Author Topic:  (Read 519 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 258,931
« on: November 18, 2013, 09:41:11 PM »

Support the USO

Offline Chieftain

  • AMF, YOYO
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,633
  • Your what hurts??
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2013, 09:53:16 PM »
This is outright fraud and professional misconduct writ large.  I mean, this is third-world, banana republic stuff.

And it fits into the Obama reelection meme: "Reelection at any cost."


Offline mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 258,931
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2013, 09:56:48 PM »
This is outright fraud and professional misconduct writ large.  I mean, this is third-world, banana republic stuff.

And it fits into the Obama reelection meme: "Reelection at any cost."

They had their claws into every agency/branch of government...they all seemed to lie for him....it just sickens me.

Support the USO

Offline truth_seeker

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 19,976
  • Common Sense Results Oriented Conservative Veteran
    • The place where argument addicts can go
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2013, 10:00:10 PM »
You might want to hold some scepticism regarding government data, in general. Start with inflation, budgets, military successes and failures, foreclosures, repayments of Stimulus, crime statistics, etc.

Ask yourself if the people Obama surrounds himself with are honest? Are they above falsifying data? Would Holder pursue fraud?

"God must love the common man, he made so many of them.�  Abe Lincoln

Offline happyg

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,822
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2013, 10:51:07 PM »

Offline mountaineer

  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 36,857
« Reply #5 on: November 19, 2013, 08:25:02 AM »
Business Insider notes that "filling in"  data also happened in 2010.
A day without sunshine is like, you know, night.

Offline mountaineer

  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 36,857
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2013, 08:26:58 AM »
Thomas Lifson at American Thinker blog comments:
Quote
... The real question is whether the faked interviews were skewed toward reporting jobs held. One can imagine that if there was pressure to fake the interviews, then there was also pressure to make them report more employment. But this is impossible to know without putting people under oath.

Clearly a Congressional investigation is merited.

On President Obama's watch, we have seen fraud employed to influence the 2012 election regarding Obamacare, so it is not much of a stretch to believe that unemployment data also was faked to influecn e the election. This raises questions about the legitimacy of his victory.
A day without sunshine is like, you know, night.


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf