Author Topic: Snohomish County pays for property, takes the money back, keeps the property  (Read 448 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cincinnatus

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,514
Leftist government thuggery at its finest. This is a local story to WA but in a larger sense is illustrative of how government, especially those dominated by Liberals, will misuse power.

By way of background: Snohomish County is adjacent to the Puget Sound, is just north of Seattle (King County), and is growing rapidly due to its location and beauty, especially as one moves east into rural areas. In both 2008 and 2012 it voted heavily for Obama (just south of 60%).

Kay Kohler inherited her Snohomish County family farm, which had been in her family since the 1930s. These four and a half acres remained largely undeveloped. Over the years, the area  built up as Snohomish County’s population grew. Neighborhoods and apartment complexes eventually surrounded Kohler’s family farm. Kay Kohler’s family attempted to get permits to locate an animal shelter or other developments on the property, but Snohomish County always turned them down.

In late 2008, Snohomish County approached Kay Kohler because they wanted to expand the road next to her property. They needed to use some of her land for the road expansion and other utility requirements like a retaining pond.  In 2008, the Snohomish County Assessor valued Kay Kohler’s property at $718,000 (Snohomish County Assessor valuation linked Download file Kohler Docs1 ). After using three independent appraisers to value the property, Snohomish County determined a valuation of $404,000 and offered to pay Kay Kohler that amount  if she signed a “Possession and Use” agreement (linked Download file Kohler Docs2 ). She agreed and received the payment. Although the specific contract Kay Kohler signed was a bit odd, her situation was unremarkable up until that point.

Almost every local government in Washington State has used eminent domain at some time, and there are commonly accepted practices for using eminent domain when expanding roads and making other infrastructure improvements.

However, Kay Kohler’s situation took a strange turn when Snohomish County decided they wanted most of their money back, claiming  they had overpaid for the property (despite their independent appraisals and the appraisal by the Snohomish County Assessor’s office). Yet they still wanted to take Kay Kohler’s land.

Even worse, they sued Kay Kohler  and got a judgment against her requiring her to return the money they had paid for her property. Kay Kohler lost her appeal, and Snohomish County has since bulldozed much of her land, installed a huge storm water retention pond on her property, and diverted much of the local storm water onto the property. Meanwhile, Kohler  lost her property and the money she received for it. Due to the legal costs of trying to defend herself, she has nothing left but a lien and judgment against her.

Unfortunately, Kay Kohler may not be alone in experiencing this type of situation. We have seen other local governments in Washington State use these “Possession and Use” agreements. We do not yet know the extent to which local governments use these agreements  as a “bait and switch” tactic  to acquire property through eminent domain at a lower cost. However, we strongly urge property owners  not to sign these types of agreements with local government – at all. In addition, we strongly recommend that no property owner sign ANY agreement with a local government without having a qualified attorney carefully review that agreement. Kay Kohler’s case demonstrates that property owners can’t trust government to be honest on their own.[/quote] [emphasis added and a sad, but true statement] [video interview of Ms Kohler]
We shall never be abandoned by Heaven while we act worthy of its aid ~~ Samuel Adams

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo