The Briefing Room

General Category => Editorial/Opinion/Blogs => Topic started by: rangerrebew on February 06, 2019, 03:48:04 pm

Title: What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
Post by: rangerrebew on February 06, 2019, 03:48:04 pm

What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
By The Real Side -
Feb 5, 2019



Outraged at “ripping children away from their mothers” But killing them is OK?

Sen. Ben Sasse and his Republican colleagues did not receive the unanimous consent they were looking for on legislation that would’ve outlawed infanticide.

Democratic Washington Sen. Patty Murray blocked the “Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act,” presented by Sasse, that would’ve given infants who survived abortions medical care and protections under the law.

“Frankly, this shouldn’t be hard,” he said.

https://therealside.com/2019/02/what-could-anyone-have-against-protecting-babies/
Title: Re: What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on February 07, 2019, 02:29:34 am
Even animals protect their young.

Those advocating infanticide are lower than that.
Title: Re: What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
Post by: Wingnut on February 07, 2019, 05:43:22 am
Quote from: IsailedawayfromFR on February 07, 2019, 02:29:34 am
Even animals protect their young.



Not really. They eat them.
Title: Re: What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
Post by: Frank Cannon on February 07, 2019, 05:50:43 am
What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?

They're too needy?
Title: Re: What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
Post by: RoosGirl on February 07, 2019, 05:55:03 am
Quote from: Amb. Frank Cannon on February 07, 2019, 05:50:43 am
What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?

They're too needy?

No doubt, like waking you up at 2am wanting to be fed or have a diaper change.  Jeez.  Course, some husbands do the same thing.
Title: Re: What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
Post by: Wingnut on February 07, 2019, 05:58:17 am
Quote from: RoosGirl on February 07, 2019, 05:55:03 am
No doubt, like waking you up at 2am wanting to be fed or have a diaper change.  Jeez.  Course, some husbands do the same thing.

What is needy about a little slap and tickle an a suck?
Title: Re: What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
Post by: RoosGirl on February 07, 2019, 06:05:39 am
Quote from: The Ghost on February 07, 2019, 05:58:17 am
What is needy about a little slap and tickle an a suck?

Nothing, it's the 2 am thing.
Title: Re: What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
Post by: Wingnut on February 07, 2019, 06:09:20 am
Quote from: RoosGirl on February 07, 2019, 06:05:39 am
Nothing, it's the 2 am thing.
Well that is just rude....unless you are nursing,
Title: Re: What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
Post by: Frank Cannon on February 07, 2019, 06:10:15 am
Quote from: RoosGirl on February 07, 2019, 05:55:03 am
No doubt, like waking you up at 2am wanting to be fed or have a diaper change.  Jeez.  Course, some husbands do the same thing.

I got a hired woman for that.
Title: Re: What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
Post by: IsailedawayfromFR on February 09, 2019, 02:03:11 pm
Quote from: The Ghost on February 07, 2019, 05:43:22 am
Not really. They eat them.
Then they would be extinct.

Think about what you say.  Makes it safer for you.
Title: Re: What could ANYONE have against protecting babies?
Post by: RoosGirl on February 09, 2019, 04:12:56 pm
Quote from: IsailedawayfromFR on February 09, 2019, 02:03:11 pm
Then they would be extinct.

Think about what you say.  Makes it safer for you.

Indeed.

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/03/140328-sloth-bear-zoo-infanticide-chimps-bonobos-animals/