Author Topic: Lerner signed IRS cover letters to conservative groups demanding intrusive tax-exemption info — after she learned what was going on  (Read 6734 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Quote
Via Andrew Stiles, no wonder the IRS wants her out.

Now that she’s gone quiet, we can’t know what her defense would be to the ACLJ’s charges. But I can guess.

    We now know through her own testimony and from the Inspector General’s report that Lerner was briefed about this unlawful targeting scheme in June 2011. But nine months later, beginning in March 2012, she sent cover letters to many of our clients – demanding additional information and forwarding intrusive questionnaires. In fact, in March and April of 2012, Lerner sent 15 letters to 15 different clients (including those who were approved after lengthy delays and those who are still pending).

    This letter dated March 16, 2012 sent to the Ohio Liberty Council is representative of the other letters that Lerner sent to our clients. This letter, posted here, was sent on letterhead out of the IRS office in Cincinnati. The cover letter bears Lerner’s signature, who runs the Exempt Organizations division out of the Washington, DC office. It includes more invasive and improper questions about membership of the group and demands information about all public events conducted or planned for the future. And it specifically requested information about the organization’s website, Facebook page, and other social media outlets…

    In addition to the letter sent to the Ohio Liberty Council, our records indicate that Lerner sent 14 other letters to 14 of our clients in the March-April 2012 timeframe. It’s unclear why her name appears on letters to some organizations, and not others. But one thing is clear: this correspondence shows her direct involvement in the scheme. Further, sending a letter from the top person in the IRS Exempt Organizations division to a small Tea Party group also underscores the intimidation used in this targeting ploy.

According to the ACLJ, not only did tea-party groups continue to get intrusive requests after Lerner first found out about the targeting in June 2011, they continued to get requests after May 2012, when the IRS ostensibly changed the criteria for investigating 501(c)(4) groups to something more politically neutral. The latest letter cited by the ACLJ (but not signed by Lerner) was dated … May 6, 2013, just four days before Lerner’s orchestrated public mea culpa on behalf of the agency for targeting conservatives.

http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/24/lerner-signed-irs-cover-letters-to-conservative-groups-demanding-intrusive-tax-exemption-info-after-she-learned-what-was-going-on/

Oceander

  • Guest
I'm curious:  if Ms. Lerner was demanding such specific, detailed information about future events, did she then pass this information on to democrat/liberal/progressive activists?

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
I'm finding something possibly interesting. Lerner wasn't signing approval letters. Only these 'demand' letters. Was she trying to keep too many eyes off what was happening to protect the crime?  Here is an example of an approval letter from the same time.


Online DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45,962
  • Gender: Male
  • "...and the winning number is...not yours!
Just because her 'signature' is on the letters....doesn't mean she physically signed the document.

They put her name on the letters in order to further intimidate the recipients.
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald

Oceander

  • Guest
Further from the article:

Quote
Here’s what the IG report cited as questions that crossed the line:





Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Oceander

  • Guest