Author Topic: Patriot Act's author wants to dismantle the NSA's phone and internet data collection  (Read 360 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rangerrebew

  • America defending Veteran
  • TBR Contributor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 65,750
  • “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them
The Patriot Act’s author wants to dismantle the NSA’s phone and internet data collection

Posted By Josh Peterson On 12:10 AM 10/10/2013 In Tech | No Comments

The author of the Patriot Act announced his latest plans to work to defund the NSA’s bulk collection of Americans’ phone and Internet records to an audience in Washington on Wednesday.

After months of gaining steam, the U.S. government shutdown appears to have stalled surveillance reform efforts on the Hill and in the executive branch.

On Wednesday, however, Wisconsin Republican Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner told an audience at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in D.C., that he planned to introduce new legislation to “end the bulk collection of American’s communications records by adopting a uniform standard for intelligence gathering under Section 215 of the Patriot Act.”

Sensenbrenner is the author of the Patriot Act.

The bill, called the Uniting and Strengthening America by Fulfilling Rights and Ending Eavesdropping and Online Monitoring (USAFREEDOM) Act,  would also tighten Section 702 of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

Section 215 of the Patriot Act, also known as the “business records” provision, and Section 702 of FISA, are used by the Executive Branch as the legal justification for the NSA’s bulk collection of the phone and Internet records of Americans.

His remarks — made to a room full of journalists, technologists, and policy and legal experts — were part of the final keynote address of the day.

“The Administration has proven beyond a reasonable doubt in my opinion that any standard can be abused, so it is also critical that we increase transparency,” said Sensenbrenner.

“We don’t need to have an Edward Snowden to let us know what’s going on there,” he said. “We need more transparency, and there’s a way to do it.”

Oregon Democrat Sen. Ron Wyden and Michigan Republican Rep. Justin Amash delivered their own remarks to the conference in separate keynote addresses earlier in the day.

Amash made waves of his own in July when his amendment to the defense appropriations bill that would have defunded the NSA’s mass surveillance programs was only narrowly defeated, surprising civil libertarians and defense hawks alike.

Sensenbrenner also supported the Amash amendment.

Follow Josh on Twitter and Facebook


Article printed from The Daily Caller:

URL to article:

Abraham Lincoln:

There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law.
--January 27, 1838 Lyceum Address

Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these
great and true principles.
--August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

Let us then turn this government back into the channel in which the framers of the Constitution originally placed it.
--July 10, 1858 Speech at Chicago

Offline mountaineer

  • Member
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 35,146
Yesterday, on behalf of our church's investment committee, I met with two fellows from the financial services company that manages our congregation's investments.  As a church member listed as an authorized signer on the accounts had left the church, we needed to name new signatories and the guys gave me the form to complete. They apologetically added that there's another form that each signer has to fill out. It is required by the Patriot Act   :patriot:  and if the brokerage doesn't have it on file, they'll get in big trouble from the feds.

To be an authorized signer of the church's account, no matter the amount, each of us must provide to the feds a social security number, birth date, phone numbers, mailing and legal addresses, marital status and number of dependents, driver's license number (and photocopies of both sides of the license), total net worth and liquid net worth, employer and annual income.

I'm sure we all can see how having this information will fight terrorism. When I reported this to the rest of the session last night, I suggested that the reason the feds need to know our net worths was so they'd know how much they'd be confiscating from us at a later date. One elder, who should be a signer, said there's no way he's giving up that info and therefore refused to be on the account. So it looks like our treasurer - a farmer - and I will be the authorized signers. Needless to say, we're going to be a little vague on those net worth numbers.
The only difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Democrats allow the poor to be corrupt, too.
--- Oscar Levant

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo