Author Topic: Cuts for military retirees costing GOP support for budget dea  (Read 244 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 250,309
Cuts for military retirees costing GOP support for budget dea
« on: December 16, 2013, 01:12:30 PM »
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2013/12/16/cuts-for-military-retirees-costs-gop-support-for-budget-deal/

Cuts for military retirees costing GOP support for budget deal

    By Josh Hicks   
    December 16 at 6:00 am

GOP lawmakers and military groups have lined up against the bipartisan budget deal making its way through Congress because of a provision that would trim pay for young military retirees.

In a joint statement last week, Sens. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) said they cannot support the legislation because it “disproportionately and unfairly targets those who have put their lives on the line to defend our country.”

The budget agreement, crafted by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), would reduce cost-of-living adjustments for working-age military retirees by 1 percent starting in December 2015, although the existing rate would apply again once former service members reach age 62.

The proposed change is projected to save the government $6 billion, but Ayotte said it “pays for more federal spending on the backs of our active duty and military retirees.”

The Veterans of Foreign Wars estimated it would reduce the benefits for a typical enlisted person who retires at age 40 by $80,000 by age 62.

Republicans who oppose the cut have called for alternative cost-reduction measures, saying they will not otherwise support the budget deal. However, it is unclear whether that opposition will be enough to stop the Senate from approving the plan, which is needed to head off another government shutdown.

The Senate is scheduled to vote on the measure Tuesday. Passage of the bill, which also also increases the amount future federal workers would pay into their retirement plans, would represent a breakthrough in the partisan logjam that has repeatedly crippled the Capitol.

On the Democratic side, Sen. Carl Levin (Mich.) offered hope that the military-retiree provision could be revisited after the bill is passed. He said in a statement last week that the Senate Armed Services Committee, which he chairs, would review the change next year, adding that “a number of concerns have been raised about the provision.”

Levin did not comment on whether he supports the retirement provision, and his office declined to offer a position.

Military groups criticized the proposed reduction in retirement pay, saying it could affect retention in the armed forces. “Currently serving members look at how they, their families, retirees and survivors have been treated when making career choices,” said Vice Adm. Norb Ryan, president of the Military Officers Association of America.

VFW National Commander William Thien said in a separate statement: ”The last thing our nation can afford is a mass exodus of mid-career enlisted and officers because they no longer feel welcome or in control of their military careers.”

Support the USO

Offline Atomic Cow

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,235
  • High Yield Minion
Re: Cuts for military retirees costing GOP support for budget dea
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2013, 01:33:22 PM »
And yet my idiot Congresscritter voted for this deal claiming it was "for the troops."
"...And these atomic bombs which science burst upon the world that night were strange, even to the men who used them."  H. G. Wells, The World Set Free, 1914

"The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying elections." -Lord Acton

Offline MBB1984

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 853
Re: Cuts for military retirees costing GOP support for budget dea
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2013, 02:34:32 PM »
And yet my idiot Congresscritter voted for this deal claiming it was "for the troops."

And the Congresscritter wins as most of the voters are too ignorant concerning the details of the bill.  Good to see more Senators voicing their opposition against this bill, but I am afraid it is all window dressing.  If it comes down to an up or down vote, the left has the votes to pass. 

Interesting that the vast majority of the GOP Senators will vote no, while a significant majority of the GOP Representatives voted yes.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf