Author Topic: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL  (Read 824 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« on: December 12, 2013, 11:35:08 pm »
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2013, 11:35:46 pm »
http://blogs.rollcall.com/218/house-passes-budget-deal-prewrite/

House Passes Budget Deal

By Emma Dumain   Posted at 6:30 p.m. Dec. 12

murray ryan 041 111313 445x312 House Passes Budget Deal

The House passed a budget agreement Thursday night that, though modest, could fundamentally change how Capitol Hill functions for the remainder of the 113th Congress.

Lawmakers voted 332-94 on the deal negotiated by House Budget Chairman Paul D. Ryan, R-Wis., and Senate Budget Chairwoman Patty Murray, D-Wash.

Breaking the vote down by party, Republicans were split 169-62, while Democrats divided themselves 163-32.

The vote was a difficult one for many members.

For some Republicans, the bill didn’t cut deeply enough or go far enough to mirror the types of changes that conservatives heralded in Ryan’s signature House-passed budget blueprints.

They also had to contend with the chorus of calls to oppose the deal from influential outside conservative advocacy groups, such as Heritage Action for America, the Club for Growth and Americans for Prosperity.

For some Democrats, it was difficult to get beyond the fact that the deal didn’t create new revenue through tax increases, and that it was not tied to an extension of emergency unemployment insurance aid, set to expire before the end of the year.

But enough lawmakers from both parties held their noses as Ryan counseled “not to let the perfect be the enemy of the good,” and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., urged her caucus to “embrace the suck” of the agreement.

The plan sets a $1.012 trillion discretionary spending level for 2013 — halfway between the $967 billion sequester level and the far-higher number Democrats were seeking. It also sets a $1.014 trillion for 2014. It finds savings through recalculating federal workforce pensions and requiring government employees to contribute more toward retirement, something Democrats were sour on as well.

The Senate is expected to take up the measure next week, when the chamber will still be in session. The House is set to adjourn on Friday and will return in early January.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2013, 11:42:34 pm by Rapunzel »
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Atomic Cow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,221
  • Gender: Male
  • High Yield Minion
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2013, 11:48:47 pm »
Now we know which Republicans need to be primaried out of office.
"...And these atomic bombs which science burst upon the world that night were strange, even to the men who used them."  H. G. Wells, The World Set Free, 1914

"The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying elections." -Lord Acton

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2013, 11:50:59 pm »
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/193003-senate-democratic-leader-unsure-gop-votes-are-there-to-pass-budget-deal

Durbin: We need GOP votes for deal

By Alexander Bolton - 12/12/13 04:42 PM EST

The Senate Democratic leadership is not sure there are enough votes to pass a year-end budget deal next week.

Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) cautioned Thursday that Democrats are not assured of winning over enough Republican votes to pass a budget deal to avoid a government shutdown.

ADVERTISEMENT
The top three Senate Republican leaders have signaled they will vote against the deal, which would reduce the automatic cuts known as sequestration by $63 billion.

Senior GOP lawmakers and aides say the agreement negotiated between Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) busts budget caps set in 2011.

“We need Republican votes to pass the budget agreement. Period. We need at least five,” said Durbin, the second-ranking Senate Democratic leader.

“I’m not sure of anything,” he added. “There are not five Republicans who have announced they’re for it.”

The bill is expected to pass the House on Thursday despite the strong opposition of conservative groups, which have skewered it for lifting budget caps for 2014 and 2015 in exchange for deficit-reducing actions spread over the next decade.

A strong House vote could spur Republican senators to embrace the deal. One GOP aide said that some lawmakers were holding off on stating their positions as a courtesy to Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio).

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), a centrist who often works with Democrats, said she was undecided.

“There are a whole bunch of things,” Murkowski said, citing her concerns. “You got federal employees in there. You got military retirement pay. You got [the Strategic Petroleum Reserve].”

The Murray-Ryan deal would rescind available funds in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and repeal the federal government’s ability to accept oil through the royalty-in-kind program.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who initially signaled he would vote for the legislation, said Thursday morning he is now undecided because of proposed pension cuts for working-age military retirees.

“I’m having our folks look at it right so you’ll have to put me down as undecided because I’m very concerned about that,” he said.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who is up for reelection next year and worked with McCain to find ways to reduce cuts slated for military programs, said he would vote "no" because of the military retiree issue.

Democratic leaders will need more than five GOP votes if they suffer defections within their own caucus. Liberal Sens. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Bernie Sanders (Vt.), an independent who caucuses with Democrats, say they are undecided because the agreement does not include emergency unemployment benefits.

Sen. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.) and Orrin Hatch (Utah), two other Republicans with pragmatic streaks, also said they are undecided about how to vote.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (Ala.), the ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, who plans to vote against the agreement, said Republicans will wage a filibuster against it.

He said the GOP would force Democrats to secure 60 votes at least twice to waive budgetary objections and end dilatory debate.

“They’ll need 60 votes on cloture and 60 votes on the budget point of order,” Sessions said.

But Republicans do not expect to wage a lengthy talking filibuster, such as Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) did earlier this year to protest the Obama administration’s drone policy.

“Really, the purpose of extending debate on an issue is so that people will become more aware and calling attention to it,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said. “I think there will be awareness of this issue and as a result it probably won’t be necessary to do something like that.”

Sens. Ted Cruz (Texas) and Mike Lee (Utah), two Tea-Party Republicans who led the fight against the government funding measure in October, declined to say if they use a lengthy floor debate to slow Murray-Ryan pact.

Cruz issued a critical statement Thursday afternoon.

“The new budget deal moves in the wrong direction: it spends more, taxes more, and allows continued funding for ObamaCare. I cannot support it,” he said.   
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline sinkspur

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28,567
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2013, 12:18:10 am »
Now we know which Republicans need to be primaried out of office.

Yes.  Shoot anybody who disagrees with you.

You realize, of course, that most members are in safe districts and invulnerable to any primary challenge.  But, Jim DeMint at Heritage and Matt Hoskins at SCF want you to throw your money at them so they can make  you think there's a real chance these guys will be voted out.

Only 69 members were cowed by FreedomWorks.  That's far fewer than anyone anticipated.  At some point, even these guys will get tired of the fighting and actually work to get some things done.
Roy Moore's "spiritual warfare" is driving past a junior high without stopping.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2013, 12:52:54 am »
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2013/roll640.xml

Ayes

Aderholt
Amodei
Andrews
Bachus
Barber
Barletta
Barr
Barrow (GA)
Beatty
Becerra
Benishek
Bera (CA)
Bilirakis
Bishop (NY)
Bishop (UT)
Black
Blackburn
Blumenauer
Boehner
Bonamici
Boustany
Brady (PA)
Brady (TX)
Braley (IA)
Brooks (IN)
Brownley (CA)
Buchanan
Bucshon
Bustos
Butterfield
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Cantor
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Cárdenas
Carney
Carson (IN)
Carter
Cartwright
Cassidy
Castor (FL)
Chaffetz
Clark (MA)
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Coble
Cohen
Cole
Collins (GA)
Collins (NY)
Conaway
Connolly
Cook
Cooper
Costa
Courtney
Cramer
Crenshaw
Crowley
Cuellar
Culberson
Cummings
Davis (CA)
Davis, Rodney
DeGette
Delaney
DelBene
Denham
Dent
Deutch
Diaz-Balart
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Duckworth
Duffy
Edwards
Ellmers
Engel
Enyart
Eshoo
Esty
Farenthold
Farr
Fattah
Fincher
Fitzpatrick
Fleischmann
Fleming
Flores
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foster
Foxx
Frelinghuysen
Gabbard
Gallego
Garamendi
Garcia
Gerlach
Gibbs
Gibson
Goodlatte
Granger
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Griffin (AR)
Griffith (VA)
Grimm
Guthrie
Gutiérrez
Hahn
Hanna
Harper
Hartzler
Hastings (FL)
Hastings (WA)
Heck (WA)
Hensarling
Herrera Beutler
Higgins
Himes
Hinojosa
Honda
Horsford
Hudson
Huffman
Huizenga (MI)
Hultgren
Hunter
Hurt
Israel
Issa
Jackson Lee
Jeffries
Jenkins
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (OH)
Johnson, E. B.
Joyce
Kaptur
Keating
Kelly (IL)
Kelly (PA)
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilmer
Kind
King (NY)
Kinzinger (IL)
Kirkpatrick
Kline
Kuster
LaMalfa
Lamborn
Lance
Langevin
Lankford
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Latham
Latta
Lewis
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Loebsack
Lofgren
Lowenthal
Lowey
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lujan Grisham (NM)
Luján, Ben Ray (NM)
Lynch
Maffei
Maloney, Carolyn
Maloney, Sean
Marino
Matheson
Matsui
McAllister
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McHenry
McKeon
McMorris Rodgers
McNerney
Meehan
Meeks
Meng
Messer
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Miller, George
Moore
Moran
Murphy (FL)
Murphy (PA)
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal
Noem
Nolan
Nunes
Nunnelee
O'Rourke
Owens
Palazzo
Pascrell
   Pastor (AZ)
Paulsen
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Perry
Peters (CA)
Peters (MI)
Peterson
Petri
Pittenger
Pitts
Polis
Price (GA)
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reed
Reichert
Renacci
Ribble
Rice (SC)
Rigell
Roby
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rokita
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Rothfus
Roybal-Allard
Royce
Ruiz
Runyan
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Ryan (WI)
Sarbanes
Schiff
Schneider
Schock
Schwartz
Scott (VA)
Scott, Austin
Scott, David
Sensenbrenner
Serrano
Sessions
Sewell (AL)
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Sinema
Sires
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Southerland
Speier
Stewart
Stivers
Stutzman
Swalwell (CA)
Takano
Terry
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiberi
Tierney
Tipton
Titus
Tonko
Tsongas
Turner
Upton
Valadao
Van Hollen
Vargas
Veasey
Vela
Wagner
Walberg
Walden
Walorski
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waxman
Welch
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Williams
Wilson (FL)
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Womack
Woodall
Yarmuth
Yoder
Yoho
Young (AK)
Young (IN)

Noes

Amash
Bachmann
Barton
Bass
Bentivolio
Bridenstine
Brooks (AL)
Broun (GA)
Burgess
Chabot
Chu
Cicilline
Clarke (NY)
Coffman
Conyers
Cotton
Crawford
Daines
DeFazio
DeLauro
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Ellison
Frankel (FL)
Franks (AZ)
Fudge
Gardner
Garrett
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Gosar
Gowdy
Grijalva
Hall
Hanabusa
Harris
Heck (NV)
Holding
Holt
Hoyer
Huelskamp
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan
King (IA)
Kingston
Labrador
Lee (CA)
Levin
Long
Lummis
Marchant
Massie
McClintock
McIntyre
McKinley
Meadows
Mullin
Mulvaney
Negrete McLeod
Neugebauer
Nugent
Olson
Pallone
Pearce
Pingree (ME)
Pocan
Poe (TX)
Pompeo
Posey
Richmond
Rohrabacher
Salmon
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sanford
Scalise
Schakowsky
Schrader
Schweikert
Slaughter
Smith (MO)
Smith (NE)
Stockman
Thompson (MS)
Velázquez
Visclosky
Waters
Watt
Weber (TX)
Webster (FL)
Wenstrup


Not Voting

Bishop (GA)
Brown (FL)
Castro (TX)
Davis, Danny
McCarthy (NY)
Radel
Rush
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #6 on: December 13, 2013, 12:53:22 am »
My current and former (new district) congressmen voted NO!!!!!
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Online rustynail

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,081
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #7 on: December 13, 2013, 01:05:00 am »
So they fund Obamakare in able to use it against the democrats later?
John Boehner 3d chess savant.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 71,613
  • Gender: Female
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #8 on: December 13, 2013, 02:03:52 am »
So they fund Obamakare in able to use it against the democrats later?
John Boehner 3d chess savant.

Yep and cannot defund it in 2014
�The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.� G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Cincinnatus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,513
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2013, 02:12:28 am »
Wow, Rapunzel, you got that vote up fast. Thanks for that. I note the guy from my district voted for it but of the names who voted "no", I see some very good people.

One other thing about this vote. Recall how Boehner was whining,
Quote
"You mean the groups that came out and opposed it before they ever saw it?" a visibly angry Boehner told reporters Wednesday, his tone rising. "They're using our members and they're using the American people for their own goals. This is ridiculous."
[emphasis added]

But, John, Ryan and Mophead only reached an agreement on this budget two days ago, so, John, are you telling us the members of the House were able to familiarize themselves with all the details of a $1.012 trillion budget that is covering both 2014 & 2015? Or did they just support it before seeing it because the House leadership used them for their own goals?
We shall never be abandoned by Heaven while we act worthy of its aid ~~ Samuel Adams

Offline SouthTexas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,665
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2013, 02:17:33 am »

Offline Atomic Cow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,221
  • Gender: Male
  • High Yield Minion
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2013, 02:23:52 am »
My idiot Congresscritter did as well, using the excuse "it's for the troops."  He already got a nasty e-mail from me and has lost my support and vote.  After backing the NSA, he had one more chance and just blew it.
"...And these atomic bombs which science burst upon the world that night were strange, even to the men who used them."  H. G. Wells, The World Set Free, 1914

"The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying elections." -Lord Acton

Offline happyg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,820
  • Gender: Female
Re: HOUSE APPROVES BIPARTISAN BUDGET DEAL
« Reply #12 on: December 13, 2013, 02:30:51 am »
My current and former (new district) congressmen voted NO!!!!!

Rep. Jim Jordan voted NO, too!