Author Topic: ‘Whatever’ are you babbling about, Kathleen Sebelius? By John Podhoretz  (Read 382 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 248,354
http://nypost.com/2013/10/31/whatever-are-you-babbling-about-kathleen-sebelius/

‘Whatever’ are you babbling about, Kathleen Sebelius?

By John Podhoretz

October 31, 2013 | 4:48am

For a moment Wednesday morning, the person in charge of ObamaCare — not to mention the largest and most expensive Cabinet department in the United States and, therefore, the world — turned into a frustrated teenager.

Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of Health and Human Services, was undergoing a grilling from a Republican congressman over whether President Obama bore responsibility for the failures of his health-care rollout. She said it was her fault. He said Obama was her boss and she reported to Obama, so wasn’t it his fault, too?

To which Sebelius responded thusly: “Um . . . You clearly . . . ­Uh . . . Whatever.”

It was like a line straight out of Tina Fey’s screenplay for the movie “Mean Girls.” You could almost see Sebelius, in her head, taking her thumb and forefinger and splaying them at 90-degree angles to make the “L” for “loser” sign at the congressman.

A few minutes earlier, she let drop that, by her calculations, the administration had spent $118 million on the HealthCare.gov Web site — you know, the one that isn’t working at all, the central tool in the federal government’s administration of its new health-care plan.

Another Republican asked her who was to blame for the waste of that $118 million — was it an official named Michelle Snyder? “Excuse me, congresswoman,” Sebelius replied. “Michelle Snyder is not responsible for the debacle. Hold me accountable for the debacle. I’m responsible.”

To which the obvious comeback ought to have been:

OK, you say you’re the official we must hold accountable for a debacle in which $118 million was basically set afire and burned into the air. That’s an ungodly amount of taxpayer money, Mrs. Sebelius. Why are you even testifying, ma’am? Why haven’t you resigned?

Resigning would not only be the honorable thing to do — it would be the only logical thing to do.

Logically, you simply can’t tell the world you’re to blame for the fact that $118 million of taxpayer money was entirely wasted and then continue on in your highfalutin job as though nothing bad had happened.

Maybe — maybe — you could argue you should stay just to help clean up the mess you had made and then surrender the job to someone else. But you can’t keep doing it — not after a disaster like that. Right?

For the record, until she spoke those words yesterday, I did not think Sebelius should resign. I don’t believe public servants in the midst of controversies should be viewed as useful political sacrifices to propitiate angry political gods.

But after she said that she was responsible and directly accountable for the wasting of $118 million, it is utterly dumbfounding that she can continue to serve as Health and Human Services secretary for one more moment.

>But in Barack Obama’s Washington, “taking responsibility” doesn’t mean what it means elsewhere.

When the officials who serve Obama say they are to be held accountable, what they actually mean is that they are willing to take the heat and absorb blame that might otherwise attach to the president himself.

By doing so, by serving as scapegoats and whipping dogs in the arena of public opinion, they demonstrate their fealty to him above all. And that fealty will be rewarded by loyalty in return.

When Hillary Clinton took responsibility for the killings of four Americans in Benghazi as she began to transition out of the administration, her departure became the occasion for a bizarre joint interview with Obama on “60 Minutes,” in which the president all but anointed her his successor.

Remember that, even as she was taking responsibility, Clinton notoriously yelled at a Senate hearing looking into circumstances that preceded the slaughter of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and others: “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

In the case of Sebelius, we’re told (by Matthew Cooper of National Journal, among others) that the president has given no thought to firing Sebelius, who was an early supporter of his in 2008 — and that he couldn’t do so anyway, because he’d have a devil of a time getting a replacement through a confirmation hearing.

Accountability. Responsibility.

What’s the diff.

Whatevs.

Support the USO

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 19,348
  • The income tax: Root of all evil!
    • The FairTax Plan
"If you like your current plan you can keep it period"

What part of that do they not understand!

And beyond that, What exactly qualifies them to tell ME what insurance coverages I must have?

« Last Edit: October 31, 2013, 10:15:02 AM by Bigun »
“It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.” —Voltaire

Offline flowers

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,579
So she did say that!  I really, really despise these people.

:peeonobama:


Online Lando Lincoln

  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11,532
"Uh... I accept full responsibility... but not the blame..."
For the progressive, there is very little to love about the United States. Washington, Jefferson, Madison? A bunch of rotten slaveholders, hypocrites, and cowards even when their hearts were in the right places. The Declaration of Independence? A manifesto for the propertied classes. The Constitution? An artifact of sexism and white supremacy. The sacrifices in the great wars of the 20th century? Feeding the poor and the disenfranchised into the meat-grinder of imperialism. The gifts of Carnegie, Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, Morgan, Astor? Blood money from self-aggrandizing robber barons. Nat Rev

Offline mountaineer

  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 33,998
Quote
OK, you say you’re the official we must hold accountable for a debacle in which $118 million was basically set afire and burned into the air. That’s an ungodly amount of taxpayer money, Mrs. Sebelius. Why are you even testifying, ma’am? Why haven’t you resigned?
The non-functioning website cost nearly five times that amount. So - times 5 - why hasn't she resigned? Oh, that's right, she doesn't work for us.
Just being unique doesn't make you useful.

Online Bigun

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 19,348
  • The income tax: Root of all evil!
    • The FairTax Plan
“It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.” —Voltaire

Offline xfreeper

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,546
Logically, you simply can’t tell the world you’re to blame for the fact that $118 million of taxpayer money was entirely wasted and then continue on in your highfalutin job as though nothing bad had happened.

Silly little boy. This is washington


Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo
Smf