Author Topic: Married couple at disadvantage under ObamaCare  (Read 361 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,207
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
Married couple at disadvantage under ObamaCare
« on: November 22, 2013, 06:38:29 AM »
Married couples at disadvantage under ObamaCare
 
Posted on November 22, 2013 by Cowboy Byte   
   

Who exactly is at an advantage with obamacare?
 Check this out:

Couples enrolling in ObamaCare now face a de facto marriage penalty, with the law making it much harder for those who are married to qualify for subsidies.

According to the conservative Heritage Foundation, married couples could pay as much as $10,000 more per year than their unmarried counterparts, due to the way subsidies are calculated.
   



The subsidies under the Affordable Care Act are based on income. The less you make, the more money you can get from the government to help pay for insurance.

An individual making above $45,960 would not qualify. For a married couple, the income cut-off is $62,040.
 
These rules, then, create a disconnect in how non-married and married couples are treated.

   
   Continue Reading on www.foxnews.com     

Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/26239/married-couples-disadvantage-obamacare/#VubxcZ31d2p2GsjG.99
There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics. There must be a positive passion for the public good, the public interest, honour, power and glory, established in the minds of the people, or there can be no republican government, nor any real liberty: and this public passion must be superior to all private passions. John Adams


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf