologies that can help the world reach cleaner goals.

Incidentally, you can bet that Kerry’s climate-treaty eagerness is a behind-the-scenes factor under consideration in the (dis)approval/delay of the Keystone XL pipeline; as the NYT notes, “approval of the pipeline could blacken Mr. Kerry’s green credentials and hurt his ability to get a broader climate deal” — and does he ever want that climate deal.
“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Atomic Cow

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,235
  • High Yield Minion
Thanks to Reid going nuclear, there is little chance they will get much out of the Republicans in the Senate for the rest of the year.  Reid poisoned that well big time.
"...And these atomic bombs which science burst upon the world that night were strange, even to the men who used them."  H. G. Wells, The World Set Free, 1914

"The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying elections." -Lord Acton

Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,699
  • Conspiracy engineer. Low rates.
Thanks to Reid going nuclear, there is little chance they will get much out of the Republicans in the Senate for the rest of the year.  Reid poisoned that well big time.

I have a question for those in the know.

Is it possible - should the Democrats lose control of the Senate this year - for them to remove the nuclear option before the new Senators are sworn in and bar it from ever being used again?
The fastest way to a man's heart? Inch to the right of the breastbone, between the fourth and fifth rib.

Every time I start to feel boring, I remember there is a monthly magazine devoted to elevators.

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Offline Atomic Cow

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,235
  • High Yield Minion
I have a question for those in the know.

Is it possible - should the Democrats lose control of the Senate this year - for them to remove the nuclear option before the new Senators are sworn in and bar it from ever being used again?

I don't think it is possible for one Congress to bind the next one forever, short of amending the Constitution.
"...And these atomic bombs which science burst upon the world that night were strange, even to the men who used them."  H. G. Wells, The World Set Free, 1914

"The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying elections." -Lord Acton

Offline Oceander

  • Technical
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 42,737
  • #NeverTrumpForever
I have a question for those in the know.

Is it possible - should the Democrats lose control of the Senate this year - for them to remove the nuclear option before the new Senators are sworn in and bar it from ever being used again?

They can remove it, but they cannot prevent a future Senate from putting it right back in.

Online EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,699
  • Conspiracy engineer. Low rates.
Thank you both.

Happen I am getting a mite too suspicious in old age.
The fastest way to a man's heart? Inch to the right of the breastbone, between the fourth and fifth rib.

Every time I start to feel boring, I remember there is a monthly magazine devoted to elevators.

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 53,090
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
I have a question for those in the know.

Is it possible - should the Democrats lose control of the Senate this year - for them to remove the nuclear option before the new Senators are sworn in and bar it from ever being used again?

Whether or not they can, it would look awfully bad politically for them to try to undo what they had just done for the "good of the country."
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves. Abraham Lincoln

Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power. Abraham Lincoln

Be sure you put your feet in the right place, then stand firm. Abraham Lincoln


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf