Author Topic: Obamacare won't cover babies  (Read 809 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Obamacare won't cover babies
« on: December 05, 2013, 10:13:42 am »


ObamaCare won’t cover babies!


    

sick babiesSay it ain’t so, but there is another “gotcha” in ObamaCare.

It appears that ObamaCare doesn’t cover babies under two years old.


“I gave you the chance to kill the little burden, now didn’t I?” – ObamaCare

ObamaCare has run the numbers, and guess what…little people can cost as much as old people. Yes, especially with all the potential crackhead mothers who might want to take a stab at child neglect.

Reported by the NY Post:


When Kelly called a representative, he was told his daughter had to be 2 before she could be covered under a family plan. He would have to buy a separate plan for her, at monthly premiums that ranged between $117.21 and $369.31. The cost would be on top of a family plan with premiums ranging from $810.84 to $2,554.71 a month.

ObamaCare knows what those mean insurance companies know: Kids cost more…a LOT more!

According to a report from the Health Care Cost Institute, cited in Medical News Today:


In 2010, per capita spending on children’s health care increased to $2,123, which is an 18.6% increase from 2007, with spending on health care for infants and toddlers being noted as disproportionately high. Even though children below the age of 3 made up 17% of the covered child population, they cost the government 31.4% of the total amount for children’s health care, with a per capita spending reaching $3,896 in 2010.

Death panels, no coverage for tots, and a government-run program that can arbitrarily change the rules. Sure, that’s just what Americans wanted in health care.

Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2013/12/obamacare-wont-cover-babies/#tvWw3cWvQaSsyGFD.99

Offline musiclady

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,682
Re: Obamacare won't cover babies
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2013, 12:49:38 pm »
Completely consistent with the radical left's complete disregard for life.

They are diabolical.

Literally..............
Character still matters.  It always matters.

I wear a mask as an exercise in liberty and love for others.  To see it as an infringement of liberty is to entirely miss the point.  Be kind.

"Sometimes I think the Church would be better off if we would call a moratorium on activity for about six weeks and just wait on God to see what He is waiting to do for us. That's what they did before Pentecost."   - A. W. Tozer

Use the time God is giving us to seek His will and feel His presence.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Re: Obamacare won't cover babies
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2013, 01:56:55 pm »
Completely consistent with the radical left's complete disregard for life.

They are diabolical.

Literally..............

It is also consistent with Britain where people are pushing for being able to "abort" babies up to two years of age.

Offline happyg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11,820
  • Gender: Female
Re: Obamacare won't cover babies
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2013, 02:21:33 pm »
It is so obvious that Obamacare is not about healthcare, but total takeover of American lives. Republicans must know this, too, but don't have the guts to come out fighting.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Re: Obamacare won't cover babies
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2013, 02:42:13 pm »
MSNBC (Maddow) is attempting to make up the excuse that this was a paperwork error on the parent's part. Considering her track record, she probably pulled that story out of her a.......

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/another-aca-horror-story-fades-away