Author Topic: My comparisons of Nazi Germany media and the Obama media  (Read 382 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,296
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
My comparisons of Nazi Germany media and the Obama media
« on: December 25, 2013, 03:30:41 PM »
Writing the News



Reflecting in his diary (April 14, 1943) during the war on the press's loss of independence, Joseph Goebbels, a one-time journalist, wrote: "Any man who still has a residue of honor will be very careful not to become a journalist."

When Hitler came to power in 1933, Germany had a well-developed communications infrastructure. Over 4,700 daily and weekly newspapers were published annually in Germany, more newspapers than in any other industrialized nation, with a total circulation of 25 million. Although Berlin was the press capital, small town presses dominated newspaper circulation (81% of all German newspapers were locally-owned). Eight papers published in larger cities, however, had established international reputations. Germany's movie industry ranked among the world's largest, its films had won international acclaim, and it had pioneered in the development of both radio and television.

Establishing Control of the Press

When Hitler took power in 1933, the Nazis controlled less than three percent of Germany's 4,700 papers. The elimination of the multiparty political system not only brought about the demise of hundreds of newspapers produced by outlawed political parties; it also allowed the state to seize the printing plants and equipment of the Communist and Social Democratic Parties, which were often turned over directly to the Nazi Party. In the following months, the Nazis established control or exerted influence over independent press organs. During the first weeks of 1933, the Nazi regime deployed the radio, press, and newsreels to stoke fears of a pending “Communist uprising,” ( today its conservatives, the wealthy, Christians, patriots) then channeled popular anxieties into political measures that eradicated civil liberties and democracy.   ( today -1st Amendment freedom of speech, the free exercise clause of the 1st Amendment, the 2nd Amendment under attack)
Within months, the Nazi regime destroyed Germany's previously vigorous free press. By 1941, the Nazi Party's Eher publishing house had become the largest ever in German history, and its main daily newspaper, the Völkischer Beobachter (The National Observer) had reached a circulation of over 1,000,000.

The newspaper Völkischer Beobachter (People's Observer), which Hitler had purchased for the party in 1920, announced meetings and other news to members and extended the party's reach beyond the beer hall and Party gathering. Circulation rose along with the success of the Nazi movement, reaching more than 120,000 in 1931 and 1.7 million by 1944. Edited by the antisemitic writer and Nazi ideologue Alfred Rosenberg, the Völkischer Beobachter specialized in short hyperboles of favorite Nazi themes: the humiliation of the Versailles Treaty, the weakness of Weimar parliamentarianism, and the evil of world Jewry and Bolshevism (today - business people, conservatism, successful people, the military, Christianity) , all of which were contrasted with Nazi patriotic slogans.

One Man, One Paper

Der Stürmer was the most notorious, antisemitic newspaper in Germany. Nazi provincial leader [Gauleiter] Julius Streicher, a former schoolteacher turned Nazi activist, edited and directed the paper.

The newspaper ran for more than 20 years, from 1923 to 1945, publishing lurid tales of Jewish “ritual murder,” sex crimes, and financial malfeasance. During the Weimar Republic, the outrageous and libelous claims (today - Chris Matthews, Ed Schultz, HuffPo, Al Shaprton, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC) of Der Stürmer frequently resulted in lawsuits filed by outraged politicians and Jewish organizations against Streicher himself and the newspaper.

Following the Nazi takeover, however, the fortunes of the paper and its editor skyrocketed. Circulation dramatically increased from 14,000 in 1927 to almost 500,000 in 1935. Though foreign visitors and many Germans, including some Nazi propagandists, found the one-topic newspaper offensive, Hitler refused to close down Der Stürmer, even after a Nazi Party Court stripped Streicher of his political and Party offices because of corruption.

During the 1930s, Germans could find Der Stürmer on sidewalks and street corners throughout Germany. Streicher set up numerous display cases to promote his antisemitic propaganda and increase circulation. To fill all these display boxes and subscriptions, he sometimes increased print runs of the newspaper to 2,000,000.

Jewish Newspapers as Communal Response

Even as the Nazi propaganda machine hijacked the German press in service of its racist ideology (today - anti-American, anti-family, anti-Christian) , newspapers published by local Jewish communities (Gemeinden) for their members became a life-line for Jews in towns and cities across Germany and a link between local communities and the leaders of Jewish national organizations.

After the nation-wide boycott of Jewish businesses in April 1933, Arno Herzberg, bureau chief of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency in Berlin, wrote: “The new circumstances in which German Jewry now finds itself have also heralded a new era for the Jewish press. This new era has ushered in far-reaching tasks for Jewish journalism. Beforehand, the Jewish press led a quiet existence. It was peripheral to the concerns of the average German Jew … All this has changed fundamentally in the era in which Jews are excluded from broad German intellectual and social circles.”

These communal newspapers published articles and editorials meant to strengthen a positive Jewish identity in the face of degrading official antisemitic propaganda, (today - anti-Obama, anti-big government, pro gun rights, pro freedom of speech) and to provide the members of the community with advice and encouragement for meeting the daily challenges created by life under the Nazi anti-Jewish legislation. As more and more Jews emigrated from Germany, many smaller Gemeinden disappeared and their newspapers closed. On November 11, 1938, following the violence of the Kristallnacht pogrom, the German government forbade the remaining Jewish communal newspapers to publish. Jews now had to receive all news and official announcements from the government-controlled Jüdisches Nachrichtenblatt.

German authorities did not require Jewish communal newspapers to adhere to the regulations imposed on the German press at large. For instance, Jewish publications were not obligated to publish word for word the talking points or repeat the official propaganda issued by the Ministry of Propaganda at its daily press conferences. German authorities did forbid non-Jews either to purchase or read these Jewish communal newspapers.

New Avenues for Propaganda: Film, Radio, Television
The Nazis understood the power and attraction of emerging technologies, such as film, loudspeakers, radio, and television, in the service of propaganda (today - social media, twitter, face book, etc.) . These technologies offered the Nazi leadership a means for mass dissemination of their ideological messages and a vehicle for reinforcing the myth of the Volksgemeinschaft (National Community) through communal listening and viewing experiences.

After 1933, German radio broadcast Hitler's speeches into homes, factories, and even onto city streets through loudspeakers. Officials in Goebbels' Ministry of Propaganda saw the tremendous promise of radio for propaganda. The ministry heavily subsidized the creation of the inexpensive “People's Radio” (Volksempfänger) to facilitate sales. By 1935, about 1.5 million of these radios were sold, giving Germany one of the largest radio-listening publics in the world.

In 1935, Germany became the first nation to introduce regular television service. Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels saw the great propaganda potential of the new medium, but believed it was best experienced through collective viewing, like the cinema or theater.

Behind the Headlines: Nazi Media Manipulation-Kristallnacht
On the night of November 9/10, 1938, Nazi leaders instigated a wave of violence (today - Occupy Wall Street, black panthers, threats from Jackson and Sharpton) that devastated Jewish communities throughout the Greater German Reich and outraged world opinion. At the urging of Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, local and regional Nazi leaders engaged in wanton destruction and brutality, using the assassination of a German diplomat in Paris by an angry Jewish teenager (like Trayvon) to justify the violence. On Kristallnacht (the Night of Broken Glass), rioters damaged or destroyed some 7,500 Jewish businesses, torched hundreds of synagogues, and murdered 91 Jews. During the following days, the German Security Police arrested up to 30,000 Jewish men and incarcerated them in Buchenwald, Dachau, and Sachsenhausen concentration camps.

Even as newspapers around the world reported on the events and consequences of Kristallnacht, the German Propaganda Ministry's (ABC. NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC) engaged in serious damage control through a stage-managed media campaign that sought to justify the passions behind the violence by attributing it to “spontaneous outrage” ( like the spontaneous "outrage" at Benghazi) of the German people, and to minimize the actual scale of the death and destruction.

The behind-the-scenes press manipulation surrounding this event reveals the information- and damage-control operations of the Nazi propaganda machine (to both the German and international public) and how quickly it responded to outside criticism and breaking news. (Just as it does today with Obamacare)

Forbidden Broadcasts: Foreign Radio as an Alternative Source of News

During times of war, governments generally restrict and censor public access to information in order to prevent sensitive data leaking to the enemy or to isolate the domestic population from information that might undermine public morale. After Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, the Nazi regime implemented draconian measures to prevent its population from receiving outside information. The German government prohibited its citizens to listen to foreign broadcasts, making doing so a criminal offense. German courts could sentence persons who disseminated stories gleaned from enemy radio stations to prison terms or even death.

Guided by fears that Allied propaganda in World War I had eroded German morale and encouraged unrest, German authorities hoped that the threat of severe punishment for listening to foreign broadcasts would reinforce efforts to insulate the population from enemy “lies.” In spite of the watchful eyes and ears of Gestapo and Nazi Party informants, millions of Germans tuned in to the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and other forbidden broadcasting stations to gather information.

http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007821
« Last Edit: December 25, 2013, 03:32:25 PM by rangerrebew »
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
Re: My comparisons of Nazi Germany media and the Obama media
« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2013, 04:50:25 PM »
You are just a ray of Merry Sunshine on Christmas Day, aren't you?

 :whistle:

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,296
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Re: My comparisons of Nazi Germany media and the Obama media
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2013, 08:58:33 AM »
You are just a ray of Merry Sunshine on Christmas Day, aren't you?

 :whistle:

So was Hitler thought to be.  So was Obama thought to be.  So was Castro thought to be.  The one thing we don't need is a Hitleresque government in America but it appears that is what the people want.
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Offline mountaineer

  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 34,596
Re: My comparisons of Nazi Germany media and the Obama media
« Reply #3 on: December 26, 2013, 09:04:32 AM »
I recall reading in Victor Klemperer's memoir "I Will Bear Witness" that the German authorities eventually seized typewriters from private individuals, or at least from Jewish individuals like he (Klemperer was a professor of literature). That may be the functional equivalent of our current administration's desire to exercise greater control over the internet. The typewritten newsletter of 1938, which could be passed around a neighborhood or within a group of like-minded people, is a lot like the Facebook page of 2013.
Just being unique doesn't make you useful.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,296
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Re: My comparisons of Nazi Germany media and the Obama media
« Reply #4 on: December 26, 2013, 09:07:50 AM »
I recall reading in Victor Klemperer's memoir "I Will Bear Witness" that the German authorities eventually seized typewriters from private individuals, or at least from Jewish individuals like he (Klemperer was a professor of literature). That may be the functional equivalent of our current administration's desire to exercise greater control over the internet. The typewritten newsletter of 1938, which could be passed around a neighborhood or within a group of like-minded people, is a lot like the Facebook page of 2013.

Yes, we have already seen the United Nitwits trying to seize the internet and congress has passed laws giving control to the POTUS under certain situations.  It has started and your analogy is spot on. :patriot:
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Offline aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,675
  • Congrats Donald Trump! 45th POTUS!
Re: My comparisons of Nazi Germany media and the Obama media
« Reply #5 on: December 26, 2013, 09:23:51 AM »
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" – George Santayana

"We remember, yet, still, we repeat mistakes of the past" – aligncare
Some #NeverTrumpers are like the pockets of Japanese who didn't know the war was over

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,296
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Re: My comparisons of Nazi Germany media and the Obama media
« Reply #6 on: December 26, 2013, 10:55:06 AM »
"We remember, yet, still, we repeat mistakes of the past" – aligncare

That is almost true, IMO.  The liberals are always "tweaking" history to make it more to their liking therefore history is always changing and mistakes of liberals being cleansed.  You can't learn from what doesn't exist. **nononono*
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Offline aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,675
  • Congrats Donald Trump! 45th POTUS!
Re: My comparisons of Nazi Germany media and the Obama media
« Reply #7 on: December 26, 2013, 12:51:08 PM »
Excellent point, ranger. Stalin was also a master of "disappearing" people and events from history.

SOP for the left, I guess.
Some #NeverTrumpers are like the pockets of Japanese who didn't know the war was over

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,296
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Re: My comparisons of Nazi Germany media and the Obama media
« Reply #8 on: December 26, 2013, 05:12:34 PM »
Excellent point, ranger. Stalin was also a master of "disappearing" people and events from history.

SOP for the left, I guess.

The Clinton's aren't too bad in that area themselves.
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf