Author Topic: 'Elysium' 'Underperforms,' Can't Match 'District 9's' Opening Weekend  (Read 306 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rapunzel

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 71,719 'Elysium' 'Underperforms,' Can't Match 'District 9's' Opening Weekend

by Christian Toto 11 Aug 2013, 8:15 AM PDT

Director Neill Blomkamp's District 9 hauled in $37 million during its opening weekend four years ago, despite a no-name cast, tiny budget and zero brand awareness.

This weekend Blomkamp's pricey, star-filled follow-up couldn't even match that amount.

Elysium, a film most mainstream (read: left of center) film critics said had an overt socialist message, will be lucky to break the $30 million mark. dubbed that figure underwhelming, adding the movie only drew a "B" CinemaScore, a ranking based on audience's appreciation for the film.

The film stars Matt Damon and Jodie Foster, and Blomkamp's name is now synonymous with smart science fiction thanks to District 9's gritty storytelling. The movie offers a class warfare template peppered with overt calls for open immigration and universal health care.

Elysium is the summer's latest liberal film to either underwhelm or outright flop. White House Down, The East and, to a lesser extent, The Lone Ranger, all failed to live up to box office expectations.

Blomkamp's latest appears right on course, even if the director insists politics has nothing to do with his movie making.
“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves.” G Washington July 2, 1776

Offline Atomic Cow

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,236
  • High Yield Minion
The only reason it even did $30 million is because nothing else of consequence opened this weekend.  It almost lost to an idiot movie about drug running.
"...And these atomic bombs which science burst upon the world that night were strange, even to the men who used them."  H. G. Wells, The World Set Free, 1914

"The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying elections." -Lord Acton

Share me

Digg  Facebook  SlashDot  Delicious  Technorati  Twitter  Google  Yahoo