Author Topic: Boeing May Partly Move Production Out of Washington State Following Union Vote  (Read 589 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SPQR

  • Guest
Boeing may move portions of its airplane construction out of Washington after a local union rejected a contract offer that would have saved the company $8 billion.

A company spokesman told the Washington Free Beacon that the company had no choice but to consider moving construction of some of its largest planes out of the Evergreen State after International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local 751 rejected changes to wage and retirement plans.

“Since the union rejected the offer, we were forced to pursue all options for locating the 777X,” Boeing spokesman Doug Alder Jr. said. “That process is actively underway, although we are not disclosing which locations we are considering.”

Alder emphasized in a follow-up with the Washington Free Beacon that the company has not yet ruled out Puget Sound.

“We are now in a competitive process that will take many things into account,” he said.

Talks fell apart after the union balked at the company’s offer to increase retirement contributions by $2,400 per year on the condition that employees accept 401(k)-style plans, rather than the traditional retirement package. Union members currently receive defined benefit plans, which guarantee recipients a percentage of their salary after retirement.

The union’s contract does not expire until 2016, but the company called it to the negotiating table in order to shore up 20,000 jobs, as well as future manufacturing operations of the 777X, which has been produced in Washington for two decades.

The rejection earned them praise from far-left labor supporters, including newly elected Socialist Seattle City Councilwoman Kshama Sawant.

“The only response we can have if Boeing executives do not agree to keep the plant here is for the machinists to say the machines are here, the workers are here, we will do the job, we don’t need the executives,” Sawant said at a Monday rally.

Other local labor leaders praised the decision. Jeffrey Johnson, president of the AFL-CIO affiliated Washington State Labor Council, said that it was “no surprise to us that the proposal was overwhelmingly rejected,” in a Seattle Times editorial.

“We could not be prouder of the Machinists at District Lodge 751. By turning down Boeing’s lopsided proposal, the Machinists stood up to defend the middle class,” he wrote.

However, the union’s national leaders, who called on the Washington chapter to take the deal, supported the “lopsided” proposal that they negotiated.

“One of the main things is the international negotiated it behind the local’s (and its members backs), … did a lousy job in selling it and tried to shove it down their throats,” one labor insider told the Washington Free Beacon. “It was an F-You vote against the union as much as it was against the company.”

Alder said that the company does not plan on returning to the negotiating table for at least two years.

“We have no plans to re-engage the union on contract talks until 2016,” he said.

Employees won’t be the only ones paying for union obstinance. The Seattle Times reports that the state of Washington could see its credit rating downgraded over the loss of jobs.

The union did not respond to request for comment.

This is not the first time the aero-tech giant has withdrawn operations from Washington over labor disputes. In 2011, it decided to relocate construction operations of the 787 Dreamliner plane to right to work South Carolina after the union failed to agree to a temporary no-strike clause. The National Labor Relations Board attempted to punish the move, but backed away after Boeing agreed to build the 737 MAX in Washington.

Alder said the 737 MAX will remain in Washington, despite the union setback.

“Plans are already well underway in our Renton factory for introducing the 737 MAX into production,” he said.

The company plans on selecting a location for the 777X within three months

http://freebeacon.com/boeing-to-partly-move-production-out-of-washington-state-following-union-vote/

SPQR

  • Guest
This is a big deal. Boeing has been in Washington State for almost a century. This would be a big problem for local economies that depend on Boeing. The unions should be ashamed of themselves.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2013, 03:44:04 AM by SPQR »

Offline happyg

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,822
Unions are socialists. They have no shame.

SPQR

  • Guest
Unions are socialists. They have no shame.

I agree.

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
This is a big deal. Boeing has been in Washington State for almost a century. This would be a big problem for local economies that depend on Boeing. The unions should be ashamed of themselves.

This has been coming for decades.  Wages have gotten so high that Boeing has a difficult time competing with Airbus.  At one time a Boeing worker and his family actually lived in a house near the plant and the local economy thrived.  But real estate prices are so high that virtually everyone who works at Boeing lives in a distant suburb and commutes in to work.

If Boeing pulls the plug on the 777X and really does move production to South Carolina it will give the entire Puget Sound economy a gut punch, including a number of smaller towns that rely on those jobs to sustain them. 

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719
Sadly that may be what happens.  I read in Cadillac Desert how airplane manufacturers settled up there because the plentiful and cheap energy they got from the big dam on the Columbia River made it easier to make aluminium airplane skins to support the war effort.  In fact they pulled from the also under construction Shasta Dam to hurry and completed the Columbia River Dam....They have s long history up there and it looks like the unions in particular now think they can milk them dry.
“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline kevindavis

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,035
Sadly that may be what happens.  I read in Cadillac Desert how airplane manufacturers settled up there because the plentiful and cheap energy they got from the big dam on the Columbia River made it easier to make aluminium airplane skins to support the war effort.  In fact they pulled from the also under construction Shasta Dam to hurry and completed the Columbia River Dam....They have s long history up there and it looks like the unions in particular now think they can milk them dry.

The problem with the unions is that they still live in the past..
"Die-hard conservatives thought that if I couldn't get everything I asked for, I should jump off the cliff with the flag flying-go down in flames. No, if I can get 70 or 80 percent of what it is I'm trying to get ... I'll take that and then continue to try to get the rest in the future."

Ronald Reagan

"We must continue to go into space for humanity.” - Dr. Stephen Hawking

Offline Atomic Cow

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,235
  • High Yield Minion
This has been coming for decades.  Wages have gotten so high that Boeing has a difficult time competing with Airbus.  At one time a Boeing worker and his family actually lived in a house near the plant and the local economy thrived.  But real estate prices are so high that virtually everyone who works at Boeing lives in a distant suburb and commutes in to work.

If Boeing pulls the plug on the 777X and really does move production to South Carolina it will give the entire Puget Sound economy a gut punch, including a number of smaller towns that rely on those jobs to sustain them.

Don't forget that Airbus has a basically unlimited supply of money to draw from, the EU.  Boeing has always been in an unfavorable advantage with the "loans" that Airbus gets from the EU, and are then conveniently written off.
"...And these atomic bombs which science burst upon the world that night were strange, even to the men who used them."  H. G. Wells, The World Set Free, 1914

"The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying elections." -Lord Acton

Offline Cincinnatus

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,514
Workers Unite!

Seize the Washington plant!!

And completely destroy your jobs.

We shall never be abandoned by Heaven while we act worthy of its aid ~~ Samuel Adams


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf