Author Topic: Politico claims one top story of 2013 was 'President Obama loses the media'  (Read 300 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 56,959
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Politico Claims One Top Story of 2013 Was 'President Obama Loses the Media'

By Tim Graham

Created 12/23/2013 - 9:55am

 
   
Politico media reporters Dylan Byers and Hadas Gold have assembled a list of “2013's biggest media stories.” A few items down the list is the provocatively titled “President Obama loses the media.”

 “If 2008 was Barack Obama’s honeymoon period with the press, 2013 was the year of the divorce,” claimed Byers and Gold. Did these pundits miss the Barbara Walters interview? They elaborated:

Five years ago, the media was seen as being so sympathetic to the junior senator from Illinois that it irked his Democratic challengers. But in his second term as president the tone of both the news coverage and the editorial commentary has become far more critical.

 Since the second inauguration, Obama has been accused of being arrogant in private, ineffective on domestic policy and just plain confusing on foreign policy. His White House has antagonized the press corps by limiting media access, while the troubled Obamacare rollout has brought on the most sustained media criticism of his five years in office.

 Instead of courting the reporting press, Obama has shown a strong preference for private, off-the-record meetings with pundits and columnists. While these sessions are valued by all involved, they also have fed the perception that Obama is most interested in being regarded as smart by the people he regards as smart.

That’s a revealing summary of the press's feelings, if not the press coverage. It doesn’t reflect the pattern for the whole year. Yes, it’s been a rough last quarter of the year with the unmissable fiasco of the Obamacare website. But even there, the “divorcees” of the press have been trying to turn around the bad news and help Obama dig out.

 As in the second Clinton term, the big change in media coverage is that the White House beat vanishes a little, gets buried under celebrity fluff and weather and other News Lite topics that goose the ratings. There’s less Obama puffery, but it’s still nothing like the slings and arrows of Bush’s second term, where even the hurricanes were the president’s fault.

It might feel like harsh weather out there in the media, considering Obama's dismal approval numbers, but that's happened despite the media coverage, not because of it. Syrup from Barbara Walters and Steve Harvey can only accomplish so much.
There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics. There must be a positive passion for the public good, the public interest, honour, power and glory, established in the minds of the people, or there can be no republican government, nor any real liberty: and this public passion must be superior to all private passions. John Adams

Offline rb224315

  • Custom Title goes here
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 588
  • Personal Text goes here
Obama hasn't lost the media.  The headline helps sell ads and perhaps the media are unhappy with him, but there's no way he has lost them.  Think of it this way:  if last year's election were held today, how many members of the media would vote for Romney for president?  What about any other prominent Republican?  Just as I'm sure there were plenty of Republicans who supported Nixon no matter what he did, the media will never abandon the Dems unless the GOP continues to capitulate & becomes indistinguishable from the Dems, and even then they wouldn't leave their home on the left.  They'd have no reason to.

If Politico were honest they'd say "Obama's policies are so bad that the MSM had no choice to report on them even though it makes the president look bad".  That's not losing the media, it's the media having to (somewhat) do their job because they really have no choice if they are to maintain the illusion of credibility.
rb224315:  just another "Creepy-ass Cracka".

Offline Relic

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,967
Obama hasn't lost the media.  The headline helps sell ads and perhaps the media are unhappy with him, but there's no way he has lost them.  Think of it this way:  if last year's election were held today, how many members of the media would vote for Romney for president?  What about any other prominent Republican?  Just as I'm sure there were plenty of Republicans who supported Nixon no matter what he did, the media will never abandon the Dems unless the GOP continues to capitulate & becomes indistinguishable from the Dems, and even then they wouldn't leave their home on the left.  They'd have no reason to.

If Politico were honest they'd say "Obama's policies are so bad that the MSM had no choice to report on them even though it makes the president look bad".  That's not losing the media, it's the media having to (somewhat) do their job because they really have no choice if they are to maintain the illusion of credibility.

You've nailed it.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf