Author Topic: NY Times: We have "high threshold" for lies  (Read 420 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 57,187
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
NY Times: We have "high threshold" for lies
« on: November 07, 2013, 08:28:35 AM »
NY Times: We Have ‘High Threshold’ for Lies


by Larry O'Connor  5 Nov 2013 


The New York Times has an explanation for their characterization of President Obama's deceptive claim that "if you like your health insurance, you can keep your health insurance." It is not as a "lie," but merely that Obama "mis-spoke."

Times public editor Margaret Sullivan addressed the criticism on Monday: 


On Monday, I asked the editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, about the wording.

“We have a high threshold for whether someone lied,” he told me. The phrase that The Times used “means that he said something that wasn’t true.” Saying the president lied would have meant something different, Mr. Rosenthal said — that he knew it was false and intended to express the falsehood. “We don’t know that,” he said.

Contrary to what many readers and commenters are saying, The Times has frequently been tough on the president and his administration in recent months on subjects from press rights to surveillance to drones.

But “misspoke” does suggest a one-time slip of the tongue.

Wouldn’t it have been better, I asked Mr. Rosenthal, if the editorial had said that Mr. Obama’s statements “clearly weren’t true,” or that the president “was clearly wrong” when he repeatedly made those statements?

He responded that the editorial’s language was fine, but he also allowed, “We could have done that.”

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/11/05/NY-Times-High-Threshold-For-Lie
« Last Edit: November 07, 2013, 08:29:12 AM by rangerrebew »
There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
Public virtue cannot exist in a nation without private, and public virtue is the only foundation of republics. There must be a positive passion for the public good, the public interest, honour, power and glory, established in the minds of the people, or there can be no republican government, nor any real liberty: and this public passion must be superior to all private passions. John Adams

Offline andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,557
Re: NY Times: We have "high threshold" for lies
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2013, 09:09:14 AM »
In other words, according to the New York Times, the President unintentionally "misspoke".

30 times.
Liberalism isn't really about making the world a better place. It's about reassuring the elites that they are good people for wanting to rule over it.

Offline DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 30,614
Re: NY Times: We have "high threshold" for lies
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2013, 09:14:02 AM »
Where the hell is William Ayers now when we REALLY need him?    :whistle:
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"If you want to change the world, go home and love your family".    ...Mother Teresa

Offline musiclady

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 15,203
Re: NY Times: We have "high threshold" for lies
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2013, 11:23:30 AM »
They were pretty quick to use the word "lie" when they were referring to Bush's position on WMD (shared by the rest of the world), weren't they?

Nice that they've become so generous to President's now...........    **nononono*
Character still matters.  It always matters.

May 3, 2016 - the day the Republican party left ME.  I am now without a Party, and quite possibly without a country.  May God have mercy!


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf