Author Topic: The new Paul Ryan  (Read 325 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 248,510
The new Paul Ryan
« on: December 11, 2013, 02:32:05 PM »
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=AB0D5F26-9236-4790-9EDF-2AFBD99C8C3D

 The new Paul Ryan
By: Jake Sherman
December 10, 2013 09:54 PM EST

The new Paul Ryan emerged this week.

The House Budget Committee chairman, who has spent years penning budgets fit for conservatives’ dreams, has morphed into a man willing to take modest steps.

The two-year budget agreement he rolled out with Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) Tuesday evening is striking for its simplicity: It cuts the deficits by $23 billion, sets new higher spending levels for the next two years and replaces automatic spending cuts set to take effect in 2014.

But in abandoning his years-long quest to re-imagine American society and settling for a bipartisan deal, the Wisconsin Republican took the first steps to emerge as a House power center — a Republican willing to take baby steps to curb the nation’s trillions in debt, normalize the budget process and protect a Pentagon pilloried by cuts.



If the budget passes, it sets up a helpful message for Ryan as he considers both his future in the House and the 2016 presidential race: He can claim he is as a man in tune with the realities of governing. Sure, he is a conservative, but Ryan is willing dispense with the perfect in favor of the good.

As he unveiled this agreement Tuesday night in the Senate’s television studio, he made sure to mention that this is the first “divided government budget agreement since 1986.”

“As a conservative, I deal with the situation as it exists,” Ryan said. “I deal with the way things are, not necessarily the way things I want them to be. I’ve passed three budgets in a row that reflect my priorities and my principles and everything I wanted to accomplish. We’re in divided government. I realize I’m not going to get that. So I’m not going to go a mile in the direction I wanted to go to, but I will take a few steps in the right direction. This agreement takes us in the right direction, from my perspective, for the very reasons I laid out before.”



A vote is expected later this week, before the House recesses for the remainder of 2013. Ryan predicted healthy support for the plan in the House, while Murray appeared confident the bill would pass the Senate and President Barack Obama praised the outlines of the agreement. Still, it will be a tough sell with conservatives, a fact that lays bare Ryan’s immediate challenge.

His task is to convince enough of the 231 members of the House Republican Conference Wednesday morning that they should follow him in taking a “step in the right direction” — a tough message for a group of people who shut down the government to defund the president’s signature legislative achievement.

Ryan and the Republican leadership are hoping their party ignores the loud voices of the outside groups, which panned the deal before it was even announced. This, Ryan is trying to impress upon his colleagues, is what it looks like to be a conservative. By voting for this bill, Republicans will avoid another government shutdown and achieve real spending reductions. The bill, Ryan said Tuesday, cuts the deficit by $23 billion — savings he fought for vociferously behind closed doors.



“This says let’s cut spending in a smarter way, some permanent spending cuts to pay for some temporary sequester relief, resulting in net deficit reduction without raising taxes,” Ryan told reporters Tuesday night. “That’s fiscal responsibility. That’s fiscal conservatism. And it adds a greater stability to the situation. It prevents government shutdowns, which we don’t think is anyone’s interest. That to me is the right thing to do, and that is a conservative looking at the situation as it is, making it better.”

Of course, there will be Republicans who oppose this deal. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), whom Ryan might run into in Des Moines in 2015, is against the agreement. Conservatives like Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.) have panned the deal on Twitter.

“Americans don’t want another bipartisan deal…they want a solution to the #overspending,” Huelskamp wrote.

But those hard-line elements might find themselves further isolated, as Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and many of Washington’s top lawmakers offered their quick support for the agreement.

Still, Ryan might find his name on an agreement that several dozens of House Republicans vote against. The bill raises revenue — which some conservatives call tax increases — and increases overall spending. It hardly touches the problems Republicans have spent years trying to fix, such as major changes to social safety net programs and a rewriting of the Tax Code.

And this agreement is far from all-encompassing. Ryan and Murray’s pact doesn’t increase the debt limit — lawmakers are saving that battle for 2014 – and leaves aside an extension of federal unemployment benefits.

All of that could hurt Ryan on the right but help him establish his credentials as someone who can work in Washington — not just talk about conservative solutions that won’t be implemented.

And it ditches the Ryan of yesteryear and helps sketch the outlines of Ryan the deal-cutter.

“The House budget reflects our ultimate goals,” Ryan said, talking about his spending blueprints of previous years. “It balanced the budget within 10 years, it pays off the debt, but I realize that that is not going to pass in this divided government. I see this agreement as a step in the right direction. In divided government, you don’t always get what you want. That said, we still can make progress toward our goals.”

Support the USO

Offline katzenjammer

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,513
Re: The new Paul Ryan
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2013, 02:54:30 PM »
Quote
The two-year budget agreement he rolled out with Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) Tuesday evening is striking for its simplicity: It cuts the deficits by $23 billion, sets new higher spending levels for the next two years and replaces automatic spending cuts set to take effect in 2014.

Fan-freakin'-tastic!!!

Color me less than impressed!!

So, a whopping $23 billion!!!   Wow, that $23 billion is all of 00.64% of 2014 projected spending of $2.3 Trillion, and an even more impressive 00.39% of 2023's projected $5.8 Trillion.  Something tells me we need to be using a bigger spoon to bail out the ocean.....  lol

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
Re: The new Paul Ryan
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2013, 03:10:53 PM »
Fan-freakin'-tastic!!!

Color me less than impressed!!

So, a whopping $23 billion!!!   Wow, that $23 billion is all of 00.64% of 2014 projected spending of $2.3 Trillion, and an even more impressive 00.39% of 2023's projected $5.8 Trillion.  Something tells me we need to be using a bigger spoon to bail out the ocean.....  lol


Yep it's a freaking joke.  The government wastes more than this on pure crapola.. but we're supposedly to be impressed....   :silly: :silly: :silly: :silly:
“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776

Online truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 16,440
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
Re: The new Paul Ryan
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2013, 04:17:06 PM »
Ryan could negotiate from a stronger position, if the GOP had more members in the Senate.

I'd be mighty impressed if some prominent "true conservatives" publicly stated they were going to focus MORE on defeating democrats, and LESS on replacing republicans.
 

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
Re: The new Paul Ryan
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2013, 05:03:05 PM »

I'd be mighty impressed if some prominent "true conservatives" publicly stated they were going to focus MORE on defeating democrats, and LESS on replacing republicans.

The lock-step brown shirt party is called the Democrat Party... in the GOP with a "big tent" we have vigorous debate... and - frankly - people like McCain, McConnell, Graham, Alexander need to be replaced - been there too long and their expiration date has come and gone... if they refuse to step aside then by all means primary them out.
“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,570
Re: The new Paul Ryan
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2013, 09:46:43 PM »
Article title:
[[ The new Paul Ryan ]]

Meet the new milquetoast Republican.

Just like the old milquetoast Republicans....


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf