Author Topic: NY Times: We have "high threshold" for lies  (Read 428 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 61,214
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
NY Times: We have "high threshold" for lies
« on: November 07, 2013, 08:28:35 AM »
NY Times: We Have ‘High Threshold’ for Lies


by Larry O'Connor  5 Nov 2013 


The New York Times has an explanation for their characterization of President Obama's deceptive claim that "if you like your health insurance, you can keep your health insurance." It is not as a "lie," but merely that Obama "mis-spoke."

Times public editor Margaret Sullivan addressed the criticism on Monday: 


On Monday, I asked the editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, about the wording.

“We have a high threshold for whether someone lied,” he told me. The phrase that The Times used “means that he said something that wasn’t true.” Saying the president lied would have meant something different, Mr. Rosenthal said — that he knew it was false and intended to express the falsehood. “We don’t know that,” he said.

Contrary to what many readers and commenters are saying, The Times has frequently been tough on the president and his administration in recent months on subjects from press rights to surveillance to drones.

But “misspoke” does suggest a one-time slip of the tongue.

Wouldn’t it have been better, I asked Mr. Rosenthal, if the editorial had said that Mr. Obama’s statements “clearly weren’t true,” or that the president “was clearly wrong” when he repeatedly made those statements?

He responded that the editorial’s language was fine, but he also allowed, “We could have done that.”

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/11/05/NY-Times-High-Threshold-For-Lie
« Last Edit: November 07, 2013, 08:29:12 AM by rangerrebew »
Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Offline andy58-in-nh

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,719
Re: NY Times: We have "high threshold" for lies
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2013, 09:09:14 AM »
In other words, according to the New York Times, the President unintentionally "misspoke".

30 times.
Liberalism isn't really about making the world a better place. It's about reassuring the elites that they are good people for wanting to rule over it.

Online DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 31,110
Re: NY Times: We have "high threshold" for lies
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2013, 09:14:02 AM »
Where the hell is William Ayers now when we REALLY need him?    :whistle:
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"I am responsible for what I say.  I am not responsible for what your understand."  ...me

Online musiclady

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 15,693
Re: NY Times: We have "high threshold" for lies
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2013, 11:23:30 AM »
They were pretty quick to use the word "lie" when they were referring to Bush's position on WMD (shared by the rest of the world), weren't they?

Nice that they've become so generous to President's now...........    **nononono*
Character still matters.  It always matters.

May 3, 2016 - the day the Republican party left ME.  I am now without a Party, and quite possibly without a country.  May God have mercy!


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf