The Briefing Room

Exclusive Content => Member Journals => The Last Wire => Topic started by: Luis Gonzalez on February 12, 2015, 10:54:58 PM

Title: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: Luis Gonzalez on February 12, 2015, 10:54:58 PM
Title: Re: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: Lando Lincoln on February 12, 2015, 11:34:56 PM
Incredible. Thanks for such a stunning post.
Title: Re: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: Scottftlc on February 13, 2015, 02:27:30 AM
Maybe it's just me but neither of those pictures bears any resemblance to other pics I've seen of her in her early days with Bill.
Title: Re: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: Oceander on February 15, 2015, 04:43:21 PM
Of a piece with Jane Fonda.
Title: Re: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: mystery-ak on February 15, 2015, 04:55:59 PM
Neither one of those is Hillary

(http://cdn.inquisitr.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Hillary-Clinton-Birthday-1969.jpg)

(http://cache.boston.com/bonzai-fba/Third_Party_Photo/2007/03/04/1173002616_4309.jpg)

(http://main-designyoutrust.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Hillary-Clinton-1969-8.jpg)
Title: Re: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: musiclady on February 15, 2015, 04:59:35 PM
Maybe it's just me but neither of those pictures bears any resemblance to other pics I've seen of her in her early days with Bill.

It's not Hillary.

She was far uglier than that woman.
Title: Re: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: olde north church on February 16, 2015, 08:52:06 AM
Nada (little Spanish lingo there).
Title: Re: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: Meshuge Mikey on October 27, 2015, 11:15:17 PM
a perhaps slightly less obscure photo of hillary n ole billy


Yes that Is Panther Whizz in the goblet near hillary's hands



(http://i.imgur.com/NNaMeQU.jpg)
Title: Re: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: Meshuge Mikey on October 27, 2015, 11:22:41 PM

(https://i.imgur.com/aKbp7Zg.png)




I have serious dubts as to the identty of this woman


I dare say it LOOKS nothing at all hillary clinton. Ths shape of the head is entirely wrong and the nose is far longer than hillarys


the second photo also not hillary


(https://i.imgur.com/2z4VMgH.png)
Title: Re: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: June Truth on October 15, 2016, 07:37:19 PM
 The woman in the first picture is not Hillary Clinton. Her name is Celia Sanchez Manduley. Every Cuban or anyone who has studied Cuban history knows that. The woman in the second picture is not Hillary either...  :nono:  888high58888
Title: Re: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: Sighlass on January 22, 2017, 07:35:24 PM
The woman in the first picture is not Hillary Clinton. Her name is Celia Sanchez Manduley.

Sure seems like you are correct. @June Truth and welcome to TBR. Glad to have ya.

(http://i67.tinypic.com/oshbuc.jpg)
Title: Re: Two Legendary Pictures
Post by: LateForLunch on August 24, 2017, 04:43:58 PM
Hill-O-Lies' bona fides as a Communist are abundantly validated by her own admission, in letters she wrote to her hero SAUL ALINSKY, for whom she wanted to work when she left college. Alinsky's stated goal (articulated in Rules for Radicals) was to overthrow the United States government BY ANY AND ALL MEANS NECESSARY - a goal which Hill-O-Lies shared.

Alinsky fully admitted that he saw nothing whatsoever morally wrong with violent revolution (as in the formation of the Soviet Union) except that like Trotskii, he believed that blunt force physical combat/slaughter would not be as EFFECTIVE as the more-subtle approach.

She stated that she chose not to go to work with Alinsky because she wanted to go into government service and feared that association with his organization would be a negative (a radical Marxist revolutionary socialist). In her letters to Alinsky she seemed bitterly disappointed and apologized profusely, swearing that she "shared all of the goals to which Marxist Revolution aspires" but that she had decided to approach revolution from a different direction.

Yep. She did that alright. Deceit, sedition, subversion, deception, sabotage. Those are more her style.