Author Topic: Obama: Iran needs to keep nuclear program for its dignity  (Read 286 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,465
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Obama: Iran needs to keep nuclear program for its dignity
« on: December 08, 2013, 04:40:12 AM »
Obama: Iran Needs to Keep Nuclear Program for its “Dignity”

Posted By Daniel Greenfield On December 7, 2013 @ 7:43 pm In The Point | 9 Comments




Oddly enough Obama didn’t go around explaining that when he meant that an Iranian nuclear program was unacceptable, what he actually meant was that uranium enrichment was completely acceptable… before he actually made that disastrous deal.


Alluding to the view of Netanyahu and a number of lawmakers in Congress, Obama said, “what this comes up down to is the perception that if we kept churning up the pressure, new sanctions, more sanctions, more military threats etc, that eventually Iran would cave.”

Instead, Obama said, that would likely drive away allies who have helped keep up the pressure on Iran through U.S.-led sanctions.

So those sanctions don’t work, except when they do work. They work at getting a meaningless agreement through. But not a meaningful one. Is there anything sanctions can’t do? Just ask Kim Jong Il and Bill Clinton.


Obama outlined U.S. red lines in a final agreement, including the dismantling of the plutonium reactor at Arak and the underground nuclear reactor at Fordow, as well as advanced centrifuges.

These would be the new red lines. Which everyone takes seriously. Because look at how he stuck to his red lines on Syria. And Iran.


Demanding no enrichment, Obama said, was unrealistic, likening it to his believing Congress would pass every one of his legislative initiatives.

The Iranians needed to come to a deal that would afford them some “dignity,” he said, and alluded to broad popular support for some enrichment capacity.

What exactly does dignity have to do with a nuclear weapons program? This is a straightforward problem. Iran is a terrorist regime and its nuclear program is weapons oriented. Either that program gets stopped or we’re looking at a countdown to terrorists getting their hands on nukes.

But stopping the program would damage Iran’s dignity.


Obama twice said that he would reassert the military option should talks fail with Iran. “I’ve made clear I can avail myself of including a military option, is one we can consider and prepare for,” he said.

And then everyone laughed and laughed.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://www.frontpagemag.com

URL to article: http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-iran-needs-to-keep-nuclear-program-for-its-dignity/
There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics. There must be a positive passion for the public good, the public interest, honour, power and glory, established in the minds of the people, or there can be no republican government, nor any real liberty: and this public passion must be superior to all private passions. John Adams

Offline xfreeper

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,546
Re: Obama: Iran needs to keep nuclear program for its dignity
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2013, 07:27:29 AM »
And then everyone laughed and laughed.

won't be laughing long I'm afraid


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf