Author Topic: Obama administration may add taxpayer-funded sex-change operations to ObamaCare, Medicare, Medicaid  (Read 882 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/obama-administration-may-add-taxpayer-funded-sex-change-operations-to-obama

Obama administration may add taxpayer-funded sex-change operations to ObamaCare, Medicare, Medicaid

by Dustin Siggins

    Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:50 EST

DES MOINES, IA, December 12, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is one of the most controversial laws in America because of its mandates, taxes, and coverage of elective abortions with a $1 surcharge. Now, there may be another reason for debate on the law's merits: taxpayer-funded “gender reassignment” surgery.

The law may fund costs related to gender reassignment, according to Andi Medici in FederalTimes.com.

Since 1981, federal law has barred federal tax dollars from paying for "transsexual surgery" through programs like Medicare and Medicaid. On December 2, the HHS Department's appeals board decided that the “National Coverage Determination” should be reconsidered, opening the door to taxpayer-funded sex-change operations.

Medici adds that Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, conventionally known as ObamaCare, no longer explicitly states that the federal subsidies will not require coverage for transgender-related surgeries.

Since the ACA does prevent "discrimination" on the basis of gender identity, however, and the federal government is publicly revisiting a 1981 law preventing federal coverage of “gender reassignment” surgery and related costs, it is possible the federal government will be covering those costs under the ACA, Medicare, Medicaid, and the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program.

Anand Kalra, Project Health program manager at the Transgender Law Center, told The Advocate that the Affordable Care Act already provides a great deal of coverage potential to transgender people, particularly because “gender identity disorder” is considered a pre-existing condition, something insurance companies can no longer use as a criteria for rejecting coverage.

Kalra also described how Medicaid expansion and federal subsidies for ACA exchanges will cover transgender people looking for health insurance and health care coverage. LifeSiteNews.com reached out to the Transgender Law Center to clarify what the cost and coverage for transgender services might be under the ACA, but multiple requests for comment were not returned.

Both the Medicare and Medicaid programs face financial difficulties that could be worsened by further mandates of coverage. National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) Senior Fellow Devon Herrick told LifeSiteNews.com that while “individual mandates often add little to the cost of health coverage, they all add up. There are nearly 2,300 mandated benefits and mandated services across all 50 states, [and] the Affordable Care Act added new ones.”


Herrick said that he knew “of no estimates of the cost of transgender care,” but the NCPA and other researchers “have estimated mandates increase the cost of health coverage by about 25 percent.  The PPACA boosts premiums by a further 41 percent on average.

The federal government has been under pressure to change laws regarding coverage for transgender people for years. In October, The Washington Times reported on two transgender women who demanded federal law be changed to stop alleged discrimination that does not allow federal grant coverage for mammograms for transgender "women."

Contact:

The HHS Departmental Appeals Board

Phone: 202-565-0200
Fax: 202-565-0224

Department of Health and Human Services
Departmental Appeals Board, MS 6127
Appellate Division
330 Independence Ave., S.W.
Cohen Building - Room G-644
Washington, D.C. 20201

Chair, Constance B. Tobias
Phone.......:   202-565-0200

Deputy Chair, Leslie A. Sussan
Phone.......:   202-565-0200

Member, Sheila A. Hegy
Phone.......:   202-565-0200
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline EC

  • Shanghaied Editor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,804
  • Gender: Male
  • Cats rule. Dogs drool.
Oh, man. One of my friends is going to be so pissed. She scrimped and saved for 15 YEARS, living in a cheap efficiency apartment in a bad neighborhood and working two jobs constantly to raise the cash for her surgery and pay for her hormone therapy (that stuff isn't cheap).

She had the final op two weeks ago. Talk about bad timing.  **nononono*
The universe doesn't hate you. Unless your name is Tsutomu Yamaguchi

Avatar courtesy of Oceander

I've got a website now: Smoke and Ink

rangerrebew

  • Guest
They are going to add this to the law?  Is that without congressional approval?  If so, there is no law, only a massive tax boondoggle where people add or delete coverage as necessary.

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,621
  • Gender: Male
  • Your what hurts??
Why not??  Who is going to stop them??  This is just as unconstitutional as any of the other changes this crew have been allowed to make to a standing law, and nobody in the Congress has made a move to challenge Obama on any of it.